broke 12's tonight at HRP!
12-25-2003, 01:28 PM
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 958
Go
i guess i do have a couple more questions.....how do you like your Strange gears? Would you say those are the ones I should go with on my car? And on your programming did you get the shift points changed?, and how happy are you with the pcm4less tune? Theres just so many decisions i need to make for the upcoming year, so any help or suggestions are appreciated.
________
MARIJUANA SEED
________
MARIJUANA SEED
Last edited by MarkyMark; 09-14-2011 at 01:06 PM.
12-25-2003, 02:03 PM
#17
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 1,001
Well this is my first gear install and I cant speak from experience from other gears. But I do indeed like the Strange gears. Supposed to be one of the strongest plus it has little whine. Overall im satisified with them.
I think everyone should have 3.73s
I noticed 2-3mpg loss but hell, if wanted good gas milage i should have bought a civic right? The gears are so much fun and really woke the car up.
About the programming. One thing I noticed when i had my 3.73s put in on my stock 2.73 tune. I could go WOT and the car would shift perfect and wouldnt hit the rev limiter. Dunno why, but it worked out like that. Another thing I noticed is the car shifts extremely hard after the gear install... im guessing thats normal...
Im glad I went with PCM4Less, Bryan is a really nice guy and has helped me out ALOT. When I first got my tune (back when I had 2.73s) I actually felt the difference with this performace tuning. Again, im VERY satisified with Bryan and PCM4Less.
I think I got most of your questions answered
-Robert
I think everyone should have 3.73s
I noticed 2-3mpg loss but hell, if wanted good gas milage i should have bought a civic right? The gears are so much fun and really woke the car up.About the programming. One thing I noticed when i had my 3.73s put in on my stock 2.73 tune. I could go WOT and the car would shift perfect and wouldnt hit the rev limiter. Dunno why, but it worked out like that. Another thing I noticed is the car shifts extremely hard after the gear install... im guessing thats normal...
Im glad I went with PCM4Less, Bryan is a really nice guy and has helped me out ALOT. When I first got my tune (back when I had 2.73s) I actually felt the difference with this performace tuning. Again, im VERY satisified with Bryan and PCM4Less.
I think I got most of your questions answered
-Robert
12-29-2003, 08:43 AM
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 133
awesome numbers bro, I went to the track yesterday night and with the items in my sig MINUS the headers, pretty much just CAI, Pulley, and Cut out and clutch i managed to hit a best of 13.49
RT .452
60ft 2.148
1/8 8.701
1/4 13.49
mph 106.19
I think i have a really strong running LT1, what do you guys think my times should be with a better RT and 60 FT considering what i trapped, Thanks!
RT .452
60ft 2.148
1/8 8.701
1/4 13.49
mph 106.19
I think i have a really strong running LT1, what do you guys think my times should be with a better RT and 60 FT considering what i trapped, Thanks!
12-29-2003, 09:37 AM
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Curacao (Caribbean Island)
Posts: 308
Originally posted by NYCz28
........I think i have a really strong running LT1, what do you guys think my times should be with a better RT and 60 FT considering what i trapped, Thanks!
........I think i have a really strong running LT1, what do you guys think my times should be with a better RT and 60 FT considering what i trapped, Thanks!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post