Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Take a hard look gents, cause right there...

Old Mar 13, 2003 | 10:32 AM
  #31  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
It's really amazing how some things change & how fast they change.

I believe it was barely a month ago that some of you bemoaned the possibility of the next Camaro being based on the Solstice feeling that the chassis was so weak that it could barely support itself, let alone a V8, then get in & drive V8 f-bodies that almost flex in half when you put them on a garage lift!

Bringing back an arguement from the dead (since PacerX, myself, and about 2 others here who brought this up & were pounced on by some of you ), a chassis that is being engineered can be made for any potential contingency. The Solstice chassis (or Bengal, if some of you still feel screamish with that idea) can easily be engineered to accept high performance engines, and I'm certain that is exactly what is happening.

I believe PacerX (responsible party, forgive me if I name the wrong person) pointed this out awhile back that the RWD components being sorced out for the Solstice cars are top drawer stuff, and anything that can hold both a inline 4 and a V6, can also hold a V8.

I think it's pretty significant that it seems f-body plans seems to have come back to the front burner as soon as this "tubular" chassis (love that name ) goes into final development. Not saying it's Camaro, but it's still interesting nonetheless.
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 11:15 AM
  #32  
Chris 96 WS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,801
From: Nashville, TN
Originally posted by guionM
Bringing back an arguement from the dead (since PacerX, myself, and about 2 others here who brought this up & were pounced on by some of you ), a chassis that is being engineered can be made for any potential contingency. The Solstice chassis (or Bengal, if some of you still feel screamish with that idea) can easily be engineered to accept high performance engines, and I'm certain that is exactly what is happening.

I believe PacerX (responsible party, forgive me if I name the wrong person) pointed this out awhile back that the RWD components being sorced out for the Solstice cars are top drawer stuff, and anything that can hold both a inline 4 and a V6, can also hold a V8.
Would this not then be the explanation for why the Solstice fattened up so much from concept to production weight spec?
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 12:18 PM
  #33  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally posted by IZ28
Not a thing about that car says "Camaro."
I don't know if the planet alignment is out of whack or what, but I agree with IZ28.
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 12:21 PM
  #34  
PacerX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
The photoshop guys can make it look like a Camaro.

The important stuff is what is underneath, and all the right pieces are there. They last straw will be getting a V8 into a Bengal - and then the puzzle just falls together.
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 12:29 PM
  #35  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally posted by PacerX
The photoshop guys can make it look like a Camaro.

The important stuff is what is underneath, and all the right pieces are there. They last straw will be getting a V8 into a Bengal - and then the puzzle just falls together.
What's underneath is most important sure. But from what I see, I don't want one body panel from an Opel on a 5th Gen Camaro. The Opel looks nice enough, it just doesn't look like a Camaro. Use the chassis if it is suitable and do a clean-sheet body.
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 12:38 PM
  #36  
phantasm99's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 172
danno02SS,

Great work!!

I hate to be a pain in the a$$ but could you please do a photo chop of that thing with a Camaro SS hood scoop?

I think adding the scoop would really make the car...

Thanks
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 02:23 PM
  #37  
cmc's Avatar
cmc
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 681
From: Houston, TX USA
Photochop nothing. Camaro should (and will) be a clean sheet design on this chassis. Plain and simple. Now if you guys want to let the tight and nimble look (G35 coupe) going on your drawings, I'd love it.
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 02:35 PM
  #38  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
I am really interested in the mechanical bits here. I get the impression that there are those who could care less on what Camaro is built on....as long as it can be fitted with a V8. I've been waiting a long time for Camaro to get a world class chassis...and if this will provide it....GREAT! If not, it shouldn't be considered.

As far as that Opel concept goes....it's nice enough....but I wouldn't want to see any body panels or lines transferred to a new Camaro.
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 02:43 PM
  #39  
hotrodtodd74's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 185
Just remember that some Hot Rodders/ Custom Car builders out there build tubular chassis for their custom cars and they put V8's into those.

By the way, since the issue of how to build multiple cars on one chassis has been discussed as a way to make a legit business case to bring back our Camaro, here is one way it could be done. And it woudn't be on the same platform as the GTO. This tubular chassis could be the answer to our prayers!
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 04:19 PM
  #40  
95 Z/28 LT1's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,026
From: Japan
Originally posted by Z284ever
I've been waiting a long time for Camaro to get a world class chassis...and if this will provide it....GREAT! If not, it shouldn't be considered.

My sentiments exactly.
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 04:53 PM
  #41  
muckz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Doesn't this OPel resemble closely (especially C pillar) the concept of C6 that Road & Track did a couple of months ago?

Looks very similar to me.
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 06:03 PM
  #42  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
Originally posted by Z28Wilson
I don't know if the planet alignment is out of whack or what, but I agree with IZ28.
This has been happening more and more, by others too. I agree with what the other guys have been saying. IF the chassis is good/perfect for making a great Camaro and there isn't really any other choice, incredible. But, do not let it have ANY other similarities beyond that. We have spoken.
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 06:39 PM
  #43  
Burmite's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 581
From: New York, NY
I actually sorta like the look, but I believe that a better design can be created.
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 07:06 PM
  #44  
kacy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 256
From: IL
umm isnt that a 2 seater the camaro has always been a 4 seater not comfortable but 4 seats put in a different market then a corvette
Old Mar 13, 2003 | 07:43 PM
  #45  
cmc's Avatar
cmc
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 681
From: Houston, TX USA
Originally posted by kacy
umm isnt that a 2 seater the camaro has always been a 4 seater not comfortable but 4 seats put in a different market then a corvette
There are about 50 posts on this forum that talk about the four seater Buick Bengal that's going to be built on the Solstice platform.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 PM.