Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

What performance options should the "base" F5 have?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 08:56 PM
  #31  
SNEAKY NEIL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,072
From: Lilburn, GA, USA
You can't really compare the base Camaro with a 350z. All models have the same engine, trans, and things like that so it is like a Z28 with just upgraded suspention and all that. The 350z is really just one model with different options.

I think a suspention package is good for the base car because there still are people out there that can not afford a Z28 for various reasons and have to get a base model. Also, there will be kids whose parents will buy them a car and since the kid has to get a base model, he/she can opt for a sporty package that will let them have a more pleasant driving experience. Before I got my Z28, I could not afford the inssurance and I had to get a V6. So I got a 94' M5(used). I loved that car and would have liked to have the Y87 package if it was available.

I just think it would be a good thing so people don't feel like they are "getting stuck" with a base model.
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 09:50 PM
  #32  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by bigsteve7
I dont think its really necessary for a performance base model to have an upgraded suspension. If you want performance, go for the Z28 or SS. Why not just make the base model already have a decent suspension from teh get go?
You're right it should. But I don't see anything wrong with offering an upgrade for about $500-$800. It would make the base model alittle special.
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 09:54 PM
  #33  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Wow, so many different opinions, but we see to be concluding that the base model should have 17" as optional.

Then, Z28/SS should have 17" standard, with 18" as optional.


On the topic of turning... What makes a wheel hard to turn is the width, not so much the rim height. The wider the front tire, the harder it is to turn.
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 09:59 PM
  #34  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by muckz
Wow, so many different opinions, but we see to be concluding that the base model should have 17" as optional.


I'd say that you're right.

Put that in the "DONE" folder.
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 10:22 PM
  #35  
SNEAKY NEIL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,072
From: Lilburn, GA, USA
Agreed!
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 10:22 PM
  #36  
unvc92camarors's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,769
From: cinci
when i say turn, you do know i mean like rotate?
not like going into a corner and turning
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 10:33 PM
  #37  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Originally posted by unvc92camarors
when i say turn, you do know i mean like rotate?
not like going into a corner and turning
OK now I know what you meant. Well, you are right because I assume that as we go up in rim size, the weight increases. Assuming, though, that we could use some lightweight materials for the larger rims and if we could keep the weight increase to a minimal (if at all), then I do not see any impact when it comes to rotational/centrifugal forces.

Someone who went from stock rims on F4 to 315/35-R17 wheels measured a 6 or 7 HP loss on the dyno. That's at the rear wheels! But it does help with traction, no doubt about it. Check it out, looks good:

http://u2.netgate.net/~jshapiro/z28/315s/index.html

edit: pardon me, the loss was of 3.6 HP and 3.5 lb/ft. He widened his rims, not replaced them. Here's the link:

http://www.ws6.com/wheels.htm

Last edited by muckz; Jul 29, 2003 at 10:44 PM.
Old Jul 29, 2003 | 11:06 PM
  #38  
Burmite's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 581
From: New York, NY
The base model needs 17" wheels stock, a base V6 with a deal installed supercharger like with the ecotec. The SS/Z28 needs 18" wheels stock. The base model needs to be desirable and I also think that it could use a factory optioned sport suspension system.
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 07:22 AM
  #39  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Eh... I dunno about all this with 17"ers on a base model.

That is going to increase price of the base car (something everyone agrees has to hit it's target), plus make those who use the car shell out bigger bucks when they need to buy new tires.

16"ers are more logical here, IMO.
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 04:03 PM
  #40  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
18" rims are too much and unneccesary IMO.
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 08:36 PM
  #41  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
These 18's are too much?
http://www.tirerack.com/upgrade_gara...&autoYear=2002


EDIT: You must manually click on the 18" wheels.

Last edited by Z284ever; Jul 30, 2003 at 08:39 PM.
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 09:37 PM
  #42  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
Yes.
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 11:32 PM
  #43  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
"What performance options should the "base" F5 have?"

To stay relevant to the post, 18's have no place on the base car.

17's maybe as an option. Standard should be 16's.

The base care shoudl have some sort of performance package that is better than what Y87 was. The only important thing you really got was a LSD, and 3.42's if you drove an auto. Some kind of engine enhancement would be nice. Maybe have a different cam. At least with the 3800 Series II (L36) there is much room to improve performace considering the wimpy cam it is given from the factory. A GM backed supercharger package would have been great. This is the application where it was needed moreso than on such cars as the Grand AM.
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 11:42 PM
  #44  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Originally posted by Z284ever
These 18's are too much?
http://www.tirerack.com/upgrade_gara...&autoYear=2002


EDIT: You must manually click on the 18" wheels.
Wow, they actually do look awesome.

People, people. All we are saying is that 17" should be OPTIONAL on the base model, NOT standard. Hence if buyers want low cost base model they will not be charged for 17". But the ones that want those rims - well, they pay an upgrade fee and get them.
Old Jul 31, 2003 | 07:11 AM
  #45  
SNEAKY NEIL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,072
From: Lilburn, GA, USA
So what about a limited slip differential.....................should it be standard? I am thinking that with increased power and maybe a reduction in weight, this might be necessary. In my girlfriends 90' TBI Formula, the car does not have the limited slip and it really hurts the car. I can't give it any gas from low speeds around a turn without it spinning like crazy. Also, unless it is on a really good surface, you can't floor it from a standstill without the same problem. All of this from a car with an A4 and 2.73's. So if this is the case, a car with 50-600 more hp and probably the same level of torque would really benefit from this, especially for the manual.

I guess I am going to say that it should be standard. I am thinking that the added cost would only be about $100 if every Camaro had this. I don't like the idea of adding too much to the base car but this might be necessary...............or, they could make it part of the base performance package and try to get people to spend the extra dough on those options.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 AM.