Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Ready to get REALLY pissed off?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2003 | 03:57 PM
  #16  
92RS shearn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 470
From: Wichita, KS
Re: Ready to get REALLY pissed off?

Originally posted by PacerX


It looks like Bengal, Sky and Solstice are all a real "go", they now have GM program numbers and launch dates.
What is the date of the solstice launch? Or have they not released the actual date to the public?
Old Jan 20, 2003 | 04:27 PM
  #17  
danno02SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 420
From: Pasadena,CA,USA
Anyone got any termites??
Old Jan 20, 2003 | 09:16 PM
  #18  
0toinsanein5.4sec's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,381
Actually the SSR has already practicaly sold out...I dont think GM messed up too badly this time (for a change)
Old Jan 20, 2003 | 09:33 PM
  #19  
cmc's Avatar
cmc
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 681
From: Houston, TX USA
The fact that the SSR is selling well has no bearing on the fact that they are largely ignoring their performance consumers.
Old Jan 20, 2003 | 10:32 PM
  #20  
Meccadeth's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,472
From: South Bend, Indiana
Originally posted by JEDCamino
Just imagine a PT Cruiser with the back side windows replaced with sheet metal. Then imagine it being a little larger, with a front end reminiscant of a '53 Chevy Truck. I
Oh, so you mean if I took a crap in a toilet, imagined wheels under it and gave it windows, thats what it would look like?
Old Jan 21, 2003 | 12:00 AM
  #21  
Pentatonic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 805
From: MI
Originally posted by Meccadeth
Oh, so you mean if I took a crap in a toilet, imagined wheels under it and gave it windows, thats what it would look like?
Essentially, yes.

It's almost like GM is intentionally trying to produce ugly cars.

Oh, BTW, basing a Camaro off of that little solstice platform would make me more angry than anything else.
Old Jan 21, 2003 | 06:29 AM
  #22  
MunchE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 599
From: Inland Empire, CA
Originally posted by Pentatonic
Essentially, yes.

It's almost like GM is intentionally trying to produce ugly cars.

Oh, BTW, basing a Camaro off of that little solstice platform would make me more angry than anything else.
How big is the Solstice, exactly?

Compared to, say, a 4th gen.

How much shorter is it? How much narrower?

Just curious, since it's so small.

I for one would like to see them bring the Camaro back on the B-Body.
Old Jan 21, 2003 | 06:57 AM
  #23  
IZ28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,647
From: At car shows and cruise nights!
And I'd like to see them bring the Camaro back and the B-Body.
Old Jan 21, 2003 | 07:20 AM
  #24  
cmc's Avatar
cmc
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 681
From: Houston, TX USA
Originally posted by MunchE
I for one would like to see them bring the Camaro back on the B-Body.
You serious?
Old Jan 21, 2003 | 08:13 AM
  #25  
PacerX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
"What is the date of the solstice launch? Or have they not released the actual date to the public?"

It's a model year (MY). I'll dig it out for you, might take a day or so.
Old Jan 21, 2003 | 08:17 AM
  #26  
jrp4uc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,724
From: Hebron, KY
Originally posted by MunchE
How big is the Solstice, exactly?

Compared to, say, a 4th gen.

How much shorter is it? How much narrower?

Just curious, since it's so small.

I for one would like to see them bring the Camaro back on the B-Body.
guionM already broke down the dimensions and just how feasible it is to base a Camaro off of the Solstice platform. There are a lot of misconceptions concerning the Solstice, and having seen it in person I can assure you it is no little rollerskate of a car.
Old Jan 21, 2003 | 08:27 AM
  #27  
stars1010's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,121
From: Houston
Originally posted by jrp4uc
guionM already broke down the dimensions and just how feasible it is to base a Camaro off of the Solstice platform. There are a lot of misconceptions concerning the Solstice, and having seen it in person I can assure you it is no little rollerskate of a car.
This is a little off topic, but what are the interior dimensions of the Solstice? Being tall, (roughly 6'6") the one reason I bought a Camaro was the comfort and leg room I have. Does anyone have a clue if the interior of the coupe version (Bengal) will have comparable room? I could care less about the out side dimensions of the car as long as it looks good and has a V8 under the hood. I want leg room!
Old Jan 21, 2003 | 09:36 AM
  #28  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by MunchE
.

I for one would like to see them bring the Camaro back on the B-Body.
YIKES!!!!!

Why stop there? Base it off the Tahoe.
Old Jan 21, 2003 | 11:24 AM
  #29  
one wicked element's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 842
From: West Michigan
Originally posted by Z284ever
YIKES!!!!!

Why stop there? Base it off the Tahoe.
LOL!
Old Jan 21, 2003 | 02:34 PM
  #30  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Smile

Originally posted by Pentatonic
Essentially, yes.

It's almost like GM is intentionally trying to produce ugly cars.

Oh, BTW, basing a Camaro off of that little solstice platform would make me more angry than anything else.
Why???

Time to shoot down misconceptions of a few people who hasn't actually seen the Solstice with their own eyes, and are following the rest of the herd in thinking it's no bigger than a Miata.

First of all, it is true the Solstice is short. In length, it's about 2" shorter, but that's the only area it matches Miata.

Width:
Solstice- 71"
Camaro- 74.1"
Mustang- 73.1
Miata- 66."

Track (f/r):
Solstice- 60.3/60.5
Camaro- 60.7/60.6
Mustang- 60.2/60.6
Miata- 55.7/56.7

Total overhang:
Solstice- 58"
Camaro- 92"
Mustang- 82
Miata- 67"

A gen 4 Camaro with the same overhang (front & rear combined) as a Solstice would be 6" longer than Solstice, while a Solstice with the massive overhangs of a 4th gen would be only 6" shorter than Camaro.

In short, with not much more than more than a slight extention of wheelbase and a bit more front and rear overhang (which the production Solstice will no doubt have), the Solstice could easily be a Camaro. Finally, GM will be running only 2 sets of rear drive components world-wide, Corvette & Sigma. Solstice will run with one of those.

What it's boiling down to is if you want a lowslung sports Camaro, the Solstice architecture is it. If you want an upright design like the 1st gen or the current Mustang, the new GTO/mid-size sedan VE structure is the choice.

If you think GM is going to make a special structure just for Camaro alone, just keep on waiting.

Last edited by guionM; Jan 21, 2003 at 02:38 PM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 AM.