Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles
View Poll Results: If current M/C & Impala was on a RWD chassis, would your view of them change?
Wouldn't buy a RWD Monte Carlo or Impala regardless
2
5.71%
Wouldn't consider RWD M/C or Impala w/o a V8 option
5
14.29%
Would consider a RWD Monte Carlo
17
48.57%
Would consider a RWD Impala
11
31.43%
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll

Yep.....it's another poll (Impala & M/C related)

Old May 16, 2003 | 03:14 PM
  #1  
guionM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Yep.....it's another poll (Impala & M/C related)

Impala by almost every account is a great if ugly car. Monte Carlo, like the Impala is also a well made, high content, relatively cheap car. Both cars also are in the same market where they always have been.

Most of the complaints about the cars results from the flawed perception that the Impala name means performance (no doubt created from the '94-'97 SSs), and the fact that since there's no Camaro, everyone's focus is now on Monte Carlo (even though it was never a hot car... even the mid 80s version).

In the early 90s GM looked at making a version of the V-car here in the US which would have come out under the late 90s Buick & possibly the Impala & Monte Carlo as well.

With just this change, and no other, would your perception of Monte Carlo & Impala have changed, and would you have more likely bought one (even with the current engine lineup)?
Old May 16, 2003 | 03:28 PM
  #2  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
I voted Monte Carlo even though I would have voted Monte or Impala. Both are very well made very nice cars. I just wish they would change that dern dash in the Impies.
Old May 16, 2003 | 03:43 PM
  #3  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
I am torn. The MC/Impala would be more attractive to me personally if they were RWD...even better with a V8.

But I know for them to have continued mass appeal, FWD is probably preferable.
Old May 16, 2003 | 03:54 PM
  #4  
It's Cochese!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 268
From: Kennesaw, GA
I think the Monte should be dropped. The main success for it is NASCAR sales, and you can do that with almost any car (as long as you don't try to pass off a four door Taurus for a WCC.
Old May 16, 2003 | 03:56 PM
  #5  
USHotRod's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 639
From: Anchorage, AK
Wheres the "would consider both if it was a V8, RWD, and hauled AYYASS" option?
Old May 16, 2003 | 04:49 PM
  #6  
Eric Bryant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,400
From: Michigan's left coast
I'd take either car as a RWD vehicle. The lack of a V8 wouldn't bother me as long as the 3.8 L SC motor was bumped up to its full potential; with the use of a 5L50E or the Getrag 75mm gearboxes, the engine shouldn't be limited by the tranmission any longer.

Oddly enough, this is a similar concept to what Chrysler is doing with the LX RWD replacement/suppliment for the LH platform.
Old May 17, 2003 | 08:46 AM
  #7  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
I would perfer RWD... would make my car even better.
Old May 17, 2003 | 05:04 PM
  #8  
johnsocal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,911
From: Southern California (SoCal)
Give me a good looking 340HP+ V8 RWD Impala Coupe with real back seats and keep @ $30,000 and I would most likely buy it (of course if there is no new Camaro in 07)
Old May 17, 2003 | 06:07 PM
  #9  
Meccadeth's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,472
From: South Bend, Indiana
I chose Monte Carlo because they look so much cooler and I see the Impala now adays as being more family carish (even if it was RWD).

Great pole.
Old May 17, 2003 | 10:46 PM
  #10  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by Eric Bryant
I'd take either car as a RWD vehicle. The lack of a V8 wouldn't bother me as long as the 3.8 L SC motor was bumped up to its full potential; with the use of a 5L50E or the Getrag 75mm gearboxes, the engine shouldn't be limited by the tranmission any longer.

I could be happy with that too.

Also, I wonder what the manufacturing cost of the SC 3800 is compared to an LS1?
Old May 18, 2003 | 04:33 PM
  #11  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Isn't the S/C 3800 capable of something like 300HP?

It's too bad they can't mate that engine with a trans that will let it run at its full potential
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
93 RedBird
Fuel and Ignition
4
Nov 15, 2015 08:24 AM
IndyZman
Cars For Sale
3
Oct 22, 2015 02:17 PM
95chwagon
Parts For Sale
5
Oct 16, 2015 12:24 PM
WobblySausage
Drivetrain
4
Oct 7, 2015 10:09 AM
SergheiS
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
5
Sep 29, 2015 08:56 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 AM.