Tom Stephens:Our upcoming programs have aggressive mass targets
20" Cast. And they're lighter than 18" forged from what I've read.
We didn't necessarily want the RS package, but our 2010 Camaro SS certainly has it. This means 20-by-8-inch front and 20-by-9-inch rear cast-aluminum wheels that are painted, not chromed (welcome to the new century, Chevy)
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=156066
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=156066
Last edited by SSbaby; Sep 1, 2009 at 10:00 PM.
An OEM can't put "track" pads on a street car. I'm fine with that. I know you want to take your car off the showroom floor straight to the race track though. 
The ability to disperse heat is not just a function of rotor diameter. Vented rotors, slotted rotors, drilled rotors, curved vanes, straight vanes, thickness of the rotors on a vented rotor etc etc etc. For a rotor of a given mass, there are better ways to make it dissipate heat than make it larger in diameter.
FWIW though, for the same mass, a large diameter solid rotor will be a lot cheaper than a rotor that is vented with curved vanes.
That's a bad assumption. There are plenty of setups out there that will get more airflow with smaller wheels.

FWIW though, for the same mass, a large diameter solid rotor will be a lot cheaper than a rotor that is vented with curved vanes.
That's a bad assumption. There are plenty of setups out there that will get more airflow with smaller wheels.
The ability to disperse heat is not just a function of rotor diameter. Vented rotors, slotted rotors, drilled rotors, curved vanes, straight vanes, thickness of the rotors on a vented rotor etc etc etc. For a rotor of a given mass, there are better ways to make it dissipate heat than make it larger in diameter.
FWIW though, for the same mass, a large diameter solid rotor will be a lot cheaper than a rotor that is vented with curved vanes.
That's a bad assumption. There are plenty of setups out there that will get more airflow with smaller wheels.
FWIW though, for the same mass, a large diameter solid rotor will be a lot cheaper than a rotor that is vented with curved vanes.
That's a bad assumption. There are plenty of setups out there that will get more airflow with smaller wheels.
But you must agree that bigger rotors are sometimes the most economical way to upgrade brakes. Cross drilling has it's problems and vented rotors are climbing up the expensive ladder. Bigger rotors don't suffer as much from heat stress as much as smaller rotors, plain and simple. Brake pad material is another science but I doubt there'd be many happer customers if GM used a softer brake pad. Brake dust does not look good on those sexy Camaro wheels.
Sometimes the best way isn't necessarily the most expensive way. And GM's smallblock is proof of that notion.
I certainly agree that larger rotors can be more economical - and "best" from GM's point of view just might be huge rotors look great and they are cheaper (and take less time to design) than a more elaborate brake setup -- but huge rotors are not required to stop a big car - just the most convenient way to do it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RX Speed Works
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
3
Oct 1, 2015 10:19 PM
tommalcolm
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
2
Sep 11, 2015 03:39 PM




