View Poll Results: Does Chevy need to rethink it's SS sub-brand?
No way, everyone thinks it's awesome.



26
54.17%
Time for a more relevant performance marketing strategy.



22
45.83%
Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll
Spinoff: Is it time for Chevy to replace it's SS sub-brand?
Where's the option for "keep the SS name but change how you market it"?
I love what SS is supposed to stand for, but they ruined it with lackluster cars wearing that badge a while back and they need to do some damage control. For the most part they've stopped putting the badge on lackluster cars, but they haven't drawn enough attention to that fact.
I love what SS is supposed to stand for, but they ruined it with lackluster cars wearing that badge a while back and they need to do some damage control. For the most part they've stopped putting the badge on lackluster cars, but they haven't drawn enough attention to that fact.
I think GM needs an in house performance division much like GMPD but under a different name. one reason because 'GM' isnt the best resonating brand name to people and even more simply because 4 syllables is too long. 3 syllables max. SVT, SRT, TRD, and AMG all have 3. Its easy to say and thus will resonate people. when you say one of those brands people know exactly what youre talking about and what they would be getting. Theyre badged on on the cars so people know what it is. I dont recal if GMPD was ever really badged on any of their cars except maybe in the engine bay.
I'd say you could use SS like how Audi does the RS models but i feel like SS was watered down for so long it doesnt cary the same resonance. It also doesnt help that the top performance car doesnt have the SS trim.
I'd say you could use SS like how Audi does the RS models but i feel like SS was watered down for so long it doesnt cary the same resonance. It also doesnt help that the top performance car doesnt have the SS trim.
I just wanted to ask you Doug, since I respect your opinion on the subject, do you think there's anything that can be done to a 5th gen to create a "real Z/28" out of it? Frankly, I have my doubts.
Let me preface this by saying that I'm certainly no artist, but I know that gold clashes with a lot of colors. Particularly silver or grey, which seems to be the colors that GM loves to use on the cars in their ads.
I'm sure part of the switch to the gold bowtie from the blue was that somewhere in the bowels of GM, somebody decided that blue had too strong of a connection to the blue oval of ford.
As for SS, maybe in the next couple of years, once we get some distance between the "bad" SS cars, we'll all have a different outlook of the brand?
I'm sure part of the switch to the gold bowtie from the blue was that somewhere in the bowels of GM, somebody decided that blue had too strong of a connection to the blue oval of ford.
As for SS, maybe in the next couple of years, once we get some distance between the "bad" SS cars, we'll all have a different outlook of the brand?
Last edited by Sixer-Bird; Sep 15, 2009 at 10:36 AM.
I guess my point might be that the "bad" SS cars weren't necessarily really bad. They were what they were and served a marketing purpose. Their image legacy however is somewhat muddled and unfocused.
Last edited by Z284ever; Sep 15, 2009 at 01:04 PM.
Experimental car circa 1957.
http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/z...rvette-SS.aspx
http://www.conceptcarz.com/view/phot...-SS_photo.aspx
http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/z...rvette-SS.aspx
http://www.conceptcarz.com/view/phot...-SS_photo.aspx
I think they need to move in a new direction but that doesn't mean getting rid of SS necessarily. They should keep it on cars where there is a strong traditional association like the Camaro or Impala. Even though the Cobalt SS (especially the turbo model) was very good it just doesn't seem like SS is a good moniker for something that isn't really in a "muscle car" segment. Just as it would be ridiculous to make a Corvette SS (yes I realize the first SS was a Corvette but it was a racecar and is not well known).
I don't really think you need to have a unified performance moniker although it would be nice. I don't think that SS can become the Chevrolet M or AMG or SVT though. The Z designations would probably be better for that.
I don't really think you need to have a unified performance moniker although it would be nice. I don't think that SS can become the Chevrolet M or AMG or SVT though. The Z designations would probably be better for that.
Some models have SS as their top "sports" model and some have LTZ.
To address the Z thing, LTZ isn't it. I am talking about ZL1, ZR1, Z06, Z28, etc. Maybe you could make Z series into the M of Chevrolet.
As to whether or not they are doing that now, there is not a dedicated performance group that is improving any of the cars since GMPD was dissolved. I wonder how many engineers it would really take to make a little version of the Skunk Works that just refines existing models? How many people are at SVT or AMG?
Yes and no.
To address the Z thing, LTZ isn't it. I am talking about ZL1, ZR1, Z06, Z28, etc. Maybe you could make Z series into the M of Chevrolet.
As to whether or not they are doing that now, there is not a dedicated performance group that is improving any of the cars since GMPD was dissolved. I wonder how many engineers it would really take to make a little version of the Skunk Works that just refines existing models? How many people are at SVT or AMG?
To address the Z thing, LTZ isn't it. I am talking about ZL1, ZR1, Z06, Z28, etc. Maybe you could make Z series into the M of Chevrolet.
As to whether or not they are doing that now, there is not a dedicated performance group that is improving any of the cars since GMPD was dissolved. I wonder how many engineers it would really take to make a little version of the Skunk Works that just refines existing models? How many people are at SVT or AMG?
First of all, the need to retune the suspension/steering for better feedback, especially on center. Target on the retune is to beat Mustang GT w/ Track Pack, and I'd aim even higher: BMW M3. All Camaros, even V6s, should get this change. The remaining items here are what I think should make up the Z28 option package:
- Upgrade tires to Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 (arguably the best street performance tire in existence), maybe increasing the width. I'm thinking 265 front, 295 rear.
- Reduce wheel size to 19", or even 18" if the Brembos will still fit.
- Upgrade the suspension with some firmer bushings, revised spring and damper rates, etc. Drop the ride height a touch (this should help offset the appearance problem created by the smaller wheels).
- Don't mess with the brakes, except maybe a pad upgrade.
- Seats with better bolstering. Something from Recaro/Sparco/etc would be good.
- Some fancy low-weight materials wherever appropriate -- maybe a magnesium engine cradle, for example
- Z06/ZR1-style mufflers w/ vacuum-activated bypass.
- Maybe some basic factory performance upgrades -- CAI, exhaust, maybe even a GMPP "hotcam" for enhanced performance without adding weight. SAE certified horsepower should be at least 450 with the upgrades, 475 would be the number I'd aim for.
- Revised gear ratios, either in the TR6060 or the rear end, for better acceleration.
- For visual distinction, lose the "mail slot" and add the hood from Transformers 2.
How would you feel about calling that a Z28?
Finally, if GM were to build such a car, what would you then suggest that they call the supercharged beast that is currently on hold?
I have to correct people all the time and tell them "Its not a Cobra, its a Shelby, Ford hasn't made a Cobra since 2004".
As far as the supercharged beast, I could care less what they call it.
)
took the words right out of my mouth. ZL1 or COPO. ZL1 would mesh with the counterpart Vette ZR1. It fits the Z cars like Z28 Ive heard all the arguements against. COPO is a Central Office Production Order not a car. ZL1 is a specific aluminum 427 Big block. It was a model no different in my mind than the Z/28 with the DZ, it just never had a name which was intentional.
Last edited by 5thgen69camaro; Sep 16, 2009 at 12:28 AM.


