Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Silverado sales crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 03:35 AM
  #16  
kizz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 564
From: Fletcher, NC, US
Speaking of the Avalanche, that could be a major factor in any Silverado slowdowns. I'm sure Avalanche sales have just recetly peaked though I have no numbers to prove it.

And yes the new and clad-free Avalanche variant looks absolutely horrible. The original design is the winner.

GT
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 05:24 AM
  #17  
30thZ286speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,030
From: Frankfort, KY U.S.A.
On the regular truck the new look to me doesn't match to the rest of the truck very well. It looks good on the SS and the HD trucks but they should have retained the bulge hoods on the HD trucks.
GMCs look much better to me. If I were in the market for a truck I'd get a GMC.
I thought Chevys truck sales were closing in on Fords. In reality Chevy sells more trucks to the public than Ford, because Ford sells a ton of fleet trucks to business, etc. each year.
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 05:29 AM
  #18  
30thZ286speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,030
From: Frankfort, KY U.S.A.
Also, the new truck look, works good on the new upcoming Colorado.
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 05:37 AM
  #19  
guess who's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 562
From: Mich.
Avalanche isnt selling worth a poop either.
3529 this Jan to 6634 last Jan.
Seems like that FAD is on a decline.
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 06:41 AM
  #20  
SNEAKY NEIL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,072
From: Lilburn, GA, USA
You can't compare sales of one month to another month a year ago..................Comparing 1 year to another is much more accurate for gauging sales.
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 06:45 AM
  #21  
Mervz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 240
From: Weare, NH
Originally posted by SNEAKY NEIL
You can't compare sales of one month to another month a year ago..................Comparing 1 year to another is much more accurate for gauging sales.
Exactly. But then again, most of the people here obviously don't know a thing about buisness. They just want to rip GM as much as they can.
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 06:51 AM
  #22  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
They need to start making great cars to get people more interested and back into them. Enough with these SUV's already.
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 07:04 AM
  #23  
RiceEating5.0's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,313
I'm not a fan of the escalade/avalanch like front end treatment. Nor am i a fan of the edgy lines of the CTS. They took a truck that was easily the best looking in it's class and messed it up (my opinion). The new Ram has grown on me and i actually like it now, so maybe the new GM's will as well.
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 07:41 AM
  #24  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Re: Re: Silverado sales crash

Originally posted by Z284ever


If there is one silver lining here...it's that John Cafaro is now designing trucks...and will leave our "new" Camaro unmolested.
If people said that back when Cafaro was working on the C5 Corvette... we might not even have a Corvette right now.

Something to think about.
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 11:49 AM
  #25  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
THe 2003 Silverado front looks great from the front, but not from the profile. Since the head lights don't wrap around as much it makes the Silverado look like it has too much overhang on the front. If I was going to get a '03 Silverado I would make sure it had the fender flares, they look much better with those.
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 12:09 PM
  #26  
Meccadeth's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,472
From: South Bend, Indiana
I would think that sales SHOULD be up Jan. 2003 vrs. Jan. 2002. America was still in shock over 9/11 last January. Even though sales from one month, exactly a year in between aren't always ACCURATE, I think its good to use it as a tool. This COULD be a sign that the new body style isn't catching on to the public yet (Even though I love it). Since other trucks/SUVs seem to be selling at the same pace, it can't be a gas crisis. Someone should do some referencing as to see how some other trucks sold a few months after a major make-over.
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 03:15 PM
  #27  
guess who's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 562
From: Mich.
Originally posted by Mervz
Exactly. But then again, most of the people here obviously don't know a thing about buisness. They just want to rip GM as much as they can.
I used it as a comparison..I know about the buisness well enough.Hell I work in the buisness myself.
Speaking of ripping GM,Look at how the T-bird is selling.500 down from last year and it is a BIG deal,Vette is down 1000.Does it matter?Heck no it doesnt it is winter for heavens sake this is "normal"But going off of how vehicles have been selling for the last 10 years or so it isnt considered normal.l.Yeah using month to month sales figures is kind of a pissing match but either way it is how the INDUSTRY tells if they are up or down.So to be exact GM is down.It isnt making headlines is it?No.Is a niche car like the Tbird?Yes.

Either way I see your words are well respected on this forum,Im not trying to degrade you in anyway,So with that I wish you- good day
Old Feb 6, 2003 | 04:43 PM
  #28  
Richard Cabeza's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 59
Well I had an 02 2500 with a 366 a year ago, it was a knocking pos so I got rid of it as fast as you would get rid of a moped in front of your friends. Hopefully with sales dropping GM will actually get off thier asses and fix thier lemons instead of claiming "it's normal" I'm sure the ugly noses aren't helping either.
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 12:07 AM
  #29  
Fbodfather's Avatar
ALMIGHTY MEMBER
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,298
From: Detroit, MI USA
Go look at December's numbers first. Very heavy year-end incentives......when those incentives come off (and there were regional incentives on trucks based on state you live in) the next month will normally be off.

You can't judge a vehicle's success on a 30 day sales report.

As I recall, when we brought the new Silverado out, most hated it too, as the 'old' CK truck was familiar........kinda like your favorite pair of blue jeans..........
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 11:09 AM
  #30  
RiceEating5.0's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,313
Overall GM sales were down 2.5% compared to January of 2002. That had allot to do with truck, Suv, and van sales slipping 19%. But car sales increased by 23% compared to last January of 2002.

http://www.detnews.com/2003/autosins...utos-75969.htm



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40 AM.