Computer Diagnostics and Tuning Technical discussion on diagnostics and programming of the F-body computers

Quick SBLM variation at WOT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 28, 2004 | 08:17 PM
  #1  
JSK333's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,009
From: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Quick SBLM variation at WOT

Due to the nice weather today, I was tuning my car again.

While working on getting the high RPM/WOT MAF sensor values tweaked (by disabling PE mode), I noticed something kind of odd.

At WOT the short term BLMs would fluctuate between about 123 and 132, with the O2s following.

Normally, with a single commanded AFR, you'd think they would stay around the same value, right?

Any ideas on why this would happen?
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 08:43 PM
  #2  
JSK333's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,009
From: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Anyone?
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 08:55 PM
  #3  
97Z-M6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,058
From: near waco tx.
i would like to know how you diabled PE mode.
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 09:28 PM
  #4  
bunker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,305
From: North Vancouver, BC
Disable PE mode? don't know why but its easy, go to your FUEL section in LT1 edit & for the WOT TPS values put down something over 100% say 110%, then you'll never hit PE mode.
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 09:32 PM
  #5  
JSK333's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,009
From: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Originally posted by 97Z-M6
i would like to know how you diabled PE mode.
Make the minimum MAP value for WOT over 100, like 125.

Bunker, any ideas on what I'm experiencing?
Old Mar 20, 2004 | 02:10 AM
  #6  
bunker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,305
From: North Vancouver, BC
Not really, my friend is acctually talking about it, his buddy is experiensing the same thing, upload me your tune & I'll take a look at it:

bunker@telus.net

I'll help you out.
Old Mar 20, 2004 | 07:48 AM
  #7  
97Z-M6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,058
From: near waco tx.
thank you
Old Mar 20, 2004 | 12:49 PM
  #8  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
Just guessing, but if you are prohibiting it from entering PE mode, is it staying in closed loop, and still "learning"?
Old Mar 20, 2004 | 01:22 PM
  #9  
JSK333's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,009
From: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Originally posted by Injuneer
Just guessing, but if you are prohibiting it from entering PE mode, is it staying in closed loop, and still "learning"?
Yep, that's why I have it disabled. To get the MAF sensor as calibrated as possible in the WOT areas, so that when it's enabled, my commanded AFR for WOT will be accurate.

But, I am thinking that if I am at WOT, the engine is under load, and shooting for 14.7:1 AFR (PE disabled), that the engine should be producing a similar output... not going back and forth from rich to lean every other millisecond (123 then 134, etc.).

Does that better explain what I'm experiencing?
Old Mar 20, 2004 | 10:43 PM
  #10  
Injuneer's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 71,094
From: Hell was full so they sent me to NJ
If its still in closed loop at WOT, why wouldn't it continue to function exactly like it does at part throttle. That's what closed loop is all about... the PCM looks at the O2's and reacts by adding or pulling fuel with the short terms (INT's). It tends to overshoot - a little too rich, a little too lean... back and forth.... and I think that might actually be intentional, since it provides small pulses of oxygen/no oxygen through the cats to allow the "homogenous" combined reduction/oxidation catalysts to do their work. The fact that its "averaging" about 128 for the INT's would appear to confirm that.
Old Mar 20, 2004 | 10:45 PM
  #11  
JSK333's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,009
From: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Yeah, I see your point.

If I accelerate at a steady pace at part-throttle, the BLMs tend to stay about the same... so I thought it was odd how they vary at WOT.

Also, with PE enabled, generally the O2 sensor values stay pretty much the same while at WOT, so I guess I expected the BLMs to behave similarly when PE is disabled.

Oh well, thanks for the input. It's probably somewhat normal like you say.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PopoFormula
LT1 Based Engine Tech
5
Oct 12, 2015 04:19 PM
68camaroboltz
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
Oct 5, 2015 11:56 PM
95z_28_camaro_4_Ivan
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
13
Oct 3, 2015 07:27 PM
SEOJustin
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
5
Sep 24, 2015 04:39 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Sep 14, 2015 09:20 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 PM.