Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

"We're finalizing the four-door showcar of the ATS first,"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 05:23 PM
  #1  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
"We're finalizing the four-door showcar of the ATS first,"

http://www.insideline.com/cadillac/a...the-works.html


2012 Cadillac ATS Still in the Works

Published Jan 27, 2010

Poor So-So Pretty Good Good Excellent 3 Ratings DETROIT — Cadillac is moving forward with the often-teased ATS, a model slated for a 2012 debut and aimed straight at the Infiniti G37, Mercedes C-Class and other German and Japanese competitors in the entry-premium segment.

"We're finalizing the four-door showcar of the ATS first," a well-placed source told Inside Line. "Then we'll follow quickly after with a wagon, a coupe and a convertible."

A debate regarding the convertible is whether to go with a folding hardtop or a sturdy weight- and space-saving ragtop in the style of the last Audi A4 and the new A5/S5. The source said Cadillac is currently "not too sure about the compromises of a folding hardtop."

Whether we see the ATS sedan prototype in October in Paris or December in Los Angeles remains unclear, but the source hinted at L.A. as the right spot for the biggest splash.

Inside Line says: The crisis and GM bankruptcy seemingly haven't made Cadillac falter in its plans. — Matt Davis, Correspondent
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 05:39 PM
  #2  
Good Ph.D's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,597
From: Mack and Bewick
This is excellent news. Hopefully the wagon looks decent and the convertible comes in at a decent price.
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 06:06 PM
  #3  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by Good Ph.D
This is excellent news. Hopefully the wagon looks decent and the convertible comes in at a decent price.
I hope that GM doesn't blow this.
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 09:15 PM
  #4  
poSSum's Avatar
Disciple
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,479
Originally Posted by Z284ever
[url]
A debate regarding the convertible is whether to go with a folding hardtop or a sturdy weight- and space-saving ragtop in the style of the last Audi A4 and the new A5/S5. The source said Cadillac is currently "not too sure about the compromises of a folding hardtop."
RAGTOP!

Think trunk space, roof down.

They can add the BMW 1-series to the list of perfectly executed softtops.
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 10:01 PM
  #5  
Ed 2001 SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 499
From: Miami, Fl USA
HARDTOP 'vert!
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 10:31 PM
  #6  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Wonder what the powertrains might be?

I really hope these cars are easy on fluff and heavy on "fun to drive".
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 12:06 AM
  #7  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
In regards to whether or not to... hard top should be the approach, taken. To arrive to the party in anything else is to arrive decidedly under-dressed.
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 02:21 AM
  #8  
Geoff Chadwick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,154
From: All around
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Wonder what the powertrains might be?

I really hope these cars are easy on fluff and heavy on "fun to drive".
Its interesting we heard not long ago that Alpha was to get major efforts on the steering, and now it seems that Alpha is 2 years away from a [showcar] and not a [concept car]. If we're lucky, that means a production version in later 2013. That could work well for GM.

The C350 tops the scales with 268hp from a 3.5L V6 and 3600lb. The G37 Sport tips in at 3640 and 328hp. The BMW 335i tips in with 300hp at 3605lb. The Merc and BMW start at 40k. The infinity Sport is $37k. That should help shed some light on pricing. Price it likely in the $32k-$38k range.

I'd bet we get the same two V6's (or very similar) offered in the CTS. Going with a V6 will over a boosted I4 will keep the center of mass farther back, which is critical to alpha. Roof height might be a smidge lower as well. Price the smaller one starting at $32k, the bigger at $34k or $35k. The bigger will snag 330hp, which will be good to compete with. If the chassis keeps in line with the competition, we're talking a 10"-12" shorter than the current CTS and likely 220lb lighter.

With the GenV launching in 2013, you could fire off an ATS-V in 2014. Compared to the BMW and Merc - the M3 with 414hp and 3726lb or the C63 AMG with 450hp at 3924lb (oof!). Who knows where an ATS-V would fall weight wise, but power would be like taking candy from a baby.

Could be a fun little bugger.
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 03:56 AM
  #9  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by Geoff Chadwick
Its interesting we heard not long ago that Alpha was to get major efforts on the steering, and now it seems that Alpha is 2 years away from a [showcar] and not a [concept car]. If we're lucky, that means a production version in later 2013. That could work well for GM.
I read the article as talking about an appearance at this year's Paris or LA autoshow, then an introduction in 2012.
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 05:38 AM
  #10  
VladimirSteel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 470
From: Stillwater, OK
the wagon seems like wasted time and money to me. Do the other manufacturers offer a wagon in a car this small? Maybe thats where theyre coming from. I love wagons, and if it wont cost much to develop and sell alongside the others than im all for it. The cts wagon is awesome, but i know there is a m5 wagon and a bigger merc wagon that its compeditive with.

oh and i'd say go with a ragtop. I love folding hardtops in just about every way, but it usually makes a trunk useless, and it seems to add way more to the cost than a normal ragtop. As long as its a quality top it will be fine... heck rolls-royce and bently use cloth tops, and if its good enough for them its good enough for caddy

Last edited by VladimirSteel; Jan 28, 2010 at 05:43 AM.
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 05:55 AM
  #11  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by VladimirSteel
the wagon seems like wasted time and money to me. Do the other manufacturers offer a wagon in a car this small? Maybe thats where theyre coming from.
Yes, though not all of them offer that wagon in the U.S. The ATS will be an ideal size for Cadillac to go global with, so they need a wagon to have a full line in Europe.
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 07:04 AM
  #12  
poSSum's Avatar
Disciple
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,479
Originally Posted by SSbaby
... hard top should be the approach, taken. To arrive to the party in anything else is to arrive decidedly under-dressed.
I'm with Vlad ....

Originally Posted by VladimirSteel

heck rolls-royce and bently use cloth tops, and if its good enough for them its good enough for caddy
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 07:55 AM
  #13  
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,650
From: Indianapolis, IN
The only well-done hardtop I can think of belongs to the Mazda Miata Touring. It adds something like 60 or 70 lbs, IIRC, and because it is enclosing such a small space, it is able to fold in two and fit in the same hole, just in front of the trunk, as the soft top standard on other Miatas. Otherwise, hardtops SUCK, especially when the car has a back seat. That makes for a whole lot of extra real estate to cover, and a whole lot more top that must somehow be folded / stowed. The hardtop G37 convertible is over 4000 lbs! Same for the 3 Series, droptop, I believe, and the idea of a 4000 lb 3 Series simply blows my mind.

As Vladimir pointed out, Bentley and Rolls can use soft tops. I say let Caddy use one too.

Make it a well-insulated (quiet), multi-layer soft top and reap the weight savings.
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 09:48 AM
  #14  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
G37 is a bigger car than 3-series or C-class. Its competition appears to be CTS.

However. BMW offers 3-series wagon, and Audi has A4 avant. Not sure if C-class here sells in a wagon form. I'm undecided if Cadillac should make ATS wagon.

As for convertible... Ragtop please. Lighter, more spacious, cheaper. Need say more?

What puzzles me with G37 convertible, first, yes, its weight, and second, the performance it is able to deliver. I'm dumbfounded how a 4000 lbs vehicle with a V6 engine that produces 330 HP can do 0-60 in less than 5.5 seconds. And quarter mile at around 14 flat. It has similar torque number to LT1 Camaro, and yet is 500 lbs heavier. Something is not adding up.
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 11:26 AM
  #15  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Hardtop convertible. I don't buy the "a ragtop is lighter" argument. Its a Cadillac, not a Corvette or a Camaro.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 AM.