Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Problem i see in 5th Gen camaro (HP related)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 02:40 PM
  #31  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: Problem i see in 5th Gen camaro (HP related)

Originally Posted by Gold_Rush
Your infatuation with the independent rear and disdain for the the live axle???
One down......


Originally Posted by jrp4uc
I think he's referring to weight and size.
One to go.........
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 02:43 PM
  #32  
PacerX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
Re: Problem i see in 5th Gen camaro (HP related)

This here horse has been beaten to atoms.

GM does not lose horsepower wars.

Next.
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 05:42 PM
  #33  
notgetleft's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 808
From: manassas, VA
Re: Problem i see in 5th Gen camaro (HP related)

Originally Posted by FutureZMan
Multiple engine choices in bore on a Z28 reminds me ALOT of the 3rd Gen, 305 and 350.. I certainly hope we dont travel that road again.
Yeah, god forbid they bring back the last strategy that actually outsold mustang. That'd be crazy....


Originally Posted by FutureZMan
I started doubting GM's competantcy when the pulled the plug on the best camaro they had ever created..
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I'm a die hard chevy guy, and i wouldn't touch a 4th gen with a ten foot pole, no matter what the bang for the buck factor was. Performance does not make something the best ever, it's too easy to make ANYTHING go fast to care what it comes with from the factory. I'd rather drive a turbo civic than a 4th gen.

I only come to this forum in hopes of news that GM isn't going to repeat the 4th gen fiasco again. After all, i'm going to need a convertible in a few years...
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 06:20 PM
  #34  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Re: Problem i see in 5th Gen camaro (HP related)

Originally Posted by FutureZMan
Maybe they where just awful drivers, or maybe 05 mustang is a 15 second car.
Probably awful drivers, considering my 02 GT is good for low 14s to 14 flat with essentially no mods (cheese dick K&N air filter and SLP loudmouth exhaust which amounts to what .0000000000000000000000000000000000001 hp)

Last edited by bossco; Aug 19, 2005 at 08:48 PM.
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 07:29 PM
  #35  
FutureZMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,080
From: Sterling heights, Michigan.
Re: Problem i see in 5th Gen camaro (HP related)

[QUOTE=guionM]What HP are you expecting? Horsepower figures for ALL cars are climbing. That 340 hp or so the 4th gen was making will be made by smaller V8s in a matter of months.[/QUOTE

Honestly a 400 (ish) HP rating, and yes i realize small block output has increased a good amount since 2002.



Originally Posted by guionM
Seems Camaro was doing this perfectly well for 35 years.
Yes i realize this as well, point being is. With other cars having such a high allowance of room in the ways of HP from the companys flagship cars (EX: Viper to a Vette) even if they put the HP to 450, tradition tells us the Camaro will be no more then a SAE rated 400-425. Same can be said for the Cobra Vs GT40. 450HP cobras are a very real threat in the near future especially 2007.



Originally Posted by guionM
If you are even mentioning a Viper in the same breath as a Camaro, you need to take a sedative.
..... It was mentioned as a ceiling for the HP on other dodge products. I was mentioning the Viper as DCX's flagship car. where did you even remotely see a comparison...



Originally Posted by guionM
It's easy. Follow the money:
Ford GT-$130,000
Shelby GT500-$40,000
Mustang GT-$25,000

Not complicated at all.
Yes, but with the Mustang Shelby hitting the 500HP mark (or close to) i dunno if Ford will choose to keep its faithful steed its flagship, and the GT-40 just a dreamers car.





Originally Posted by guionM
Probally that Corvette will go far beyond 400HP in the near future, I'd say.
I would hope so, but with respect to the C5, in a two model year period anything more then a 50HP jump Especially with new SAE ratings seems a little unrealistic. which would theoretically leave the 07' Z28 in the 400 range.


Originally Posted by guionM
GM is going to compete with the Mustang with a low build, Corvette priced car? Riiiight!

Still mentioning Viper and Camaro in the same sentence I see?
heh, say 15 years ago the Impala would comback as a V6 frontwheel drive standard sedan with a spicy V6 model with a Performance V6 pumping out a amazing 230HP carrying the name SS, and hardcore fanatics would say you sir are insane, but GM pulled that one off... did they not?

Point is nothing is impossible with GM at this point.

2#. I wasnt comparing, i was using it as an example..




Originally Posted by guionM
Top performance NEVER was the measure of a "true contender". Remember, the old SN95 Mustang handed the 4th gen Camaro it's a**, despite not being quicker or faster. A true contender is a vehicle that offers a better total package than it's competitor.

BTW: GTs are a little quicker than 15 seconds.
True true, but im looking at it from a performance stand point, not every teenage boy wants one because girls think mustangs are Hot, which was the case in my group of friends, and hell in my general area. The 1995-2004 mustangs sold real well, because they where Eye-catchers, and alot of people where nestalgic. Dont act as if it was a "Better all around package", some things catch the publics eye and some dont.

GTs have done consistant 14's in front of my eyes, just the way it is.





Originally Posted by guionM
stock LT1 will not outaccelerate a 2005 Mustang GT.....period!
where did i ever say my LT1's where stock? with gears and headers pipe and DR's i was putting two lengths on 05's at the track for 13.7-13.4's.

and im pretty sure a Stock 1997 SS would do alot more then Out accelerate a 2005 mustang, unless ofc these new stangs are outperforming there NA Cobra 2000-2002 (??) counterparts...




Originally Posted by guionM
can always tell the younger guys. Their the ones who think Camaros were always the quickest things on the street.

Too bad you missed the 80s.
...or the 70s for that matter.
GM set the bar high with the F4's performance, and setting it lower in todays world would accomplish what? When i think of camaro perfomance i think of 68-71 then 93-02. I have very little experiance with Third Gens . When i was growing up, the standard Z28 was one of the fastiest modern cars on the road, its what ive grown to know and expect.



Originally Posted by guionM
Charger was never a Pony car, unless you are talking about that FWD Omini based car of the early 80s.


Originally Posted by guionM
You have more misconceptions about Camaro's demise than I can count.
I wrote a story on this very subject last year for Popular Hot Rodding. You might want to read it.

Just because a car is quick and can handle doesn't mean it's not a failure. GM (and some people in particular) did everything but perform witchcraft to keep the F-bodies going.

The only real story about GM killing the Camaro & Firebird is that they managed to keep it around till 2002!
I know all to well these storys, my grandfather was an engineer in the drivetrain department in GM from 1960-1996 and has shared the storys of what some did to keep the line alive, I understand and appreciate these cars history, and thats why i have high expectations you should as well.

Last edited by FutureZMan; Aug 19, 2005 at 07:33 PM.
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 07:36 PM
  #36  
FutureZMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,080
From: Sterling heights, Michigan.
Re: Problem i see in 5th Gen camaro (HP related)

Originally Posted by RussStang
Guion, I think you are misunderstand about what he is implying with his Viper example. The bar is set alot lower over in the Chevy camp, due to the base vette's 400hp. Should a competitor come out like the GT500, Dodge would have no problem releasing a car competitive with it in HP levels due to their flagship still being out of harms way. The same can't be said of the Camaro, as it hits its HP glass ceiling much quicker. Of course a Viper and Camaro can't be fairly compared, it would be a ridiculous comparison to say the least.


Although I agree with what you are saying for the most parts, there are a few points I would like to address in your post. First off, top performance may not be that important in the v6 or base v8 car, as they will be the volume sellers, and will due most of that more than likely off their style. This is easily seen in the fact that you stated, that the sn95 simply destroyed the 4th gen in sales. However, the top dog pony car draws in a different audience. An audience that is willing to pay top dollar for performance, and wants their cars to perform the best. Look at how many 03 or 04 cobras sold in comparison to previous years. That should speak volumes. I am not so worried about the performance of the base v8 5th gen Camaros, as I am sure it will be great. I ponder just what will be done with the top dog to keep it competitive.

One more point worth noting, is that, as you stated, the Camaro has not always been a top performer, but as of recently it has been, and has sold to many people on that fact. The "younger guys" like myself, this thread starter, and many others on the board, grew up with an angry, reasonably price, very high performing car, and that is what many of us perceive it as. Since the target of most car manufacturers seems to be younger buyers, I think it is important to give the style that will draw in the v6 buyers, but the performance that many of the younger guys have come to known.
The Ying to my Yang, im glad someone understood my concerns.
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 07:46 PM
  #37  
FutureZMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,080
From: Sterling heights, Michigan.
Re: Problem i see in 5th Gen camaro (HP related)

Originally Posted by notgetleft
Yeah, god forbid they bring back the last strategy that actually outsold mustang. That'd be crazy....




BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I'm a die hard chevy guy, and i wouldn't touch a 4th gen with a ten foot pole, no matter what the bang for the buck factor was. Performance does not make something the best ever, it's too easy to make ANYTHING go fast to care what it comes with from the factory. I'd rather drive a turbo civic than a 4th gen.

I only come to this forum in hopes of news that GM isn't going to repeat the 4th gen fiasco again. After all, i'm going to need a convertible in a few years...
IMHO, and usually remains the same with most die hard GM guys i know in real life is, the 305 was a bad choice to have optioned for the performer Z28, standard camaro option? Sure. Z28? No. It really just wasnt a suitable motor for a optioned up sports car, sorry.

4th gen fiasco? please enlighten me.
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 07:47 PM
  #38  
number77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Re: Problem i see in 5th Gen camaro (HP related)

I would like to see a ~400 hp base car with moderate tq, and a ~450 hp high performance model with 500 lb ft tq with flared fenders, like the c6 z06.

Last edited by number77; Aug 19, 2005 at 07:49 PM.
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 07:49 PM
  #39  
Z/28Camaro4life's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 77
From: Middle Island, NY
Re: Problem i see in 5th Gen camaro (HP related)

I hope they don't put a cap on engines like they used to. I hope since the caddy cts-v elimated that and if I had the money and really desired I could special order an ls-7 for a ton of money maybe 45,000 or 50,000 if really desired
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 07:53 PM
  #40  
FutureZMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,080
From: Sterling heights, Michigan.
Re: Problem i see in 5th Gen camaro (HP related)

Originally Posted by number77
I would like to see a ~400 hp base car with moderate tq, and a ~450 hp high performance model with 500 lb ft tq with flared fenders, like the c6 z06.
that prototype that kid made a few years back of the orange and black 69' inspired camaro was the best retro design ive ever seen.

If that car hit the streets, dealers couldnt keep enough on the lots.
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 08:00 PM
  #41  
V8 Slayer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 792
From: Long Island, NY
Re: Problem i see in 5th Gen camaro (HP related)

I agree, NO V6!

LS4 - Base (RS)
LS2 - Z28
LS7 Detuned - SS
Supercharged LS1 - IROC Z <---- ( for my personal amusement)

Honestly, if you dont want a V8. Theres plenty of smaller motor in nice cars GM has to offer...
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 08:57 PM
  #42  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Re: Problem i see in 5th Gen camaro (HP related)

Originally Posted by V8 Slayer
I agree, NO V6!

LS4 - Base (RS)
LS2 - Z28
LS7 Detuned - SS

Honestly, if you dont want a V8. Theres plenty of smaller motor in nice cars GM has to offer...
heh, and every pimple faced 16 year old f-body fan cries, you gotta have a V6 for the yutes.

V6 base
300 to 350 for the entry V8 car
400 for the high level V8 car
500 for the "you know the dealer is gonna mark this up gotta have it model)
Old Aug 19, 2005 | 10:15 PM
  #43  
FutureZMan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,080
From: Sterling heights, Michigan.
Re: Problem i see in 5th Gen camaro (HP related)

Originally Posted by bossco
heh, and every pimple faced 16 year old f-body fan cries, you gotta have a V6 for the yutes.
True, V6 definatly needs to be in place.
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 09:02 AM
  #44  
notgetleft's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 808
From: manassas, VA
Re: Problem i see in 5th Gen camaro (HP related)

Originally Posted by FutureZMan
IMHO, and usually remains the same with most die hard GM guys i know in real life is, the 305 was a bad choice to have optioned for the performer Z28, standard camaro option? Sure. Z28? No. It really just wasnt a suitable motor for a optioned up sports car, sorry.

4th gen fiasco? please enlighten me.
I'll start with your last question. The 4th gen sold worse just about every year it was out. Despite being faster and better handling than the mustang, it's total lack of styling, cheap interior, and continuation with the *** dragging seating position long past when it was popular, lead to noone but die hard guys buying them. Yeah, 20-30k total camaros per year in this millenium was a fiasco.

As for the suitability of a 305 in a Z28, it outsold LS1 fbodies didn't it? Hell, one year worth of sub-160hp LG4s probably outsold the entire LS1 camaro production. I'm not going to check the stats, someone here will correct me anyway, but i bet it's close.

And that's what this is about, selling cars. You're smoking crack if you think the fbody will survive if it comes back to the same kind of volume the 4th gen had. Give it a handful of engine options in a uniquely styled chassis with a nice interior and people will buy them. Believe it or not, the average camaro buyer cares a lot more about the car not being an uncomfortable ugly POS than if it can run 12s stock.
Old Aug 20, 2005 | 09:12 AM
  #45  
CLEAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
From: Arlington, Texas
Re: Problem i see in 5th Gen camaro (HP related)

Originally Posted by FutureZMan
IMHO, and usually remains the same with most die hard GM guys i know in real life is, the 305 was a bad choice to have optioned for the performer Z28, standard camaro option? Sure. Z28? No. It really just wasnt a suitable motor for a optioned up sports car, sorry.
What if you wanted a stick?

Also, as to your concerns about historically nothing matching Corvettes hp, I'm sure you know that isn't really the case anymore. Even if it were something Chevrolet tried to enforce, with the presense of the Z06, I would think the base Corvettes hp number isn't as hallowed as it maybe once was. Note: GTO, CTSv, STSv, SSR, Trailblazer SS, and more to come.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 AM.