Shorties vs stock manifolds?
Shorties vs stock manifolds?
I am looking into getting shorties for my z, I did some research and I know everyone is gonna tell me to get long tube headers. The thing is from what I read the long tube headers are pain to install, more expensive, issue with ground clearance and I will have to get another y-pipe to make it work. For those reasons I am looking into shorties.
So, what gains can I see from going from manifolds to shorties, or should I just get LTH or nothing?
So, what gains can I see from going from manifolds to shorties, or should I just get LTH or nothing?
With cold air, mail order tune, short tube SLP headers and Borla cat back I was even with a stock 6 speed LS1.
I went to the drag strip with my Short tube SLP's and cc305 cam and ran 106mph in the winter. I later added Jet hot long tubes. This was the only mod. And ran 108mph on a summer day.
The SLP's are the only ones emission legal and have the largest primaries. They area also stainless steel.
If you have only bolt ons on the car I think mac would be a good less expensive choice but the best shorties will probably be the SLP and ASM
hope this post makes sense because I'm drunk right now
I went to the drag strip with my Short tube SLP's and cc305 cam and ran 106mph in the winter. I later added Jet hot long tubes. This was the only mod. And ran 108mph on a summer day.
The SLP's are the only ones emission legal and have the largest primaries. They area also stainless steel.
If you have only bolt ons on the car I think mac would be a good less expensive choice but the best shorties will probably be the SLP and ASM
hope this post makes sense because I'm drunk right now
Gains with shorty headers...around 5-15 HP. I noticed a little bit better performance since I've got shorty headers on my car, but if I could magically pass smog in California with long tube headers I'd have a set on my car before the end of the year! If running long tube headers is a option you can pass you smog test with, get long tubes! There worth the extra effort, and money even if your looking at kooks and ARH. The older style SLP long tube headers (for the LS1)are probably what you heard about with having ground clearance issues. Otherwise if you still feel that shorty header are your best option then get them.
Last edited by bluz28; Dec 26, 2009 at 01:35 PM.
my Jet hot long tubes are the lowest part of the car. The Long tube flange that connects to the y-pipe is the lowest part on the car. My car isn't lowered but does have RS ground effects. I sometimes hit that flange when going over high speed bumps with a 2nd person in the car.
But the extra power is well worth the trade off.
But the extra power is well worth the trade off.
BTW, emission is not an issue. I live in Canada and we don't test that here, so far sure there was talk about few years ago but still nothing.
I am looking into getting shorties for my z, I did some research and I know everyone is gonna tell me to get long tube headers. The thing is from what I read the long tube headers are pain to install, more expensive, issue with ground clearance and I will have to get another y-pipe to make it work. For those reasons I am looking into shorties.
So, what gains can I see from going from manifolds to shorties, or should I just get LTH or nothing?
So, what gains can I see from going from manifolds to shorties, or should I just get LTH or nothing?
BTW, you got one fast a** car dude.
AS&M makes excellent mid-length headers for the LT1. I've seen them make more HP than the Hooker long tubes, in a dyno comparison on an LT1 making about 800HP. Test was run at 5,000rpm and above, since that's where the engine operated all the way down the track. When the owner eventually decided to switch headers, I picked the (modified to eliminate the Y-pipe) AS&M's up for $175. Still using them at the 800HP level.
AS&M makes excellent mid-length headers for the LT1. I've seen them make more HP than the Hooker long tubes, in a dyno comparison on an LT1 making about 800HP. Test was run at 5,000rpm and above, since that's where the engine operated all the way down the track. When the owner eventually decided to switch headers, I picked the (modified to eliminate the Y-pipe) AS&M's up for $175. Still using them at the 800HP level.
Not to hijack the thread, but is there a power range or some other way to decide when it's not worth it to use shortys? I'm rebuilding with Elliot's LE2 package, 1.6 ProMags, 224/230 cam, and a .3 overbore. I was going to use BBK shortys, but will these be a restriction at that point? My only goal is 400-450 NA, don't ever want NOS or SC/TC.
Re: Shorties vs stock manifolds?
If you don't have emissions testing to deal with (like me) I went with Kooks (coated) long tubes 3" Y pipe and I have great ground clearance on my stock height car. You'll get the most power/torque if you can go to the long tubes.


