Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

No AWD for the HHR says Campbell

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2005 | 03:59 PM
  #16  
Chrome383Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,043
From: Shelbyville, IN
Re: No AWD for the HHR says Campbell

Waste of money just like on the Nox.
Old Aug 13, 2005 | 04:04 PM
  #17  
Jason E's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,376
From: Sarasota FL
Re: No AWD for the HHR says Campbell

Originally Posted by redzed
It seems that DCX has been paying attention. The Dodge Calibre is going to be available with AWD and Jeep is getting a Vibe-type vehicle as well.

It seems tragic to be that GM couldn't have replaced the Toyota-sourced Vibe with a Delta based crossover - a sort of non-retro stablemate for Chevy's HHR.
Sadly, I completely agree. Speaking of killing product overlap, despite the fact I make $$ off Vibes I say kill the bastardly things (I'll just stock more G6s ) and let the HHR take over that market. Oh, but wait...we have no AWD. Well that blows a good theory.

And imagine how much BETTER an HHR would be with the 50 extra HP, nicer styling and better interior for THE SAME PRICE. Actually, the HHR offers more for less than a comparable FWD Vibe.

Chevy, you shot yourself in the *** with this one. GM, lets keep giving business to Toyota with our pseudo-American Pontiac/Toyota.

BTW, a Vibe AWD is painful to drive. Atrociously loud, and painfully slow...
Old Aug 13, 2005 | 04:21 PM
  #18  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
Re: No AWD for the HHR says Campbell

Originally Posted by Jason E

BTW, a Vibe AWD is painful to drive. Atrociously loud, and painfully slow...
i just followed a matrix with awd home after work and i almost drove through it and i just got around a grand pa in his minivan so i was used to a slow rate of acceration.
Old Aug 13, 2005 | 11:40 PM
  #19  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Re: No AWD for the HHR says Campbell

Originally Posted by Chrome383Z
Waste of money just like on the Nox.
How do you figure? It is very affordable has stand out styling, nice interior, and a lot of utility.
Old Aug 14, 2005 | 02:35 AM
  #20  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Re: No AWD for the HHR says Campbell

Which is why I said it would probably have to be with teh 2.4 only, caue of the higher hp rating over the 2.2.
Old Aug 14, 2005 | 09:40 AM
  #21  
Chrome383Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,043
From: Shelbyville, IN
Re: No AWD for the HHR says Campbell

Originally Posted by Z28x
How do you figure? It is very affordable has stand out styling, nice interior, and a lot of utility.
No, I LOVE the HHR. I'm thinking in light of higher gas prices of selling my wifes 2000 4x4 Blazer and getting one. (If I can swing the styling by her...)

What I meant IMO as a waste of money is the AWD. Adds more cost, more moving parts - for something that again IMO is NOT needed.

I only got the Blazer in 4x4 because:

1) It's hard to find one thats not.
2) Pulling a boat out of the water with just RWD when you get below the "moss" line can be interesting - and we use the Blazer to pull it every now and then. With FWD you don't have to even worry about that although I don't think the HHR could handle any towing...
Old Aug 14, 2005 | 01:29 PM
  #22  
94LightningGal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,178
From: Payson, AZ USA
Re: No AWD for the HHR says Campbell

As someone who has driven FWD in snow and ice................ and AWD in snow and ice......... I'll take AWD thank you.

If you haven't done it, you don't understand. Just like people who drive around their RWD vehicles can't understand what all the hoopla is about FWD in inclimate weather. Yes you can get there in anything. However, how much you "age" to get there is the difference. It is degrees of simplicity. RWD and snow = major white knuckles. FWD and snow = minor white knuckles. AWD and snow = driving home in annoying weather.

Modern AWD vehicles are no more problematic than any other vehicle on the road. We had a 1987 Audi 5000CS Quattro with 330,000 miles on it. The AWD system was all original. You want to know what it needed to make the drivetrain happy???? New suspension bushings. Thats it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dylan1303
Cars For Sale
6
Aug 12, 2015 02:00 AM
dylan1303
Forced Induction
5
May 22, 2015 12:24 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
May 15, 2015 10:43 AM
PacerX
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
7
Jul 20, 2003 03:34 PM
AnthonyHSV
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
3
May 25, 2003 06:32 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 AM.