Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

SRT-8's to get 6.4L? 500 hp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 04:54 PM
  #46  
305fan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,308
From: Calgary
Originally Posted by mgreen
Well, you make a good point. However, in a Hotrod Magazine (or some similar publication), they compared a 6.1L Hemi (found in current SRT8s) to the early carbed 426 hemi. They made similar power. On the engine dyno the fuel injected 6.1L made either 450 or 455 hp.

So, if they used the SAE rating for today's 6.1L hemi, they might rate it at ~450hp.

That puts the 6.4L @ ~475, now add in small improvements, and ~500 is believable.

Mike
well keep in mind I am talking emmisons legal, fuel economy ect.

Alos it makes the 427 LS7 sound like its not really putting out--if it can only do 505 with 0.6L more displacement.
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 06:37 PM
  #47  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Originally Posted by 305fan
well keep in mind I am talking emmisons legal, fuel economy ect.

Alos it makes the 427 LS7 sound like its not really putting out--if it can only do 505 with 0.6L more displacement.
The LS7 is using a "baby" camshaft, for a 427 c.i. engine . That's what makes it 500 "streetable" HP . There are lots of smaller displacement engines making well over 500 HP, but no OEM could put one in a car, warranty it, and expect (average) people to enjoy driving them everyday . And their fuel economy would probably suck too.
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #48  
5thgen69camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,802
From: Annapolis MD
Does this mean the V10 is dead? I was wondering if there would be a V10 Challenger...
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 08:32 PM
  #49  
georgejetson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 689
They just put considerable effort and $ into revising the V10 for 2008. It's not dead. I haven't heard anything about it going into the Challenger, though.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 12:17 PM
  #50  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by 5thgen69camaro
Does this mean the V10 is dead? I was wondering if there would be a V10 Challenger...
V10 is FAR from dead. Viper=V10 just like Corvette=V8.
Forget about it going into a Challenger. It's essentially a hand made engine, and I don't see anyone dishing out 60-80K for a Challenger, just like I don't see anyone doing it for a Camaro, Mustang, or GTO.

Originally Posted by bossco
well that is if LSx motors are suddenly OHC multivalve VVT engines.

Theres nothing to study on an LSx motor, it's not some sort of revolutionary powerplant producing ungodly amounts of specific output on tree hugger friendly teddybear farts. The LSx motors are very refined OHV engines that prove without a doubt there is no replacement for displacement.
Thank You!

It's funny when you read posts about how Ford is studying or Chrysler took ideas from GM's LSx engines as if it's some "wunder-motor". Please!

GM, Ford, and Chrysler all have been making motors for roughly 100 years, and all 3 have top notch engineers working on their programs. The only difference is priorities. Ford's priority is on forged internals & overhead cams. GM's is on fuel economy and cost to manufacture. Chrysler's is cost to manufacture and performance. Change the priorities around between the manufacturers, and you get very different engines.

I'm more than certain that when the Boss motors come out, they will be OHC engines, probably in a 2 (maybe 3) and 4 valve layout with VVT. The big distinction between the MOD motor and the Boss motor being one of displacment with Ford probably going to oversquare and/or square bore/stroke ratio. Hell if all the Boss motors turned out to be were mod motors with a bigger bore/bore spacing and increased displacement that'd make a big difference in HP/TQ alone.

You're very close to being accurate.


Originally Posted by georgejetson
The 6.4 will have more than 500 hp. On the other hand, it will probably be more expensive than the equivalent GM offering, and we'll be getting into the question of "how big IS the $50k hi-po V8 muscle coupe market, anyway?"
Challenger SRT8 won't be $50K.

Originally Posted by Capn Pete
I wonder if they'll be successful with their goals? (sub-4000lbs, and GT500 killer). If so, then we "may" have something to worry about in the Camaro camp .

BUT, has the weight "goal" of the Camaro not been to stay "close" to the former ~3500 lbs model? (realistic #'s of ~3600 - 3700 lbs??). And I have faith in the LSx engines as far as power is concerned.

Well, I guess we wait and see what the Dodge boys come up with?
Chrysler is taking no prisoners with the SRT Challenger. While GM is setting the Camaro's up claim to fame to be a racing circuit car, the Challenger is going to be a drag racer.

This is pure speculation on my part, but taking what I know about the current SRT team at Chrysler, Chrysler's management's willingness to fully fund what they need, and the fact that unlike SVT (which has effectively been dissolved) and GMHP division (which is more generic and constrained), I'd say the Challenger is likely to be quicker than whatever Camaro GM brings to the party, while Camaro is going etch out Challenger and especially Mustang on race courses such as Nurbring and Laguna Seca.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 01:08 PM
  #51  
georgejetson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 689
Originally Posted by guionM
Challenger SRT8 won't be $50K.
With all due respect, I'll believe it when I see it.

MSRP on a GT500 with options is already in the mid-$40k range, and the current Charger SRT-8s as generally equipped are getting close to that (the last two I saw were both over $43k MSRP). Where will that be in two or three years? Consider also the ongoing hints from CG that they consider Challenger to be a premium product vs the Mustang and Camaro, presumably because of the larger interior. I bet MSRP on the typical top-performing (whatever they call it) Challenger as equipped by the average dealer will be north of $45k... unless GM chooses to offer a competitive product for significantly less. That's the big variable.

As an aside, it will be very interesting to see what they do to the LX rear on the hottest Challengers. The SRT-8s have already had trouble with breakage when using drag radials, much less slicks. Adding 100 hp or whatever won't exactly help.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 01:23 PM
  #52  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Originally Posted by guionM
V10 is FARwhile Camaro is going etch out Challenger and especially Mustang on race courses such as Nurbring and Laguna Seca.

I cannot say for the regular production mustang, but to handily beat the Boy and Man racers is saying alot. The cars were set up so well that the common perception is the boy racer had a horsepower advantage over the competition, in truth the boy racer had a very good chassis and was quicker than alot of cars (BMW & Porsche) through the turns allowing the mustangs to get through faster creating the illusion that they were just one trick ponies with alot of top end. Hopefully I can find a link to the post where this is discussed. The info is on a ferrarri forum and the guy who posted the information was one of the people who helped to set-up/campaign the boy racers. In a nutshell, the boy racers had some serious development resulting in a very sorted out chassis, despite being heavy and some issues with the rear brakes (stock size rear discs with a funky booster curve resulted in brakes that were cooked pretty fast). As for the HP advantage, the boy racers had comparable hp/wgt ratios to the competition.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 04:04 PM
  #53  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by georgejetson
With all due respect, I'll believe it when I see it.

MSRP on a GT500 with options is already in the mid-$40k range, and the current Charger SRT-8s as generally equipped are getting close to that (the last two I saw were both over $43k MSRP)...
Shelby GT500 stickers at $40,930.

$38,095 for the SRT Charger.

Whatever options you pile on or whatever dealers pile on top is irrelevent. There's a Tahoe nearby going for $55K. Doesn't mean that's the base price.

Challenger SRT8 won't run $50,000 msrp.

Feel free to believe it when you see it.
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 07:43 PM
  #54  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Originally Posted by georgejetson
Consider also the ongoing hints from CG that they consider Challenger to be a premium product vs the Mustang and Camaro, presumably because of the larger interior.

As an aside, it will be very interesting to see what they do to the LX rear on the hottest Challengers. The SRT-8s have already had trouble with breakage when using drag radials, much less slicks. Adding 100 hp or whatever won't exactly help.
Originally Posted by guionM
Chrysler is taking no prisoners with the SRT Challenger. While GM is setting the Camaro's up claim to fame to be a racing circuit car, the Challenger is going to be a drag racer.

This is pure speculation on my part, but taking what I know about the current SRT team ..... I'd say the Challenger is likely to be quicker than whatever Camaro GM brings to the party, while Camaro is going etch out Challenger and especially Mustang on race courses such as Nurbring and Laguna Seca.
Well, if the Challenger really is slated to be a "premium" product, w/larger interior, and if it comes even close in final production to its concept, then I still believe it's going to be a tank . And if it's true that the current Charger SRT-8's are having "issues" breaking things with sticky tires on (this is the first I've heard of that ) ..... wellllllllll, I still have my doubts about it edging out anything .

Originally Posted by guionM
Feel free to believe it when you see it.
I will . So far all I saw was a 425 HP Charger SRT-8 run a 13.8 @ 104 beside me, while I ran a 13.4 @ 107 with my "310 HP" LS1 Z28 . They'd better be doing their homework!!
Old Jan 26, 2007 | 07:51 PM
  #55  
KLee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 370
From: Honolulu, Hi USA
Originally Posted by georgejetson
With all due respect, I'll believe it when I see it.

MSRP on a GT500 with options is already in the mid-$40k range, and the current Charger SRT-8s as generally equipped are getting close to that (the last two I saw were both over $43k MSRP). Where will that be in two or three years? Consider also the ongoing hints from CG that they consider Challenger to be a premium product vs the Mustang and Camaro, presumably because of the larger interior. I bet MSRP on the typical top-performing (whatever they call it) Challenger as equipped by the average dealer will be north of $45k... unless GM chooses to offer a competitive product for significantly less. That's the big variable.

As an aside, it will be very interesting to see what they do to the LX rear on the hottest Challengers. The SRT-8s have already had trouble with breakage when using drag radials, much less slicks. Adding 100 hp or whatever won't exactly help.
There are four different SRT8 Chargers at two stealerships in Honolulu ranging from 36800-39500. I bought my Magnum SRT8 for 36. I doubt the Challenger SRT8 will be 50K unless the dealer adds some incredible markup and some dumb fool is willing to pay it.
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 03:27 PM
  #56  
5thgen69camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,802
From: Annapolis MD
Originally Posted by guionM
V10 is FAR from dead. Viper=V10 just like Corvette=V8.
Forget about it going into a Challenger. It's essentially a hand made engine, and I don't see anyone dishing out 60-80K for a Challenger, just like I don't see anyone doing it for a Camaro, Mustang, or GTO.
Yeah but that would be a cool limited edition ZL1 type image booster.
Old Jan 29, 2007 | 01:04 PM
  #57  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by KLee
There are four different SRT8 Chargers at two stealerships in Honolulu ranging from 36800-39500. I bought my Magnum SRT8 for 36...
Sounds like Hono's dealerships aren't stealing as much as they were when I was living there. I remember mid 90s Impala SSs going for 30K (the police got them at a slight discount, then most of that was subsidized by the state!). Mustangs carried a $3K markup.

If they are selling SRT Chargers for 36-39K, they're at least on par with California.
Old Jan 29, 2007 | 08:08 PM
  #58  
305fan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,308
From: Calgary
Originally Posted by guionM
Sounds like Hono's dealerships aren't stealing as much as they were when I was living there. I remember mid 90s Impala SSs going for 30K (the police got them at a slight discount, then most of that was subsidized by the state!). Mustangs carried a $3K markup.

If they are selling SRT Chargers for 36-39K, they're at least on par with California.
don't be so sure---I was just there and some prices I saw were criminal!!
Old Jan 31, 2007 | 04:21 AM
  #59  
KLee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 370
From: Honolulu, Hi USA
Originally Posted by 305fan
don't be so sure---I was just there and some prices I saw were criminal!!

Everytime I go in for servicing, Cutter is offering SRTs at employee cost less rebates. They tried to get my wife to agree to an SRT10 QC Niterunner.
Old Jan 31, 2007 | 06:44 AM
  #60  
305fan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,308
From: Calgary
Originally Posted by KLee
Everytime I go in for servicing, Cutter is offering SRTs at employee cost less rebates. They tried to get my wife to agree to an SRT10 QC Niterunner.
well I am of course speaking of what I saw--was in Kaliau at the Ford dealer and the Pontiac dealer on the Nimitz.

I heard of Cutter--saw some commericals, pretty funny stuff. I also watched that car show made in Hawaii



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 AM.