Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Superior Honda Quality in action...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 15, 2004 | 08:26 AM
  #46  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally posted by PaperTarget
Not to ruffle feathers, but...

"The side saddle fuel tank design installed in over 10 million trucks - all 1973-87 General Motors full-size pickups and cab-chassis trucks (pickups without beds) and some 1988-91 dual cab or RV chassis - is the worst auto crash fire defect in the history of the U.S. Department of Transportation."

"This is more than twenty times as many fatalities as in the infamous Ford Pinto. Despite a voluntary recall request from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in April 1993 (Attachment B) and an initial defect determination by Transportation Secretary Federico Pena in October 1994 (Attachment C), GM stubbornly refused to initiate a recall."

Now, there was some media attention about this, but I can see why. There was, however, not near the amount of attention given to this as was given to Ford's Pinto or Explorer issues, both of which pale in comparison. In fact, the grand total of all of Honda's and Ford's fire problems don't touch GM's side saddle fuel tank issue. I can post a link if you want full details...

Well, I did mention this in with the Explorer and the Crown Victoria situations in a previous reply in this thread.

I think this issue got A LOT of attention, though I do agree that Explorer got the most, by far.

I am not excusing the issue by any means... a problem is a problem... I was just saying how this Honda issue will fade away quickly, which is has already.... haven't heard a word about it and it's only been 1 week since the story first came out....
Old Jul 15, 2004 | 08:27 AM
  #47  
SNEAKY NEIL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,072
From: Lilburn, GA, USA
Maybe you could post that a few more times even though it has nothing to do with what we are talking about.
Old Jul 15, 2004 | 10:30 AM
  #48  
PaperTarget's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,029
Originally posted by SNEAKY NEIL
Maybe you could post that a few more times even though it has nothing to do with what we are talking about.
Well, since numerous people have talked about numerous things in this thread not dealing with the Honda issue and most ignored this one (mostly because it's GM), I thought it worth mentioning. Now, go jump on other people who are mentioning other non-topic issues.

Regardless, ANY problem that can cause a fire whether it be Ford or Honda or GM or anyone else, should be publicly acknowledged and recalled if possible.
Old Jul 15, 2004 | 11:32 AM
  #49  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
That Ford "Exploder" thing hit hard as I have people that wont go near Bridgestone just because they are made by Firestone. They look at me and say "I dont want my car to blow up!"
But when some young lady with a CRV came in on friday for an oil change, I told her to go to Honda because of the fires. She looked at me like I was nuts. She asked me about this fire thing, and I told her she should have gotten something in the mail about this. I told her to go on the internet and look up the CRV oil fires.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hal Fisher
Parts For Sale
0
Sep 30, 2015 09:03 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Sep 30, 2015 04:20 PM
CARiD
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Sep 30, 2015 05:44 AM
z28newbie
Site Help and Suggestions
1
Sep 9, 2015 10:26 AM
z28newbie
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
Sep 9, 2015 10:26 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 PM.