Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

A Sea of Unwanted Imports

Old 11-21-2008, 10:24 AM
  #46  
Registered User
 
Silverado C-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,897
I'll be 28 soon and never owned a brand new car. The newest vehicle I've ever owned was my 00 Z71 I bought in '05 with 66K on it.

I will most likely never buy a brand new vehicle. I have less money in my Z71, S-10, and 67's restoration (did it myself) COMBINED than what my Z71 would have cost brand new back in 2000.

My wife's brand new tacoma (in 05) was a college graduation present from her parents. I want to "unload" the tacoma, but my wife won't let me (will **** parents off). Damn thing never gets driven, it's 3.5 years old and has 8,400 miles on it.

Last edited by Silverado C-10; 11-21-2008 at 10:29 AM.
Silverado C-10 is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 10:41 AM
  #47  
Banned
 
Robert_Nashville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,943
Originally Posted by Silverado C-10
I'll be 28 soon and never owned a brand new car...
This is not meant as a swipe at you Silverado so please don't take it personally - in fact, you are doing the right thing financially by buying "used".

That said, it does surprise me a bit at how many here are so pro-GM and so want GM to survive and so want the Federal government to step in and prop them up yet they don't buy NEW GM vehicles.

Buying used GM vehicles does help the overall economy (as buying "anything" does) and it does tend to keep used vehicle values "up" which does translate into a (mostly psychological) "bump" when people are considering buying new but let's be honest with ourselves; a person who buys a used GM vehicle isn't really helping GM!

So for all who are so adamant about saving GM, I'd say that if you haven't bought a brand new GM vehicle within the past 8-12 months then you too are part of the problem (and being at least a bit hypocritical in pushing for a taxpayer bailout).

Just my $0.02
Robert_Nashville is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 10:46 AM
  #48  
Registered User
 
Silverado C-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,897
^Nope, you're 100% within' the right to say that. I've felt that at times myself. I'm more of a classic car guy anyway. I had considered a Camaro (2010) as my first new vehicle ever until I saw the price tag. I can't say I won't ever buy brand new, my wife is a vet and I'm an engineer, but I can't ever seem to justify the depreciation in my head. My 67 was my first vehicle I ever owned and drove legally on the road. There's something about rolling in a classic GM vehicle that appeals to me. I want GM to survive so that I can have lots of reliable used GM cars/trucks in my future. It's selfish of me to want others to pay for the depreciation, but the a*hole in me doesn't care

HOWEVER, GM HAS gotten a good bit of money from me because I only buy GM parts when I fix my newer stuff (either GM dealer or GMpartsdirect.com (which really is just a GM dealer with good prices)). I plan on a $1,500 GM crate engine for my 67 next year. Unfortunately, there isn't a lot of stuff "left" for my '67 but I was able to get about $500 of stuff from GM's restoration catalog (basically unsold NOS stuff) and the aftermarket companies that sell the GM restoration parts have to pay royalties to GM.

Last edited by Silverado C-10; 11-21-2008 at 10:53 AM.
Silverado C-10 is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 11:13 AM
  #49  
Registered User
 
Purple 92 SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 506
Originally Posted by Robert_Nashville

That said, it does surprise me a bit at how many here are so pro-GM and so want GM to survive and so want the Federal government to step in and prop them up yet they don't buy NEW GM vehicles.


I see your point, but the flip of that is perhaps folks WANT to buy a new GM but cannot afford the vehicle they want. If you want a corvette, would you settle for an aveo? perhaps these same people WANT gm to survive, so that when they have the money saved up, they can buy that new corvette they've lusted after forever.

Yes, i used extremes in my example, but im sure you understand my point.
Purple 92 SS is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 11:20 AM
  #50  
Banned
 
shock6906's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sandy VJJville
Posts: 3,584
Originally Posted by Northwest94Z
Absolutely not. The southwest coast by comparison to the east coast is very dry and arid. Just what cars like for longevity. There is also no salt being dumped on the roads on the west cost (south).

We don't get any salt on the roads in my area.
shock6906 is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 11:21 AM
  #51  
Banned
 
Robert_Nashville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,943
Originally Posted by Purple 92 SS
I see your point, but the flip of that is perhaps folks WANT to buy a new GM but cannot afford the vehicle they want. If you want a corvette, would you settle for an aveo? perhaps these same people WANT gm to survive, so that when they have the money saved up, they can buy that new corvette they've lusted after forever.

Yes, i used extremes in my example, but im sure you understand my point.
Yes...I get your point.

I could list about 20 cars of the top of my head that all, unfortunately, cost many times more than my annual salary (hell, some of them cost more than my lifetime of annual salaries combined) so I've always had to settle.

I think a lot of our economy's problem is that a lot of people should have settled for the Aveo but bougth the 'Vette anyay - that may have been good for GM in the short term but bad for themselves personally, the country generally and ultimately bad for GM as well!
Robert_Nashville is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 11:21 AM
  #52  
Registered User
 
Northwest94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Mill Creek, WA
Posts: 511
Originally Posted by shock6906
We don't get any salt on the roads in my area.
But you do have humidity? When I lived in North Carolina and Virginia I remember humid summers.
Northwest94Z is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 12:14 PM
  #53  
Registered User
 
Darth Xed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,504
Originally Posted by Robert_Nashville
Is your point that if foreign governments step in and help their domestic auto industries; that makes it appropriate; perhaps even necessary for the U.S. Federal government to step in and help it's (original) domestic auto industry even if such help violates the Constitution as well as the free market system the country was founded on?

If that is your point, then I would assume that in your child labor example, it would be appropriate for the U.S. to go back to allowing child labor in it's domestic T-shirt industry because that's what the governments of other countries allow?

No, the point is that if I felt child labor was inappropriate, and I go on an on (and on.... and on..... an on...) about how inappropriate it is.... I probably shouldn't be working for a company whole utilizes child labor.

It would kinda make anything I said hypocritical.
Darth Xed is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 12:34 PM
  #54  
Banned
 
Robert_Nashville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,943
Originally Posted by Darth Xed
No, the point is that if I felt child labor was inappropriate, and I go on an on (and on.... and on..... an on...) about how inappropriate it is.... I probably shouldn't be working for a company whole utilizes child labor.

It would kinda make anything I said hypocritical.
Well, analogies aside, I don't happen to think that a socialistic government doing socialistic things is inappropriate (nor should it be a surprise to anyone)...I do think it's inappropriate (not to mention illegal) for a representative democracy which purports to honor the virtues of the free enterprise system to step in and start acting like a socialistic government.

If you want to talk about hypocrisy, what's more hypocritical than those who claim to be supportive of the free-enterprise system but clamor for the Federal government to step in with billions of dollars it doesn't have all to save their favorite company from its many decades of bad business decisions.

The current credit crunch and recession may be the straw that broke the proverbial camel's back but the entire barn filled with straw fell on top of the camel a long time ago.

Last edited by Robert_Nashville; 11-21-2008 at 12:48 PM.
Robert_Nashville is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 12:58 PM
  #55  
Registered User
 
Geoff Chadwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: All around
Posts: 2,154
Originally Posted by Robert_Nashville
some of them cost more than my lifetime of annual salaries combined
Bugatti Veyron and the new Aston Martin. Oh, and the Bugatti Veyron roadster. Pagani Zonda F. Pagani Zonda Roadster. McLaren F1. XJ220.

Originally Posted by Robert_Nashville
I think a lot of our economy's problem is that a lot of people should have settled for the Aveo but bougth the 'Vette anyay
I cannot imagine how much sticker shock GM is going to go through over this regard. I (buying used and seemingly rather reliable cars) am not supporting GM all that much either - but GM's $40,000 trucks were rediculous and people making $44k a year would get financing for them.


If there are X cars on the road and their lifetime is constantly increasing, the number of sales will decrease. In order to maintain sales of more reliable cars, the number of cars on the road must constantly increase. If the economy goes in the junk, sales will decrease.

This is like high school economics. How GM intends to keep their volume is beyond me. Making more reliable product is going to reduce sales all on its own.
Geoff Chadwick is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 12:59 PM
  #56  
Registered User
 
SCNGENNFTHGEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 1,581
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by Purple 92 SS
I see your point, but the flip of that is perhaps folks WANT to buy a new GM but cannot afford the vehicle they want. If you want a corvette, would you settle for an aveo? perhaps these same people WANT gm to survive, so that when they have the money saved up, they can buy that new corvette they've lusted after forever.

Yes, i used extremes in my example, but im sure you understand my point.
Exactly. That's me. One day I hope to be able to afford a new vehicle. However IF GM goes under I never will, because I wouldn't even consider another brand! I've also been a recycler most of my life, being that I can fix things myself. GM vehicles have been good to me.
SCNGENNFTHGEN is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
10-31-2016 11:09 AM
bunker
Parts For Sale
2
01-30-2016 08:09 PM
Bxlt1
Drivetrain
8
09-17-2015 08:31 AM
RX Speed Works
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
07-24-2015 02:25 PM
marineengineer
New Member Introduction
3
02-09-2015 03:59 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: A Sea of Unwanted Imports



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 AM.