Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

New RWD Toyota/Subaru sport coupe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 10:35 PM
  #16  
Gold_Rush's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,870
Originally Posted by cjmatt
the boxer sounds like garbage and get bad gas mileage...good work "ferras"
I think the flat 4 sounds pretty good for a 4banger...especially with a good aftermarket exhaust. I happen to like it but something like exhaust-note is always subjective.

Gas mileage is decent. I think the WRX is rated at 20/27 which isn't the best but keep in mind it's a boxy AWD 3,200+lb sedan that'll run mid 5sec 0-60.

There's plenty of things i don't like about the WRX but the drivetrain isn't one of them.
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 12:02 AM
  #17  
teal98's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by ProudPony
Yes... I even thought about that before I posted but then decided to do it anyways.

But seriously... outside of lawyers and gearheads like us, WHO-THE-FLOCK is going to know the difference or care? If I were and WRX owner, I'd have my feathers ruffled over that comment. I've raced WRX cars and they are wicked-fast - especially on shorter tracks.

I think you goobers know what I mean.

Lots of people get wrapped around the axle with regard to two versus four doors.

Anyway, the original statement is correct. I guess the answer to your question depends on how many WRX owners think they're driving a coupe. I would have said "none", but who knows?

Would I, as a Camaro owner, get ruffled feathers over a statement that Chevy hasn't had a RWD performance sedan since 1996?

Answer: no
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 06:32 AM
  #18  
cjmatt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 983
From: Motor City
Originally Posted by teal98
Lots of people get wrapped around the axle with regard to two versus four doors.

Anyway, the original statement is correct. I guess the answer to your question depends on how many WRX owners think they're driving a coupe. I would have said "none", but who knows?

Would I, as a Camaro owner, get ruffled feathers over a statement that Chevy hasn't had a RWD performance sedan since 1996?

Answer: no
G8, STS...not chevy, but still gm
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 09:18 AM
  #19  
ProudPony's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,180
From: Yadkinville, NC USA
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
A shocking number of people - including several here - will discount the performance potential of any car that has more than two doors. You could, say, park an Eclipse GT next to a Lancer Evo X, and they'd pick the two-door over the four-door as the sportier of the two

LOL!!!

You are sooo right!
I even know some self-proclaimed gearheads that would be guilty or your scenario.
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 09:48 AM
  #20  
Eric77TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,958
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
They had 2 door Imprezas from 1995 until the end of the generation in 2000, which was later than the SVX which died in 1997.
But would they qualify as a performance coupe? The top model we got in the U.S. was the 2.5 RS - no turbo was offered (although there was a turbo WRX version of those coupes in other markets).
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 10:54 AM
  #21  
Supergrobo82's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 194
From: MA
Originally Posted by Jim the Nomad
I know this isn't an opinion shared by many, but I actually like the sound of subaru's boxer engine.

I don't know if I actually ENJOY the sound, but it's definitely distinct, and I appreciate that.

The boxer warble is a nice sound. Not for everyone, but it grows on you. Especially when the car has a couple simple mods
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 03:36 PM
  #22  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Originally Posted by Eric77TA
But would they qualify as a performance coupe? The top model we got in the U.S. was the 2.5 RS - no turbo was offered (although there was a turbo WRX version of those coupes in other markets).
Yes they would qualify as a performance coupe even though they weren't the fastest things ever.
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 03:50 PM
  #23  
Eric77TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,958
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
Yes they would qualify as a performance coupe even though they weren't the fastest things ever.
I've always considered them more of a sporty coupe rather than a dedicated performance coupe. But I suppose the argument could be made that they were "performance" in that they were upgraded from a standard Impreza coupe. When I think of a performance coupe, I think more of a dedicated coupe model (not a 2 door sedan) with purely performance intentions, but it's all semantics.
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 05:04 PM
  #24  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Its about time!
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 07:16 PM
  #25  
93Phoenix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 392
From: Roch, NY
Whose gonna buy all these sport cars thats are coming out?
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 07:38 PM
  #26  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Originally Posted by Eric77TA
I've always considered them more of a sporty coupe rather than a dedicated performance coupe. But I suppose the argument could be made that they were "performance" in that they were upgraded from a standard Impreza coupe. When I think of a performance coupe, I think more of a dedicated coupe model (not a 2 door sedan) with purely performance intentions, but it's all semantics.
I see your point as well. I just think that it manages to squeak in the door. But you are right it is purely semantics.
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 05:03 PM
  #27  
Sharker524's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 255
From: Warner Robins, GA
Originally Posted by 93Phoenix
Whose gonna buy all these sport cars thats are coming out?
As far as this Toyota/Subaru mashup, anyone who wants a cheap fun car with good gas mileage.

I said in my original thread that if they met the goals they were targeting, that I would buy it. Never the less, the goals were extremely unrealistic($12,250, 2250lbs)...

I'm thinking that's why it hasn't been referred to as it was in the beginning...

Last edited by Sharker524; Apr 16, 2008 at 05:05 PM.
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 07:58 PM
  #28  
stereomandan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,620
From: Saginaw, Michigan
Originally Posted by Gold_Rush
I think the flat 4 sounds pretty good for a 4banger...especially with a good aftermarket exhaust. I happen to like it but something like exhaust-note is always subjective.
I'll second that. I think it's the best 4 banger sound, hands down.

The gas milage is pretty bad for the HP numbers though.

They are fun to screw around with though. A turbo adds a whole new dimension to cheap extra HP.

Dan
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 11:57 PM
  #29  
teal98's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by stereomandan
I'll second that. I think it's the best 4 banger sound, hands down.

The gas milage is pretty bad for the HP numbers though.

They are fun to screw around with though. A turbo adds a whole new dimension to cheap extra HP.

Dan
I'll tell you what interests me -- the flat 6 from the Legacy/Outback. That flat 6 sound in a RWD sports coupe....

But if they're aiming for a low price, it likely won't have that. But there's always the Lexus version.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
G-BODYT56
Parts For Sale
6
Jan 14, 2022 11:14 PM
CARiD
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Sep 30, 2015 05:44 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
1
Sep 15, 2015 11:53 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Sep 14, 2015 02:02 AM
CARiD
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Sep 7, 2015 08:21 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 AM.