Forced Induction Supercharger/Turbocharger

Boost VS. timing

Old Mar 7, 2005 | 02:58 PM
  #16  
rskrause's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 10,745
From: Buffalo, New York
Re: Boost VS. timing

Originally Posted by tubby
i run 29 deg. with 16# boost and small nitrous, but most people shudder when they here that. my motor has always liked it though and it was built to handle alot more than 16#.
I'm curious if you have dyno tests to back up that amount of advance as optimal. It would be more than I have seen.

Rich
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 05:55 PM
  #17  
Lisa33's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 505
From: Sweden
Re: Boost VS. timing

Wen we dynoed last spring (p1sc 11psi twin ic 383 ported stock heads cc305) we started at 11-11.5 A/F and 25-26 degrees timing (tabells)=510rwhp we started to adjust A/F to 12-12.5 dont remember how much gain but when we were finished it ended up at 28-30 degrees from 4-6000rpm= 570rwhp, we tried to add more timing widh negative respond.
Whats important to think of is that a dyno run takes less time than a run down the 1/4 so count whith a higher IAT down the way and pull 1 or 2 degrees extra for saftey...
dont have all the dyno sheats to prove every change, the dyno could only storage 4 runs at the time and we didnt save beatween the runs, just deleted the old ones when we got improvment .

Last edited by Lisa33; Mar 7, 2005 at 05:59 PM.
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 06:34 PM
  #18  
Schurters LT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,942
From: kitchener/Ontario
Re: Boost VS. timing

If you have lower CR (my will be 8:4.1) will this let me add 1-2* more if i was @9:1cr....

would someone post there timing curve (wot tables)
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 07:12 PM
  #19  
Schurters LT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,942
From: kitchener/Ontario
Re: Boost VS. timing

When doing timing tables do you lock in the hole table at 24* in the 95-100kpa.

With the stock timing tables at what rpm do you start add in the timing....
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 07:21 PM
  #20  
SMOKNZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,178
From: Cleveland, WI
Re: Boost VS. timing

What I have seen with timing tables is the lowest value of the table occures at the RPM of peak torque, as the cylinder pressures will be highest at that point. Usually the timing will decrease as you approach peak torque, and increase a little there-after.
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 09:20 AM
  #21  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 659
From: Chicago, IL
Re: Boost VS. timing

Sure with less compression you might be running a good amount of timing depending on boost and fuel.

Personally, I would never run the AF leaner than 12:1 in a FI car, so I consider Lisa's 12.5 to be on the edge of safe with that timing, assuming pump gas.

What is stock LT1 timing at WOT?
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 09:49 AM
  #22  
tubby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 385
From: columbia, sc
Re: Boost VS. timing

rich,
in response to the dyno info. i did indeed dyno it many times and settled on 29. it would make more power @ 30-31 but not enough to justify the risks. i often wondered if it was a timing problem but a verified it many times against a timing light. i plan to pull the motor shortly and will post if i find anything wierd. comp. ratio is just under 8:1 also
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 10:24 AM
  #23  
biggtime's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 93
From: SE PA
Re: Boost VS. timing

Originally Posted by tubby
rich,
in response to the dyno info. i did indeed dyno it many times and settled on 29. it would make more power @ 30-31 but not enough to justify the risks. i often wondered if it was a timing problem but a verified it many times against a timing light. i plan to pull the motor shortly and will post if i find anything wierd. comp. ratio is just under 8:1 also
Did you ever check to ensure your timing marks are in fact true TDC?

I also never run leaner than 12:1
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 10:27 AM
  #24  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 659
From: Chicago, IL
Re: Boost VS. timing

Slightly off from the topic, but when I had a 11.5:1 ARE 422 setup I tried four different timing amounts one day on the dyno. Keeping in mind that stock is like 26, we tried 25, 27, 30, and 32. Made most power around 28-29 but the gain from 25 degrees to 30 degrees was like 4rwhp.
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 10:47 AM
  #25  
TravisA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 613
From: Raceland,KY
Re: Boost VS. timing

Originally Posted by Schurters LT1
When doing timing tables do you lock in the hole table at 24* in the 95-100kpa.
I was wondering that myself?
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 01:55 PM
  #26  
tubby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 385
From: columbia, sc
Re: Boost VS. timing

i checked true TDC several times. i was seeing large jumps in hp (20+) until i got to around 28 then very little from there. pretty sure we backed off at 31 maybe 32
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 02:43 PM
  #27  
Jeff 96 SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 310
From: frederick MD.
Re: Boost VS. timing

I'm running 31 degrees in my SS and 34 in My TA and I have several dyno pulls to back up these numbers all of my tunes are on Race gas! All boosted cars are different in the amount of timing they like. My SS makes the most power with 32 degrees and and around 11.2AFR not sure why it likes it so rich but it does. My TA likes 34 and I set it at around 11.8 AFR it makes more power the leaner I take it but I'm scared

Jeff
96 SS BLOWN
96 TA 396 D1
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 03:08 PM
  #28  
Lisa33's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 505
From: Sweden
Re: Boost VS. timing

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Sure with less compression you might be running a good amount of timing depending on boost and fuel.
Personally, I would never run the AF leaner than 12:1 in a FI car, so I consider Lisa's 12.5 to be on the edge of safe with that timing, assuming pump gas.
Oure 98oct (RON) is a little higher than youre 93 it also has a 5% etahnol in it from the pump.
The A/F were between 12.15 to 12.4 on the dyno if i remember correct, and than i added +/- .1 for diffrent wether conditions.
Only used that tune on the strip, for ordinary driving -2degrees+and not so much WOT driving
Comp were 9.0
But yes i agree it was a little aggresiv tune, dont think im gonna aim for the last HP on the new setup.
Ake
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 04:19 PM
  #29  
Schurters LT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,942
From: kitchener/Ontario
Re: Boost VS. timing

anyone care to post the timing tables(wot)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
1
May 25, 2016 08:10 PM
RUENUF
South Atlantic
4
Mar 13, 2016 03:39 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 29, 2015 07:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 11, 2015 06:10 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17 AM.