New RWD Toyota/Subaru sport coupe
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,870
Originally Posted by cjmatt
the boxer sounds like garbage and get bad gas mileage...good work "ferras"
Gas mileage is decent. I think the WRX is rated at 20/27 which isn't the best but keep in mind it's a boxy AWD 3,200+lb sedan that'll run mid 5sec 0-60.
There's plenty of things i don't like about the WRX but the drivetrain isn't one of them.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Yes... I even thought about that before I posted but then decided to do it anyways.
But seriously... outside of lawyers and gearheads like us, WHO-THE-FLOCK is going to know the difference or care? If I were and WRX owner, I'd have my feathers ruffled over that comment. I've raced WRX cars and they are wicked-fast - especially on shorter tracks.
I think you goobers know what I mean.
But seriously... outside of lawyers and gearheads like us, WHO-THE-FLOCK is going to know the difference or care? If I were and WRX owner, I'd have my feathers ruffled over that comment. I've raced WRX cars and they are wicked-fast - especially on shorter tracks.
I think you goobers know what I mean.
Lots of people get wrapped around the axle with regard to two versus four doors.
Anyway, the original statement is correct. I guess the answer to your question depends on how many WRX owners think they're driving a coupe. I would have said "none", but who knows?
Would I, as a Camaro owner, get ruffled feathers over a statement that Chevy hasn't had a RWD performance sedan since 1996?
Answer: no
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 983
From: Motor City
Lots of people get wrapped around the axle with regard to two versus four doors.
Anyway, the original statement is correct. I guess the answer to your question depends on how many WRX owners think they're driving a coupe. I would have said "none", but who knows?
Would I, as a Camaro owner, get ruffled feathers over a statement that Chevy hasn't had a RWD performance sedan since 1996?
Answer: no
Anyway, the original statement is correct. I guess the answer to your question depends on how many WRX owners think they're driving a coupe. I would have said "none", but who knows?
Would I, as a Camaro owner, get ruffled feathers over a statement that Chevy hasn't had a RWD performance sedan since 1996?
Answer: no
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,180
From: Yadkinville, NC USA
A shocking number of people - including several here - will discount the performance potential of any car that has more than two doors. You could, say, park an Eclipse GT next to a Lancer Evo X, and they'd pick the two-door over the four-door as the sportier of the two 
LOL!!!
You are sooo right!
I even know some self-proclaimed gearheads that would be guilty or your scenario.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,958
From: Kansas City, MO
But would they qualify as a performance coupe? The top model we got in the U.S. was the 2.5 RS - no turbo was offered (although there was a turbo WRX version of those coupes in other markets).
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 194
From: MA
The boxer warble is a nice sound. Not for everyone, but it grows on you. Especially when the car has a couple simple mods
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Yes they would qualify as a performance coupe even though they weren't the fastest things ever.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,958
From: Kansas City, MO
I've always considered them more of a sporty coupe rather than a dedicated performance coupe. But I suppose the argument could be made that they were "performance" in that they were upgraded from a standard Impreza coupe. When I think of a performance coupe, I think more of a dedicated coupe model (not a 2 door sedan) with purely performance intentions, but it's all semantics.
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
I've always considered them more of a sporty coupe rather than a dedicated performance coupe. But I suppose the argument could be made that they were "performance" in that they were upgraded from a standard Impreza coupe. When I think of a performance coupe, I think more of a dedicated coupe model (not a 2 door sedan) with purely performance intentions, but it's all semantics.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 255
From: Warner Robins, GA
As far as this Toyota/Subaru mashup, anyone who wants a cheap fun car with good gas mileage.
I said in my original thread that if they met the goals they were targeting, that I would buy it. Never the less, the goals were extremely unrealistic($12,250, 2250lbs)...
I'm thinking that's why it hasn't been referred to as it was in the beginning...
I said in my original thread that if they met the goals they were targeting, that I would buy it. Never the less, the goals were extremely unrealistic($12,250, 2250lbs)...
I'm thinking that's why it hasn't been referred to as it was in the beginning...
Last edited by Sharker524; Apr 16, 2008 at 05:05 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,620
From: Saginaw, Michigan
The gas milage is pretty bad for the HP numbers though.
They are fun to screw around with though. A turbo adds a whole new dimension to cheap extra HP.
Dan
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
But if they're aiming for a low price, it likely won't have that. But there's always the Lexus version.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CARiD
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Sep 30, 2015 05:44 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
1
Sep 15, 2015 11:53 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Sep 14, 2015 02:02 AM
CARiD
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Sep 7, 2015 08:21 AM
