View Poll Results: If current M/C & Impala was on a RWD chassis, would your view of them change?
Wouldn't buy a RWD Monte Carlo or Impala regardless



2
5.71%
Wouldn't consider RWD M/C or Impala w/o a V8 option



5
14.29%
Would consider a RWD Monte Carlo



17
48.57%
Would consider a RWD Impala



11
31.43%
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll
Yep.....it's another poll (Impala & M/C related)
Yep.....it's another poll (Impala & M/C related)
Impala by almost every account is a great if ugly car. Monte Carlo, like the Impala is also a well made, high content, relatively cheap car. Both cars also are in the same market where they always have been.
Most of the complaints about the cars results from the flawed perception that the Impala name means performance (no doubt created from the '94-'97 SSs), and the fact that since there's no Camaro, everyone's focus is now on Monte Carlo (even though it was never a hot car... even the mid 80s version).
In the early 90s GM looked at making a version of the V-car here in the US which would have come out under the late 90s Buick & possibly the Impala & Monte Carlo as well.
With just this change, and no other, would your perception of Monte Carlo & Impala have changed, and would you have more likely bought one (even with the current engine lineup)?
Most of the complaints about the cars results from the flawed perception that the Impala name means performance (no doubt created from the '94-'97 SSs), and the fact that since there's no Camaro, everyone's focus is now on Monte Carlo (even though it was never a hot car... even the mid 80s version).
In the early 90s GM looked at making a version of the V-car here in the US which would have come out under the late 90s Buick & possibly the Impala & Monte Carlo as well.
With just this change, and no other, would your perception of Monte Carlo & Impala have changed, and would you have more likely bought one (even with the current engine lineup)?
I'd take either car as a RWD vehicle. The lack of a V8 wouldn't bother me as long as the 3.8 L SC motor was bumped up to its full potential; with the use of a 5L50E or the Getrag 75mm gearboxes, the engine shouldn't be limited by the tranmission any longer.
Oddly enough, this is a similar concept to what Chrysler is doing with the LX RWD replacement/suppliment for the LH platform.
Oddly enough, this is a similar concept to what Chrysler is doing with the LX RWD replacement/suppliment for the LH platform.
Originally posted by Eric Bryant
I'd take either car as a RWD vehicle. The lack of a V8 wouldn't bother me as long as the 3.8 L SC motor was bumped up to its full potential; with the use of a 5L50E or the Getrag 75mm gearboxes, the engine shouldn't be limited by the tranmission any longer.
I'd take either car as a RWD vehicle. The lack of a V8 wouldn't bother me as long as the 3.8 L SC motor was bumped up to its full potential; with the use of a 5L50E or the Getrag 75mm gearboxes, the engine shouldn't be limited by the tranmission any longer.
Also, I wonder what the manufacturing cost of the SC 3800 is compared to an LS1?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WobblySausage
Drivetrain
4
Oct 7, 2015 10:09 AM


