Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

For release: Jan. 14, 2008, 12:01 a.m. EST...........................................

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 8, 2008 | 08:20 PM
  #16  
stereomandan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,620
From: Saginaw, Michigan
Absolutely love the interior except for one item, the middle plastic area of the steering wheel. Looks rather cheap to me. The rest looks incredible though.

Dan
Old Jan 8, 2008 | 09:04 PM
  #17  
slt's Avatar
slt
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,024
They should have stuck those seats in the ZR1.
Old Jan 8, 2008 | 09:30 PM
  #18  
number77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Originally Posted by ImportedRoomate
Ill take my Camaro with that interior.
Old Jan 8, 2008 | 10:10 PM
  #19  
mdenz3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,173



If only I had money....
Old Jan 8, 2008 | 10:51 PM
  #20  
30thZ286speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,030
From: Frankfort, KY U.S.A.
The GM press release was just pulled, I was on the site clicked off then a few mins. later went back and all info is gone.
Old Jan 8, 2008 | 11:21 PM
  #21  
90 Z28SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,801
From: South Bend , IN
Wow , this car is gonna be sick and they even added all the >>right<< details to the interior .
Old Jan 8, 2008 | 11:23 PM
  #22  
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,650
From: Indianapolis, IN


550 hp!! I knew it was possible, but to see it in writing...

Old Jan 9, 2008 | 12:59 AM
  #23  
dav305z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 757
Originally Posted by ImportedRoomate
Ill take my Camaro with that interior.
If GM puts this engine in a Camaro and sells it anywhere in the $30,000 ball park, I'd take it with crates for seats.
Old Jan 9, 2008 | 05:34 AM
  #24  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by tireburnin
I said it in the other forum. Terrible piston choice. I think they will be a limiting factor in power.
Hmmm, I almost thought it was a typo when I first read that. Hypereutectic pistons are what the LS7 has... and we all know that its probably a wise choice not to go the power adder route with those pistons.

I wonder how much more the engine is capable of handling, STOCK?
Old Jan 9, 2008 | 06:54 AM
  #25  
CalicoJack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 125
From: Port Royal, JM
I seriously hope that the peak torque rpm is a typo, otherwise the curve better be a flat as Kate Moss.
Old Jan 9, 2008 | 07:14 AM
  #26  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
Yeah but the gears are pretty short in the Corvette with it's rear ratios. In the CTS 1st gear will only be good till like 10mph and will be useless at WOT with 3.73s. And although the auto Vettes are 30% lighter, they are down 120HP.
Where in the heck are you getting those speeds?

According to my calculations (which are approximate because I had to guess at the tire size and redline), first gear will be good to about 30mph in the automatic version and about 50mph with the manual trans.

Regarding it being useless at WOT... did you not read about Performance Traction Management?
Old Jan 9, 2008 | 10:05 AM
  #27  
Zigroid's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 948
From: Stroudsburg, PA
Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
Yeah but the gears are pretty short in the Corvette with it's rear ratios. In the CTS 1st gear will only be good till like 10mph and will be useless at WOT with 3.73s. And although the auto Vettes are 30% lighter, they are down 120HP.
using a gear ratio calculator and a 6500 rpm red line:
1st is good for 35
2nd 59 (boo, 2 gear changes for 0-60)
3rd 91
4th 121 (should trap really close to the top of 4th gear)
5th 164
6th 208

and with the manual:
1st 52
2nd 78
3rd 107
4th 139
5th 174
6th 221
Old Jan 9, 2008 | 10:19 AM
  #28  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by Zigroid
using a gear ratio calculator and a 6500 rpm red line:
What tire size did you use?
Old Jan 9, 2008 | 10:28 AM
  #29  
Flip94ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 610
From: Akron, OH.
So the engine lineup is 260hp, 304hp and 550hp? Seems like a place in the middle needs to be filled.

I have been thinking for awhile that GM needs a HO 5.3L. Something in the 360-375 range with DI and DOD. For use in Camaro, G8, CTS, H3A, and C6. I think the vette could knock down 30 mpg in a base model with a engine like this. I dont know that the engine size and DOD would work well with the heavier vehicles unless some favorful gears are used. Which could make for better acceleration numbers.

The caddy is sweet. I bet the piston choice came to NVH. Nobody pays big cash for a car with piston slap. Overall when you think about it, its a bigger motor that the than the 5.7 that most of us run, with excellent heads, and an intercooler and an effficient 4 lobe blower. With heads that good and a cooled charge and lots of cubes cylinder pressures are going not going to be that bad. Add in piston squirters and not all cast pistons are the same, I bet the metal composition is a little better that the cast piston that are running in everthing else.
Old Jan 9, 2008 | 11:04 AM
  #30  
Zigroid's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 948
From: Stroudsburg, PA
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
What tire size did you use?
Tires:
255/40R19 Michelin PS2; summer Z-rated (front)
285/35R19 Michelin PS2; summer Z-rated (rear)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 AM.