Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Volvo may receive lifeline from Belgian government

Old May 27, 2009 | 10:19 AM
  #1  
95redLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
Volvo may receive lifeline from Belgian government

I'm sure this one wont get mentioned by the media either......

Despite Volvo being a Swedish-based company, the trouble stricken carmaker may have to look to the Belgian government for financial aid to help keep it on its feet. Volvo currently operates a plant in the Flanders region of Belgium, and the Flemish Premier Kris Peeters has been in talks with Volvo CEO Stephen Odell in regards to securing loan guarantees for the carmaker to the tune of €300 million ($418 million).

Belgian media outlets are reporting that Volvo and the Flemish Premier are hoping to work out a deal by June 7, just days before the region’s elections. Should the loan guarantees go ahead, there will be restrictions on where the cash can be used, with the Flemish government stating to Automotive News that the guarantees would not apply for any "factories anywhere other than in Flanders".

Securing a future for its auto workers appears to be the Flemish government's top priority at this point, and in this vein it will be examining a business plan from Volvo, as well as wanting to figure out a deal that takes into account a possible sale of Volvo. Peeters stated that he would require "firm commitments" and assurances about "Volvo's long-term future" before he could agree to any loans.

While Volvo is actually based in Sweden, talks with the Swedish government are failing to progress following a strategic review from Ford that left Volvo in an uncertain position. The European Investment Bank has already given the ailing company a loan of €200 million ($279 million), but it requires significantly more funding to help it stay in shape.

As for the likely sale of Volvo, there are reportedly five bidders interested in the company and a decision on a final buyer may be announced as early as next month.
http://www.motorauthority.com/volvo-...overnment.html
Old May 27, 2009 | 06:19 PM
  #2  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Interesting. It's becoming a trend lately.

But on a slightly different note... how many here know that VW is 20% state owned. Yes, the most popular car maker in Europe and destined to be number two automaker (to Toyota) is providing good returns to Germany.
Old May 28, 2009 | 07:50 AM
  #3  
El Duce's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 429
Not my money so I don't care. Also, $418m <<<<< $20 BILLION with GM about to get another $40 BILLION from the Canadian and US government.

You guys are really grasping here lately.
Old May 28, 2009 | 09:03 AM
  #4  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by El Duce
Not my money so I don't care. Also, $418m <<<<< $20 BILLION with GM about to get another $40 BILLION from the Canadian and US government.
It is going to be your money if all that is left is foreign cars to buy.
Old May 28, 2009 | 09:18 AM
  #5  
jmsjags's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 101
From: Richmond, VA
Originally Posted by Z28x
It is going to be your money if all that is left is foreign cars to buy.
he has a point. $400 million is chump change compared to what GM and Chrysler have already WASTED AWAY. now they need EVEN MORE
Old May 28, 2009 | 11:07 AM
  #6  
R377's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,712
From: Ontario
So I guess Ford can no longer claim they do not want government bailouts.
Old May 28, 2009 | 06:09 PM
  #7  
94LightningGal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,178
From: Payson, AZ USA
You are so right................... $418 million, from the Belgian government, for a specific Belgian Volvo plant, that will be sold with the rest of Volvo, is EXACTLY the same as the $19.4 Billion that GM has gotten from us (you know, us US taxpayers), and the pending $50 billion plus that they will get after BK................ also from us.

Yeppers, exactly the same.
Old May 28, 2009 | 06:15 PM
  #8  
R377's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,712
From: Ontario
Originally Posted by 94LightningGal
You are so right................... $418 million, from the Belgian government, for a specific Belgian Volvo plant, that will be sold with the rest of Volvo, is EXACTLY the same as the $19.4 Billion that GM has gotten from us (you know, us US taxpayers), and the pending $50 billion plus that they will get after BK................ also from us.

Yeppers, exactly the same.
I don't recall where I said it was exactly the same, or for that matter even made mention of GM

The fact remains, Volvo is still owned by Ford, and they are seeking bailout money from a government. Are you disputing that?
Old May 28, 2009 | 06:18 PM
  #9  
super83Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,214
From: City of Champions, MA, USA
What you all forget is its all based on the size of the company. I would like to see the ratios of loans/bailouts to total revenue for all these companies including GM. $1 million is nothing to GM, but that is a fortune to one of us.
Old May 28, 2009 | 07:59 PM
  #10  
94LightningGal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,178
From: Payson, AZ USA
Originally Posted by R377
I don't recall where I said it was exactly the same, or for that matter even made mention of GM

The fact remains, Volvo is still owned by Ford, and they are seeking bailout money from a government. Are you disputing that?
Yes, Ford still owns Volvo. The money from Belgium will assist Ford in the selling of Volvo, and will help to insure that the new owners do not close the plant.

BTW, noone has ever claimed that Ford has not sought assistance from ANY government, as there have been articles on this for some time. They have continually said that they have not, and will not seek assistance from the US government.

In other words, they will not have their hands in MY pockets.
Old May 28, 2009 | 09:00 PM
  #11  
El Duce's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 429
Originally Posted by R377
I don't recall where I said it was exactly the same, or for that matter even made mention of GM


The purpose of these types of posts are clear as day. Some people are trying to deflect the spotlight, but in this case it would be no different than if a little brother who just set the house on fire cried fowl and pointed out that his little sister stepped on the rose garden on the way out of the burning house.
Old May 28, 2009 | 09:09 PM
  #12  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by El Duce


The purpose of these types of posts are clear as day. Some people are trying to deflect the spotlight, but in this case it would be no different than if a little brother who just set the house on fire cried fowl and pointed out that his little sister stepped on the rose garden on the way out of the burning house.
And the purpose of your posts are clear as day, to be an anti-GM troll on a GM fan site.
Old May 28, 2009 | 09:39 PM
  #13  
super83Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,214
From: City of Champions, MA, USA
Originally Posted by Z28x
And the purpose of your posts are clear as day, to be an anti-GM troll on a GM fan site.
Old May 28, 2009 | 09:41 PM
  #14  
El Duce's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 429
Originally Posted by Z28x
And the purpose of your posts are clear as day, to be an anti-GM troll on a GM fan site.


Oh c'mon! I love GM cars and have always considered myself a GM guy all the back to crossfire injection systems. Hell I can remember the very day my father pulled into the driveway in my uncle's red Corvette. But that doesn't mean I have blind loyalty to a company that has failed, is failing and will soon be under the control of the federal government which was acquired in what most on here would be considered in a way that is counter of our most basic economic principles and in a manner that we as a country have criticized for decades when it happened in other countries. If anything I'm looking at this is much more objective manner than some of the other people on here.

So why don't you counter my point instead of just calling me names?

Last edited by El Duce; May 28, 2009 at 09:49 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MDZ28
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
11
Sep 24, 2015 09:15 AM
USN06
New Member Introduction
0
Sep 7, 2015 03:30 PM
CARiD
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Sep 7, 2015 08:21 AM
Anon
Fuel and Ignition
4
Jul 23, 2015 12:18 PM
asilomar244
LT1 Based Engine Tech
17
Jul 12, 2015 05:53 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 PM.