Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Turnaround Pressure Intensifies on Chrysler Chief

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 09:44 AM
  #1  
Robert_Nashville's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,938
Turnaround Pressure Intensifies on Chrysler Chief

Continuing questions about Chrysler's future and what they might do to turn it around...

Originally Posted by Wall Street Journal
By MATHIAS KRUST and JOHN D. STOLL
November 10, 2006

The head of DaimlerChrysler AG's Chrysler Group is coming under increasing pressure to turn around the U.S. unit quickly, although the auto maker probably won't have a full-blown restructuring plan in place until the first quarter of next year, people familiar with the matter said.

For now, Chrysler chief Tom LaSorda appears to have the support of DaimlerChrysler Chief Executive Dieter Zetsche. But Mr. LaSorda's standing with the German auto maker's supervisory board -- the equivalent of a U.S. company's board of directors -- could weaken if Chrysler makes little progress toward profitability in the fourth quarter, these people said.

DaimlerChrysler expects its U.S. arm to come close to breaking even in the fourth quarter after reporting a €1.16 billion ($1.48 billion) third-quarter operating loss. But Chrysler faces an uphill climb. In October, the division's U.S. sales fell 3%. By comparison, sales at rivals General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co. rose 17% and 8%, respectively, last month.

Mr. LaSorda has told his management team at Chrysler's Auburn Hills, Mich., headquarters that his job and theirs are at stake in Chrysler's turnaround, people familiar with the matter said.

A DaimlerChrysler spokesman declined to comment and said Mr. LaSorda was unavailable.

All three of Detroit's auto makers are suffering from increasing competition from more cost-efficient auto makers like Toyota Motor Corp. and declining demand for the most profitable big pickup trucks and sport-utility vehicles.

Mr. Zetsche is supposed to outline at least the beginnings of a turnaround plan for Chrysler at a board meeting in December, and a team of executives from the company's Mercedes division are helping Mr. LaSorda identify ways to streamline Chrysler's operations.

One measure under consideration is the shuttering of a plant in Newark, Del., that makes a slow-selling Dodge SUV and operates only eight hours a day. But any plan to make major shifts in production and plant operations could take weeks to hammer out and may not be firm enough to seek the board's approval until sometime in early 2007, these people said.

"There is tremendous pressure on [Mr. LaSorda], but the whole thing about this recovery plan is that we're not going to be in a position to implement structural changes until the first quarter," a person close to Mr. LaSorda said. "There is a very intricate process being put into place, and that's going to take some time. We won't be able to tell you this quarter if there's going to be a plant that goes down. We won't know that until the first quarter."

Mr. LaSorda was a close lieutenant of Mr. Zetsche's when the latter executive was running Chrysler. When Mr. Zetsche was named CEO of the parent company last year, Mr. LaSorda was chosen as his successor at Chrysler, and the two men celebrated over champagne while flying back to Michigan from DaimlerChrysler's German headquarters.
Chrysler's third-quarter operating loss resulted from slumping sales, lower production and bloated inventories. Parent DaimlerChrysler remained profitable thanks to its Mercedes, truck and financial-services divisions.

For the past two months, Mr. LaSorda has been scrambling to increase sales and cut costs in hopes of staving off another loss in the fourth quarter.

In September, Mr. LaSorda traveled to eight U.S. cities to urge dealers to help the company by ordering from Chrysler's stockpile of unsold vehicles. So far, however, few dealers have stepped up ordering.

Chrysler also added heavy rebates to move the slowest-selling models in its lineup.
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 02:07 PM
  #2  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Chrysler overproduced and forced the cars on their dealers with veiled threats to hold back allotments of hot models.

What do they expect the reaction is going to be when they fly around asking dealers to adsorb this excess after how they were treated?
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 06:40 PM
  #3  
number77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
How possible would it be for DCX to break off the Chrysler/Dodge/American plants, assign someone to control it, and then piece it out to stock holders?
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 07:35 AM
  #4  
Caps94ZODG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,748
From: New England
it was holding MB together for a little while and now that its doing the same as the others they want to kill it..

I still say bring back the HEMI guys...It got people thinking and I think it was great marketing...and it sold..
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 09:16 PM
  #5  
mastrdrver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,817
From: O-Town
What about Wolfgang Bernhard coming back to DC? Since it has been announced he is steping down from VW, there has been rumors about him coming back to DC.

Just a though.
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 08:08 PM
  #6  
5thgen69camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,802
From: Annapolis MD
Originally Posted by guionM
Chrysler overproduced and forced the cars on their dealers with veiled threats to hold back allotments of hot models.

What do they expect the reaction is going to be when they fly around asking dealers to adsorb this excess after how they were treated?
I hope GM doesnt over produce. Thats what scares me with the alpha and the hinting at pick your style. If there is a 3 series sedan and coupe then a solstice great. Throw a Commadore and a midsize(MAYBE) and youve got yourself a lineup. but I get images of a RWD ecotec brand and it scares me that theres not a market for it. I dont care if its the Camaro, I hope NOTHING is overproduced for GM's sake. On the other hand to get a Camaro on the cheap J/K
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 11:47 PM
  #7  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
I'll give GM the credit here. Chrysler's problem seems the result of people in middle management and marketing who took a heavy handed position over dealers to keep production numbers up, without listening to the dealers in the least.

Chrysler used their hot new models to force dealers to take slow and nearly impossible to sell ones.

Probally went something like:
"if you want a bigger allotment of 300Cs and PT Cruisers, you need to order a few dozen more Sebring sedans & Dakotas.... and if you aren't pushing more loaded base V6 300s or V6 Dakotas to keep our CAFE numbers up, forget about getting an SRT8 or a convertible PT."
Old Nov 14, 2006 | 11:55 PM
  #8  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
I think this points to a bigger problem. When you have influience from Germany trying to run a company here in a different economy I think they miss the boat. Chrysler has always been feast or famine but its not usually this low on the down years. Not to mention they have enough top selling types to combat these losses. Its mismanagement plain and simple.
Old Nov 16, 2006 | 07:46 PM
  #9  
RMC_SS_LDO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 241
From: Kings Bay, Georgia
Originally Posted by guionM
Probally went something like:
"if you want a bigger allotment of 300Cs and PT Cruisers, you need to order a few dozen more Sebring sedans & Dakotas.... and if you aren't pushing more loaded base V6 300s or V6 Dakotas to keep our CAFE numbers up, forget about getting an SRT8 or a convertible PT."
I'd be curious to see their overall numbers (their real numbers) on sales across the board.

I've been snooping at local dealers toying with the idea of a 300 SRT-8 (a tad more than I can afford for now). They have had a ton of them on the lots eating hay for over 7 months! If I could keep from getting raped on the trade and could actually get a good deal, I'd do it!

It just seems like the Mopars are stale across the board and the new stuff (Compass and Aspen leap to mind) are a huge swind-and-a-miss. They need to get their edge back and take chances with really fresh products like the LX cars were when released.
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 01:51 AM
  #10  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by RMC_SS_LDO
I'd be curious to see their overall numbers (their real numbers) on sales across the board.

I've been snooping at local dealers toying with the idea of a 300 SRT-8 (a tad more than I can afford for now). They have had a ton of them on the lots eating hay for over 7 months! If I could keep from getting raped on the trade and could actually get a good deal, I'd do it!

It just seems like the Mopars are stale across the board and the new stuff (Compass and Aspen leap to mind) are a huge swind-and-a-miss. They need to get their edge back and take chances with really fresh products like the LX cars were when released.
I guess the SRT-8 sales depends on where you live. They still seem to be selling without much trouble in the bay area and in San Diego. And forget about finding a new Charger SRT-8.

Although it's a little too early to tell about the Aspen, it does fall into the "What the hell were they thinking??" mold with the Jeep Compass. I'm still not convinced the Sebring will be a hit, and although I like the new Avenger, I'm still pretty disgusted that Chrysler essentially just shrunk the Charger and put the Avenger name on it. I love the Charger's looks, and Charger is doing extremely well, but DCX just cheapened the Charger and took away it's unique identity in the process.

I've been completely thrilled with Chrysler over the 300, the Charger, the Liberty, the new Commander, and the Challenger, and the fact that their product pipeline is as full as it could possibly be. I still think Chrysler's in a very commanding position as far as upcoming new vehicles and cash reserve to get them to market, but that faith is by no means absolute.
Old Nov 17, 2006 | 02:45 AM
  #11  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Anyone else but me find it rather hilarious that last year, everyone was praising Chrysler's cars and how they run things, as GM was just seconds away from being taken over, torn apart and sold as scrap or some other doomsday prediction??
Not saying that GM is doing fantastic, but they took there lumps and seem to be slowly moving twards the light. Focus on GM is its upcoming product and technology, not how at any moment, they would file Chapter 11.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
350350
Fuel and Ignition
14
Aug 11, 2015 12:03 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Aug 7, 2015 01:26 PM
Boss002
Autocross and Road Racing Technique
2
Jul 24, 2015 10:47 AM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Jul 17, 2015 02:47 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
1
Jul 8, 2015 06:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 AM.