Computer Diagnostics and Tuning Technical discussion on diagnostics and programming of the F-body computers

Tuner Cat: Idle % Fuel/Air Table Question

Old Sep 8, 2003 | 01:27 PM
  #1  
ZPaul2Fresh8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,106
From: Toledo, Ohio USA
Tuner Cat: Idle % Fuel/Air Table Question

I was wondering why this table has different numbers for air/ fuel for each cylinders that are the exact same size on a stock .bin???

Example: (Stock)

Cyl 1: 1.03
Cyl 2: 1.00
Cyl 3: 0.97
Cyl 4: 1.00
Cyl 5: 1.00
Cyl 6: 0.97
Cyl 7: 0.93
Cyl 8: 1.00

Now I understand 1.00 = 100%, but that table title says "% air/fuel" so which one does the % number represent, air or fuel?

Anyone who can clear this confusion up would be greatly appreciated. I mean in my mind I would think 1.00 would be best for all cylinders for idle... but why aren't they???? THX.
Old Sep 8, 2003 | 03:21 PM
  #2  
TriPinTaZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 752
if you notice the cylinders closest to the throttle body are the ones that get more air/fuel
Old Sep 8, 2003 | 09:37 PM
  #3  
95Blackhawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,277
From: Phoenix, AZ
those no's represent fuel because that is the only thing that the car can modify. It cannot modify what each cylinder will get for air. I personally have a certain philosophy on this subject and it comes down to the fact that we cannot determine correct fueling mods without knowing what the AFR is coming out of each clylinder. Now think how practical that is.


Ben
Old Sep 8, 2003 | 11:55 PM
  #4  
TriPinTaZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 752
Originally posted by 95Blackhawk
those no's represent fuel because that is the only thing that the car can modify. It cannot modify what each cylinder will get for air. I personally have a certain philosophy on this subject and it comes down to the fact that we cannot determine correct fueling mods without knowing what the AFR is coming out of each clylinder. Now think how practical that is.


Ben

Its called exhaust Gas Temperatures. Its used on almost all bench dynometers to get individual readings for each cylinder. You can set up the same system on a street car like the race cars do. Altho it does not measure A/F ratios its very accurate. example 1450 degrees F is too lean, 1300 F is too rich........Therefore you now have individual cylinder tuning
Old Sep 9, 2003 | 07:30 AM
  #5  
95Blackhawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,277
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally posted by TriPinTaZ
Its called exhaust Gas Temperatures. Its used on almost all bench dynometers to get individual readings for each cylinder. You can set up the same system on a street car like the race cars do. Altho it does not measure A/F ratios its very accurate. example 1450 degrees F is too lean, 1300 F is too rich........Therefore you now have individual cylinder tuning
Confirm what I have read: at stoich. AFR, you will have the highest EGT's. If you go rich, they will drop and if they go lean, they will drop.

But again, I will ask, how practical is your suggestion. Is there a way easier than pulling the engine?
Old Sep 9, 2003 | 04:09 PM
  #6  
TriPinTaZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 752
Ok here it goes.....

A leaner AF mixture will burn hotter than a Richer AFR. Therefor the following example applies

RICH AFR = ~1200F
Stoich AFR= ~1300 F
LEAn AFR= ~ 1400 F

This way you can individually tune each cylinder. And yes there is a better way than yanking the engine but it requires applying an EGT setup to your car. You will ahve to drill holes in your HEaders and to install them. They make these setups for race cars and Im sure you can get one on your car if you want to pay the $$$ for it.

One of our guys on WS6ZXR.com (trans-am forum) is using them on his car. It can be done
Old Sep 10, 2003 | 08:54 PM
  #7  
arnie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,462
From: smog zone adjacent to a great lake
I agree with Blackhawk. AFAIC, using exhaust temps by themselves, is a crap shoot. They need to be re-enforced with A/F (accurate) ratio readings. Used alone, it is sorta like using oem O2 sensors as gospel. They could be accurate, but certainly do not have to be.

ref: http://www.sdsefi.com/techegt.htm

Last edited by arnie; Sep 10, 2003 at 08:57 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DirtyDaveW
Forced Induction
13
Dec 1, 2016 05:37 PM
383TransAm
Parts Wanted
1
Feb 15, 2015 05:05 PM
pete53
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
Dec 9, 2014 07:31 AM
tubby
Forced Induction
7
Oct 13, 2003 09:16 AM
jrp4uc
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
1
Jun 19, 2002 06:20 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 PM.