Computer Diagnostics and Tuning Technical discussion on diagnostics and programming of the F-body computers

False Rich Condition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 08:10 AM
  #16  
jchevy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,531
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted by bunker
I'm thinking more along the lines of a bad wideband, best way is try putting the wideband into another car or run the car in open loop and see what the wideband says at start up. If your wideband said 20:1 and the o2's said perfect 14.7, thats an equivalent of almost 4 points, your car wouldn't run at 10:1 on the street, it would fall flat on its face and hesitate like crazy durring cruise.
Even when my wideband is reading lean the o2s are still in the 900s. I tend to beleive the wideband, b/c when the o2s start pulling fuel the car runs like crap. When I have them disabled in open loop the car runs good.
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 10:09 AM
  #17  
bunker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,305
From: North Vancouver, BC
What do you mean by crap? Surging or bucking? a big cam always runs nice in open loop because it's rich, rich + overlap = builds cylinder pressure masking overlap.
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 10:36 AM
  #18  
jchevy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,531
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted by bunker
What do you mean by crap? Surging or bucking? a big cam always runs nice in open loop because it's rich, rich + overlap = builds cylinder pressure masking overlap.


It hesitates and misses badly.

When the wideband gets to around 16:1 I notice a loss in power. Arounded 16.5 to 17 I notice a little bit of a miss and hesitation. Much more than that and the car is hardly drivable. This is all low rpm and light throttle. I havent tried putting my foot into it with it so lean to see if it richens up.
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 11:10 AM
  #19  
VinceTrifecta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 477
From: Seattle area
If you disable closed loop, does what the wideband shows match the commanded open loop ratio?
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 04:04 PM
  #20  
jchevy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,531
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted by VinceTrifecta
If you disable closed loop, does what the wideband shows match the commanded open loop ratio?
I will have to look for sure, I know its not exact, but I think its pretty close. I beleive in the table my idle is around 13.8 and the wideband is between 14.5 and 15
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 04:20 PM
  #21  
VinceTrifecta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 477
From: Seattle area
This sounds like what I saw on my Impala SS. I tuned it to 14.2 in open loop which is pretty close to what the closed loop system aims for and it runs much better now in open loop.

Closed loop and big cams just don't work very well together. The cam timing causes excessive unburned fuel to get into the exhaust at low engine speeds which the computer tries to compensate for by leaning it out. Then it runs poorly.

It would be ideal if we had a way to specify that we only want open loop at low engine speeds, and let it go into closed loop at an RPM where closed loop will work properly. Some of the LS1 PCMs have custom OSes that allow this but not on the LT1. I tried using PE mode at low RPMs to fix this but the PCM appears to get confused.
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 04:28 PM
  #22  
jchevy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,531
From: Tucson, AZ
I know what you saying about the valve overlap and the 02s getting a false reading, but there is a lot of guys running LE1 cams that dont have this problem.

I used to run a closed loop tune when I first got the car running with the heads cam. Seemed to run ok, just fouled o2s after a couple thousand miles. Thats whey I ended up going with the closed loop tune. I didnt have the wideband then so I dont know where the a/f was at.

Just for fun Ill recalibrate the wideband and see if my readings change at all.
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 04:31 PM
  #23  
VinceTrifecta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 477
From: Seattle area
It could have something to do with the O2 sensor placement, too... Hard to say. Issues like this are tricky to track down.
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 08:16 PM
  #24  
sbs's Avatar
sbs
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,154
From: VA
Don't know the solution to the current problem, but going to an open loop tune on an LE1 or LT4hotcam is just an ugly hack.

Boatloads of people run those and similar cams in closed loop with no problems.
Old Mar 3, 2008 | 08:20 PM
  #25  
sbs's Avatar
sbs
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,154
From: VA
Originally Posted by jchevy
I tried a coupld GM ones I had around, and the others were aftermarket. Both read the same.
Since you have some spare O2s, hook up a couple spares and leave them dangling in the engine compartment. If they read rich then, you know you have a computer/sensor problem.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Henson071
Parts For Sale
2
Sep 18, 2015 04:01 PM
4586
LT1 Based Engine Tech
12
Aug 18, 2015 07:08 AM
Henson071
Parts For Sale
0
Aug 4, 2015 09:32 AM
realistyc
Cars For Sale
4
Jul 28, 2015 07:32 PM
Boss002
Autocross and Road Racing Technique
2
Jul 24, 2015 10:47 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 AM.