Exhaust System From headers to exhaust tips

3" Hooker -> 3.5" Mufflex

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2008, 03:17 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
James Montigny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,444
3" Hooker -> 3.5" Mufflex (Spintech)

I love the sound of my current setup, but I picked up a 3.5"" mufflex at a good price last night.
I don't know if it's worth putting on my car or not.

Originally Posted by OldSchoolSS
A 3” Single system is good for a 370hp engine with zero loss…
A 3.5” Single system is good for a 503hp engine with zero loss…
So will upgrading from a 3" Hooker to a 3.5" Mufflex/Spintech help me at all?

Forged H/C 355, should make about 400-410rwhp @ 6300rpm N/A through a very loose 4000 stall. (2.65 STR)
(replaces my current 350, uses the same cam and heads but with more compression)
Already has LTs and the ORY could be modified to accept a 3.5" catback.
Complete mods list -> http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2297151

The higher redline of the new motor has me thinking that I may need the extra flow.

Thoughts?

Last edited by James Montigny; 03-19-2008 at 07:22 AM.
James Montigny is offline  
Old 03-18-2008, 03:25 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
dangalla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: lakeville, pa
Posts: 2,093
hmmm. now you got me thinking,

subscribe so see where this goes
dangalla is offline  
Old 03-18-2008, 08:27 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
blownbird01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: altoona,pa
Posts: 284
I have the system. It sounds pretty awesome. I had mac mid length headers and borla exhaust before and ran an 11.49@ 121. I installed long tubes and mufflex and ran a 11.2@ 124.
blownbird01 is offline  
Old 03-18-2008, 11:16 PM
  #4  
Administrator
 
Injuneer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Posts: 70,666
Which Mufflex 3.5".... the one with the single outlet Flowmaster or the one with the dual outlet SpinTech? They sound radically different, but appear to have similar performance capacity.

The numbers posted in the quote appear to have been derived simply by comparing the "square" of the system diameters. I saw a 4" Mufflex handle 1,125HP on a blown 383. When they pulled the Mufflex off to save weight (50#) there was no change in HP through Borla XR-1's bolted to the collectors.
Injuneer is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 07:21 AM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
James Montigny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,444
Originally Posted by Injuneer
Which Mufflex 3.5".... the one with the single outlet Flowmaster or the one with the dual outlet SpinTech? They sound radically different, but appear to have similar performance capacity.
Spintech.
James Montigny is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 06:59 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
blownbird01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: altoona,pa
Posts: 284
Which sounds better? 4" flowmaster single out or the dual out spintech?
blownbird01 is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 07:03 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
dangalla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: lakeville, pa
Posts: 2,093
Originally Posted by Injuneer
The numbers posted in the quote appear to have been derived simply by comparing the "square" of the system diameters. I saw a 4" Mufflex handle 1,125HP on a blown 383. When they pulled the Mufflex off to save weight (50#) there was no change in HP through Borla XR-1's bolted to the collectors.
so what do you think, am i losing alot with a single 3 inch magnaflow making ~400 rwhp
dangalla is offline  
Old 03-19-2008, 07:09 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
James Montigny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,444
I think I'm just going to sell it then.
I like the way mine sounds, I don't want to change it.
James Montigny is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 10:26 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
mzgp5x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 1,174
I did the 3 1/2" mufflex cat_back with a spintech single pipe exit on the left side. The Spintech muffler was restriction to flow in my application (Camaro 97ss 383 - D1). I modified the Mufflex single pipe system with a qtp electric cut. That solved the problem. My application was FI, so, the mufflex "chambered" design in not a good option. Chev HiPo had a good article on exhaust systems. and, that sent me on a mission to improve. I ended up with a 3 1/2" perforated pipe dynomax glass fill straight thru 6" round muffler. Don't know how the Spintech would be on a NA application. Hope this helps. B.
mzgp5x is offline  
Old 03-25-2008, 11:24 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Me>you's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: archbald, PA
Posts: 174
The Aerochamber muffler is great to about 375hp before it becomes a restriction, and 3" piping is adequate to support about that power level for a single setup...Honestly, you're in the category where it won't make a noticeable difference...The Honker sounds great, so just keep it...If you want all out performance for strip use, get yourself a cutout...
Me>you is offline  
Old 03-27-2008, 08:00 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
6speedZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 567
My set up is Flow Tech LT's, ORY, and the 3.5in Mufflex/Flowmaster single out. I think it sounds great, def. noticed an increase in power over the dual-dual I had on the car before. Plus I get mistaken for a V6 "SS clone" all the time when the car is off at a show. Start it up and people are pretty suprised.
6speedZ28 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
G-BODYT56
Parts For Sale
6
01-14-2022 11:14 PM
RUENUF
Cars For Sale
6
03-13-2016 03:37 PM
CARiD
Exhaust System
0
08-03-2015 05:10 AM
Devinfoote87
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
2
07-30-2015 09:54 AM
96 TA
Drag Racing Technique
0
09-01-2002 02:48 PM



Quick Reply: 3" Hooker -> 3.5" Mufflex



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 AM.