Drivetrain Clutch, Torque Converter, Transmission, Driveline, Axles, Rear Ends

Manually Shifting an auto?

Old May 8, 2004 | 06:26 PM
  #1  
99BlackTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 905
From: Memphis, TN
Manually Shifting an auto?

Is it bad for our automatic trannies to manually shift them? I haven't tried it yet but I used to do it on all my other cars and it didn't seem to hurt anything.
Old May 8, 2004 | 06:41 PM
  #2  
1984camaroz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,958
From: Middeltown NY
mine shifted fine when i got my car the a manulay ahifted it.... lasted 6 months
Old May 8, 2004 | 06:55 PM
  #3  
OldSchoolSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 405
From: Wisconsin
From what i read don't manually shift it unless the transmission is specifically built for it.
Old May 8, 2004 | 07:26 PM
  #4  
Eff's Avatar
Eff
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 643
From: St. Charles, IL
Re: Manually Shifting an auto?

Originally posted by ElectronBlueC3
Is it bad for our automatic trannies to manually shift them? I haven't tried it yet but I used to do it on all my other cars and it didn't seem to hurt anything.

Well, not really, as long as your not down shifting. but it's kinda pointless. you're track times will be worse. Even if you did it perfect. it wouldn't really be much different from sticking it in drive and going WOT. that is unless you raised the rev limiter.
Old May 8, 2004 | 07:32 PM
  #5  
BlakeW5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 478
From: Hodgenville, Kentucky
Like said, as long as you're upshifting only you should be fine. However, I recently heard that you shouldn't even do that. Apparantly, when you manually shift the car, the transmission doesn't have time to build up line pressure and can damage things (think I read it in an article in GMHTP).
Old May 8, 2004 | 08:26 PM
  #6  
med_reject's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 627
From: Edmonton, AB, Canada
i used to upshift, never downshift. Then one day, the car acted as if it was only in neutral. I was 16 so and i didnt know anything about transmissions, i have no idea what happened to it except that it had to be replaced. this happened while i was driving, so i had to push it into a parking lot (i was stuck at an intersection, people were watching, horning, a couple of buddies saw me and helped, it totally sucked.

Getting the tranny repalced cost $2g. My dad paid for it, and he was unhappy.
Old May 8, 2004 | 11:01 PM
  #7  
12SCNDZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,634
From: Newark, Delaware
Ok...There's a thread about this question about once a month. The fact is, someone is spreading false information. It will NOT hurt a 700/4L60E to upshift it manually!
This "theory" is based on 14 years of building (and racing) automatic transmissions. There was some "theory" about a 4L60E dropping pressure when shifted manually. I've never seen a 700/4L60E have any problems from shifting manually, so I investigated this "theory" to much extent. I've put pressure guages on several 4L60E's since this "theory" first came out. There isn't ever a pressure loss on ANY shift! Maybe the person/persons who came up with this "theory" is doing something wrong on their rebuilds??? MOST transmission have higher line pressure in manual ranges.

As for the "theory" brought forth earlier in this thread. Anybody that doesn't believe a car will run quicker when manually shifting can come to the track with me and we'll make a bet on it.

BTW, my personal 700 has been in the 12's for the past 3 years, and it gets manually upshifted and downshifted around 75% of the time.....

Frank
Old May 8, 2004 | 11:51 PM
  #8  
ishz28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 547
From: Bradenton, FL
It's late, I'm bored at work and I have no useful information for this thread other than. It's not a theory, it's an hypothesis. A theory, was once a hypothesis, studied many different ways over a course of years and then is accepted by the majority of the scientific community. Then it becomes a proven, accepted theory. Sorry, just had to be a smart ***.

Last edited by ishz28; May 8, 2004 at 11:58 PM.
Old May 8, 2004 | 11:57 PM
  #9  
med_reject's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 627
From: Edmonton, AB, Canada
this hypothesis needs to be tested with a randomized, multicentre, double blind placebo controlled trial. A placebo transmission would be one that allows the driver to shift manually, but is actually shifting automatically and ignoring his shifts.
Old May 8, 2004 | 11:57 PM
  #10  
GreenDemon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,770
From: Mishawaka, IN
Originally posted by BlakeW5
Like said, as long as you're upshifting only you should be fine. However, I recently heard that you shouldn't even do that. Apparantly, when you manually shift the car, the transmission doesn't have time to build up line pressure and can damage things (think I read it in an article in GMHTP).
I think I read that article, too. Or one similar to it. It was from one of the top transmission builders in the country, so I'll take their word for it. There's not really much point in manually shifting anyway, unless something's not working right.
Old May 9, 2004 | 12:21 AM
  #11  
mebanditws6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 622
From: Nashville, TN
Manually shifting 1-2 will do nothing but hit the rev limiter. 200 rpms between the shiftpoints and rev limiter is hard to anticitpate in 1st gear with the stock tachs. 2-3 manually does help a little though, especially in a 2.73 car where the bottom of 3rd will kill you in a close race unless you string out 2nd. I pulled on a 5spd Neon with exhaust by running 3rd gear out till close to the rev limiter in my Jeep.

Jason
Old May 9, 2004 | 02:17 AM
  #12  
TobyZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,325
From: BC
I downshift sometimes when im going fairly slow in the city to slow down before a light... never had any problems with doing it. I could understand if you downshift at hwy speeds though, probably a baaad idea.

With 3.23 gears I dont really see any reason for shifting up manually.... it chirps 1-2 and sometimes 2-3. But then again i've never really driving in a Z with 2.73 gears... so maybe it helps there
Old May 9, 2004 | 04:16 AM
  #13  
Ryan's LT1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 561
From: Ventura County, CA
I usually leave mine in OD (hope that isn't bad) when i'm cruisin around, but when i need to get on it i usually just floor it and shifts for me.. unless im light-racing, then down into 1 it goes, and i do the rest.

Never had any problems so far.
Old May 9, 2004 | 06:18 PM
  #14  
Eff's Avatar
Eff
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 643
From: St. Charles, IL
Originally posted by 12SCNDZ

As for the "theory" brought forth earlier in this thread. Anybody that doesn't believe a car will run quicker when manually shifting can come to the track with me and we'll make a bet on it.

Even on a stock car? I can't remember what the rev limiter onon a camaro is but it can't be too much above 5845. Not to mention thats when the power band begins to drop anyway. On a modified car with a shifted power band. that may be correct,

Last edited by Eff; May 9, 2004 at 06:26 PM.
Old May 9, 2004 | 06:44 PM
  #15  
12SCNDZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,634
From: Newark, Delaware
My rev limiter is set at 6600 RPM's, through my 7AL-2 box. Before I put the 7A in it, I had NO rev limiter because my Hypertech chip did away with it...As does my current PCMFORLESS chip.

Frank

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 PM.