Drivetrain Clutch, Torque Converter, Transmission, Driveline, Axles, Rear Ends

LT1 T-56 vs. LS1 T-56

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 4, 2003 | 01:19 PM
  #1  
scorp508's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5
From: Raynham, MA
LT1 T-56 vs. LS1 T-56

Hi everyone. I'm sorry for bringing up what is probably a beaten to death horse.

I'm looking at the possibility of swapping a T-56 in for my current 4+3 tranny in my '87 vette with modified L98 over the winter. I'm told that the input shaft on the LS1 T-56 is longer and therefore unusable for my application.

Is this the case and if so is it relatively easy to swap out the input shafts during a rebuild on the unit?

What other differences are there to be aware of? Bellhousing? Clutch setup? Rated torque values?

Thank you for your help!
Old Nov 4, 2003 | 02:56 PM
  #2  
G-BODYT56's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 123
From: Panama City, Florida, USA
Cool

Hey Brian, the 98-UP LS-1 does indeed have a longer input shaft than the 1993-97 LT-1 T-56. You can replace the input shaft on the LS-1 version for the shorter LT-1 version , along with the front cover to use the external SLAVE CYLINDER, but you just might want to retain that LS-1 inputshaft and integral H.T.O.B , and then get that MCLEOD T-56 universal bellhousing, since it is designed for the LS-1 T-56 version, plus the AFTER-MARKET T-56. I know it is expensive, but you will then have a DRAG RACING safe bellhousing, for that SUPER-RAMMED L-98, and when/if you ever up the cubes, you will be able to get a clutch that will handle the power. This is the method I would take Brian, trust me, I have the 1993-97 T-56 and I am sick of these CORNY clutch setups, I tried most of them, ( LT-4 PP with CLUTCH-NET disc--JUNK!!!) (SPEC STAGE III-- ABSOLUTE JUNK!!!, this one destroyed my spare FLYWHEEL (LT-4 PP with SLP disc-- JUNK!!!) and (LT-4 PP with RAM disc, was OK, but it slips after awhile also. The absolute BEST 1993-97 T-56 CLUTCH is the MCLEOD STREET-TWIN. If you are going to insist on the SWAPPING of the inputshaft for the LT-1 T-56, this is the only way.....PERIOD, I'm saving for one myself. Good luck Brian, and see you on Corvette Forum.
Old Nov 4, 2003 | 04:07 PM
  #3  
scorp508's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5
From: Raynham, MA
Wow thanks for all that. You may or may not of seen I also destroyed my centerforce D/F clutch so I'm already planning on putting a Mcleod Street Twin back in there. Is it even available for the LS1 style tranny? I didn't look to see yet as I was only looking at the T-10 versions right now.

I don't mind going with that Mcleod bellhousing you mentioned. Is it SFI approved?

My 2 big decisions right now are.....

1. Do I want to put a street twin clutch into my car now and just go with that until things explode again.

2. Do I want to park the car for winter and pick up a 6-speed, have it rebuilt, cryo'd, and put that and a clutch in either over winter or early spring.
Old Nov 4, 2003 | 04:13 PM
  #4  
G-BODYT56's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 123
From: Panama City, Florida, USA
Talking

I think that Mcleod makes the ST for the LS-1 as well, and I would just wait, and do what you plan on doing over the winter, plus use the 6-Speed . That 4+3 is marginal, and the kind of grip you will achieve from the ST, that 4+3 will just give up the GHOST quicker. HTH's Brian.
Old Nov 4, 2003 | 04:23 PM
  #5  
scorp508's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5
From: Raynham, MA
I like to break things. I've got a spare 4+3 I am going to allow my brother to rebuild in his tranny class at tech college down in RI. I was going to also have it cryo treated and see if it would hold up. The 6-speed idea is looking more and more tempting though.....
Old Nov 13, 2003 | 01:41 PM
  #6  
unTAmedLS1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 713
From: Glenview,Illinois,USA
Which stage 3 did u have the old version(4 puck) or new 6 puck cuz I have the 6 puck carbon and have had no probs whatsoever
Old Nov 13, 2003 | 01:49 PM
  #7  
G-BODYT56's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 123
From: Panama City, Florida, USA
Angry

The old 4-PUC style
Old Nov 13, 2003 | 08:00 PM
  #8  
unTAmedLS1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 713
From: Glenview,Illinois,USA
oh thats why...Lots of people had probs with those I have heard pretty much nothing about the six pucks having probs though thats why I went with it
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rideordie
LS1 Based Engine Tech
9
Nov 5, 2019 04:52 PM
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 29, 2015 07:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 11, 2015 06:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 28, 2014 06:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 PM.