SRT-8's to get 6.4L? 500 hp?
Well, you make a good point. However, in a Hotrod Magazine (or some similar publication), they compared a 6.1L Hemi (found in current SRT8s) to the early carbed 426 hemi. They made similar power. On the engine dyno the fuel injected 6.1L made either 450 or 455 hp.
So, if they used the SAE rating for today's 6.1L hemi, they might rate it at ~450hp.
That puts the 6.4L @ ~475, now add in small improvements, and ~500 is believable.
Mike
So, if they used the SAE rating for today's 6.1L hemi, they might rate it at ~450hp.
That puts the 6.4L @ ~475, now add in small improvements, and ~500 is believable.
Mike
Alos it makes the 427 LS7 sound like its not really putting out--if it can only do 505 with 0.6L more displacement.
. That's what makes it 500 "streetable" HP
. There are lots of smaller displacement engines making well over 500 HP, but no OEM could put one in a car, warranty it, and expect (average) people to enjoy driving them everyday
. And their fuel economy would probably suck too.
Forget about it going into a Challenger. It's essentially a hand made engine, and I don't see anyone dishing out 60-80K for a Challenger, just like I don't see anyone doing it for a Camaro, Mustang, or GTO.
well that is if LSx motors are suddenly OHC multivalve VVT engines.Theres nothing to study on an LSx motor, it's not some sort of revolutionary powerplant producing ungodly amounts of specific output on tree hugger friendly teddybear farts. The LSx motors are very refined OHV engines that prove without a doubt there is no replacement for displacement.

It's funny when you read posts about how Ford is studying or Chrysler took ideas from GM's LSx engines as if it's some "wunder-motor". Please!

GM, Ford, and Chrysler all have been making motors for roughly 100 years, and all 3 have top notch engineers working on their programs. The only difference is priorities. Ford's priority is on forged internals & overhead cams. GM's is on fuel economy and cost to manufacture. Chrysler's is cost to manufacture and performance. Change the priorities around between the manufacturers, and you get very different engines.
I'm more than certain that when the Boss motors come out, they will be OHC engines, probably in a 2 (maybe 3) and 4 valve layout with VVT. The big distinction between the MOD motor and the Boss motor being one of displacment with Ford probably going to oversquare and/or square bore/stroke ratio. Hell if all the Boss motors turned out to be were mod motors with a bigger bore/bore spacing and increased displacement that'd make a big difference in HP/TQ alone.
You're very close to being accurate.

I wonder if they'll be successful with their goals?
(sub-4000lbs, and GT500 killer). If so, then we "may" have something to worry about in the Camaro camp
.
BUT, has the weight "goal" of the Camaro not been to stay "close" to the former ~3500 lbs model?
(realistic #'s of ~3600 - 3700 lbs??). And I have faith in the LSx engines as far as power is concerned.
Well, I guess we wait and see what the Dodge boys come up with?
(sub-4000lbs, and GT500 killer). If so, then we "may" have something to worry about in the Camaro camp
.BUT, has the weight "goal" of the Camaro not been to stay "close" to the former ~3500 lbs model?
(realistic #'s of ~3600 - 3700 lbs??). And I have faith in the LSx engines as far as power is concerned.Well, I guess we wait and see what the Dodge boys come up with?

This is pure speculation on my part, but taking what I know about the current SRT team at Chrysler, Chrysler's management's willingness to fully fund what they need, and the fact that unlike SVT (which has effectively been dissolved) and GMHP division (which is more generic and constrained), I'd say the Challenger is likely to be quicker than whatever Camaro GM brings to the party, while Camaro is going etch out Challenger and especially Mustang on race courses such as Nurbring and Laguna Seca.
With all due respect, I'll believe it when I see it.
MSRP on a GT500 with options is already in the mid-$40k range, and the current Charger SRT-8s as generally equipped are getting close to that (the last two I saw were both over $43k MSRP). Where will that be in two or three years? Consider also the ongoing hints from CG that they consider Challenger to be a premium product vs the Mustang and Camaro, presumably because of the larger interior. I bet MSRP on the typical top-performing (whatever they call it) Challenger as equipped by the average dealer will be north of $45k... unless GM chooses to offer a competitive product for significantly less. That's the big variable.
As an aside, it will be very interesting to see what they do to the LX rear on the hottest Challengers. The SRT-8s have already had trouble with breakage when using drag radials, much less slicks. Adding 100 hp or whatever won't exactly help.
MSRP on a GT500 with options is already in the mid-$40k range, and the current Charger SRT-8s as generally equipped are getting close to that (the last two I saw were both over $43k MSRP). Where will that be in two or three years? Consider also the ongoing hints from CG that they consider Challenger to be a premium product vs the Mustang and Camaro, presumably because of the larger interior. I bet MSRP on the typical top-performing (whatever they call it) Challenger as equipped by the average dealer will be north of $45k... unless GM chooses to offer a competitive product for significantly less. That's the big variable.
As an aside, it will be very interesting to see what they do to the LX rear on the hottest Challengers. The SRT-8s have already had trouble with breakage when using drag radials, much less slicks. Adding 100 hp or whatever won't exactly help.
I cannot say for the regular production mustang, but to handily beat the Boy and Man racers is saying alot. The cars were set up so well that the common perception is the boy racer had a horsepower advantage over the competition, in truth the boy racer had a very good chassis and was quicker than alot of cars (BMW & Porsche) through the turns allowing the mustangs to get through faster creating the illusion that they were just one trick ponies with alot of top end. Hopefully I can find a link to the post where this is discussed. The info is on a ferrarri forum and the guy who posted the information was one of the people who helped to set-up/campaign the boy racers. In a nutshell, the boy racers had some serious development resulting in a very sorted out chassis, despite being heavy and some issues with the rear brakes (stock size rear discs with a funky booster curve resulted in brakes that were cooked pretty fast). As for the HP advantage, the boy racers had comparable hp/wgt ratios to the competition.
$38,095 for the SRT Charger.
Whatever options you pile on or whatever dealers pile on top is irrelevent. There's a Tahoe nearby going for $55K. Doesn't mean that's the base price.
Challenger SRT8 won't run $50,000 msrp.
Feel free to believe it when you see it.
Consider also the ongoing hints from CG that they consider Challenger to be a premium product vs the Mustang and Camaro, presumably because of the larger interior.
As an aside, it will be very interesting to see what they do to the LX rear on the hottest Challengers. The SRT-8s have already had trouble with breakage when using drag radials, much less slicks. Adding 100 hp or whatever won't exactly help.
As an aside, it will be very interesting to see what they do to the LX rear on the hottest Challengers. The SRT-8s have already had trouble with breakage when using drag radials, much less slicks. Adding 100 hp or whatever won't exactly help.
Chrysler is taking no prisoners with the SRT Challenger. While GM is setting the Camaro's up claim to fame to be a racing circuit car, the Challenger is going to be a drag racer.
This is pure speculation on my part, but taking what I know about the current SRT team ..... I'd say the Challenger is likely to be quicker than whatever Camaro GM brings to the party, while Camaro is going etch out Challenger and especially Mustang on race courses such as Nurbring and Laguna Seca.
This is pure speculation on my part, but taking what I know about the current SRT team ..... I'd say the Challenger is likely to be quicker than whatever Camaro GM brings to the party, while Camaro is going etch out Challenger and especially Mustang on race courses such as Nurbring and Laguna Seca.
. And if it's true that the current Charger SRT-8's are having "issues" breaking things with sticky tires on (this is the first I've heard of that
) ..... wellllllllll, I still have my doubts about it edging out anything
.I will
. So far all I saw was a 425 HP Charger SRT-8 run a 13.8 @ 104 beside me, while I ran a 13.4 @ 107 with my "310 HP" LS1 Z28
. They'd better be doing their homework!!
With all due respect, I'll believe it when I see it.
MSRP on a GT500 with options is already in the mid-$40k range, and the current Charger SRT-8s as generally equipped are getting close to that (the last two I saw were both over $43k MSRP). Where will that be in two or three years? Consider also the ongoing hints from CG that they consider Challenger to be a premium product vs the Mustang and Camaro, presumably because of the larger interior. I bet MSRP on the typical top-performing (whatever they call it) Challenger as equipped by the average dealer will be north of $45k... unless GM chooses to offer a competitive product for significantly less. That's the big variable.
As an aside, it will be very interesting to see what they do to the LX rear on the hottest Challengers. The SRT-8s have already had trouble with breakage when using drag radials, much less slicks. Adding 100 hp or whatever won't exactly help.
MSRP on a GT500 with options is already in the mid-$40k range, and the current Charger SRT-8s as generally equipped are getting close to that (the last two I saw were both over $43k MSRP). Where will that be in two or three years? Consider also the ongoing hints from CG that they consider Challenger to be a premium product vs the Mustang and Camaro, presumably because of the larger interior. I bet MSRP on the typical top-performing (whatever they call it) Challenger as equipped by the average dealer will be north of $45k... unless GM chooses to offer a competitive product for significantly less. That's the big variable.
As an aside, it will be very interesting to see what they do to the LX rear on the hottest Challengers. The SRT-8s have already had trouble with breakage when using drag radials, much less slicks. Adding 100 hp or whatever won't exactly help.
If they are selling SRT Chargers for 36-39K, they're at least on par with California.
Sounds like Hono's dealerships aren't stealing as much as they were when I was living there. I remember mid 90s Impala SSs going for 30K (the police got them at a slight discount, then most of that was subsidized by the state!). Mustangs carried a $3K markup.
If they are selling SRT Chargers for 36-39K, they're at least on par with California.
If they are selling SRT Chargers for 36-39K, they're at least on par with California.

I heard of Cutter--saw some commericals, pretty funny stuff. I also watched that car show made in Hawaii


