Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

What performance options should the "base" F5 have?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 31, 2003 | 07:19 AM
  #46  
Joe K. 96 Zeee!!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,531
Originally posted by SNEAKY NEIL
So what about a limited slip differential.....................should it be standard?
I guess I am going to say that it should be standard.
Oh, heck yes!! My 98 V6 was harder to drive in slippery conditions than my Z28 because of this. If the auto shifted during a turn in the rain and you had just a bit too much gas than there was a chance of losing the rear end....I had to be extrememtly cautious in my V6.

Limited Slip Standard. No question.
Old Jul 31, 2003 | 07:31 AM
  #47  
SNEAKY NEIL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,072
From: Lilburn, GA, USA
Yeah, I also forgot to mention that the Formula is bad in crappy weather becasue of this deficiency. I was going to ask how the 3.8 Camaros did because I have never driven one, just the 3.4 that I used to own. And if the 3.8 had problems, them the new base car would have it worse.
Old Jul 31, 2003 | 09:15 AM
  #48  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
During an interview with John Heinricy (F-car chief engineer), afew years ago...he said he was considering making available a 1LE type package on the base V6 4th gen.

I always thought that was a neat idea...eventhough it never saw fruition. I could imagine such a package really interesting autocrossers .....especially if they didn't want to spend the bucks on a *Z/28 1LE.



****EDIT: But of course we all agree that future Z/28's should incorporating all 1LE gear as part of "the package"........right?****

Last edited by Z284ever; Jul 31, 2003 at 09:34 AM.
Old Jul 31, 2003 | 09:51 AM
  #49  
Joe K. 96 Zeee!!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,531
future Z/28's should incorporating all 1LE gear as part of "the package"........right?****
A little off topic...but I'd agree conditionaly...

If Z/28 is a purpose built performer/road racer than we also need a more "comfy" model to incorporate both equipment that people wouldn't want on a Z/28 type car and a suspension that isn't bone jaring.
Old Jul 31, 2003 | 10:01 AM
  #50  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by Joe K. 96 Zeee!!
A little off topic...but I'd agree conditionaly...

If Z/28 is a purpose built performer/road racer than we also need a more "comfy" model to incorporate both equipment that people wouldn't want on a Z/28 type car and a suspension that isn't bone jaring.
I agree completely and unconditionally.
Old Jul 31, 2003 | 11:56 AM
  #51  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Originally posted by Z284ever
During an interview with John Heinricy (F-car chief engineer), afew years ago..
[troll]

John Heinricy, eh? Hmm... don't .... trust...the.....guy.....who .....has.... RICY as part of his name.

[/troll]
Old Jul 31, 2003 | 12:05 PM
  #52  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally posted by muckz
[troll]

John Heinricy, eh? Hmm... don't .... trust...the.....guy.....who .....has.... RICY as part of his name.

[/troll]
Old Jul 31, 2003 | 12:48 PM
  #53  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by muckz
[troll]

John Heinricy, eh? Hmm... don't .... trust...the.....guy.....who .....has.... RICY as part of his name.

[/troll]
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F'n1996Z28SS
Cars For Sale
8
Aug 23, 2023 11:19 PM
DirtyDaveW
Forced Induction
13
Dec 1, 2016 05:37 PM
carl.froehlich
LT1 Based Engine Tech
6
Mar 13, 2015 12:38 AM
pimpss96
LT1 Based Engine Tech
4
Feb 12, 2015 01:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 AM.