New 05 Mustang Pics... new taillights
Originally posted by Z284ever
Reno brings up a good point on international sales of Mustang (and by extension Camaro). If these cars were compact enough and properly equipped, why couldn't they sell well overseas.
The 4th gen Camaro was a complete failure in the Euro market. Find some British mag road tests of it, and they are not shy about telling why.
Does anyone remember the 3rd gen Z28E. It was an '82 Z/28 decked out for Europe. It had some cosmetic tweaks (which looked pretty decent) and NO smog gear....
Reno brings up a good point on international sales of Mustang (and by extension Camaro). If these cars were compact enough and properly equipped, why couldn't they sell well overseas.
The 4th gen Camaro was a complete failure in the Euro market. Find some British mag road tests of it, and they are not shy about telling why.
Does anyone remember the 3rd gen Z28E. It was an '82 Z/28 decked out for Europe. It had some cosmetic tweaks (which looked pretty decent) and NO smog gear....
I think that if the carmakers would just make that little special effort to tailor the cars for these people (like the turbo diesel idea) they would sell VERY well abroad. Except for Iraq, Libya, and a few others for obvious reasons, what nation in this world hasn't longed for the American Icons... Blue Jeans, Coke/Pepsi, McDonalds(?), and our CARS?
Great topic that rarely gets talked about! Charlie, Reno... very insightful stuff there guys!
Last edited by ProudPony; Feb 6, 2003 at 07:07 AM.
Originally posted by guess who
I had to comment on the rear window visability.
This is the BACK window for heavens sake.That "issue" is nonexistant.
The car has a roofline to a 65 "NOT" a 67.
I had to comment on the rear window visability.
This is the BACK window for heavens sake.That "issue" is nonexistant.
The car has a roofline to a 65 "NOT" a 67.

1965 Fastback
1967 Fastback
Originally posted by Darth Xed
Is there really that much difference in the 65 & 67 rooflines?
1965 Fastback
1967 Fastback
Is there really that much difference in the 65 & 67 rooflines?

1965 Fastback
1967 Fastback
1965 Fastback
1967
Originally posted by guess who
There is a great deal if you get the RIGHT picture.
1965 Fastback
1967
There is a great deal if you get the RIGHT picture.
1965 Fastback
1967
The roofline (in profile anyway) is very similar...
Just because the pic I used of a 67 Fastback was of one in need of a resto doesn't change the shape of it's roofline...
The 65-66 fastback roofline stopped about a foot short of the rear of the car, leaving a small horizontal trunk. The 67-68 was a true fastback and went all the way back. The cars look more different in person than in photos.
BTW, if there's one thing I hope they bring back, it's the rear seats that fold flat and are perfectly concealed, making it look like a 2-seater. That was always cool as hell.
BTW, if there's one thing I hope they bring back, it's the rear seats that fold flat and are perfectly concealed, making it look like a 2-seater. That was always cool as hell.
Originally posted by Darth Xed
Now, your 67 shot isn't a profile shot at all...
The roofline (in profile anyway) is very similar...
Just because the pic I used of a 67 Fastback was of one in need of a resto doesn't change the shape of it's roofline...
Now, your 67 shot isn't a profile shot at all...
The roofline (in profile anyway) is very similar...
Just because the pic I used of a 67 Fastback was of one in need of a resto doesn't change the shape of it's roofline...
I know you put that pic in there for a reason.And yes my shot was more to the 65 you put then the 67 you put.
Im done waisting my time with your stupid responses good day sir.
Originally posted by guess who
I know you put that pic in there for a reason.And yes my shot was more to the 65 you put then the 67 you put.
Im done waisting my time with your stupid responses good day sir.
I know you put that pic in there for a reason.And yes my shot was more to the 65 you put then the 67 you put.
Im done waisting my time with your stupid responses good day sir.
I did an image search on www.google.com , and that was the picture that best showed the PROFILE of the 67.
What the hell does the conditionof the car matter?!?!?!?
So
to YOUR stupid response.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
1
Jul 8, 2015 06:47 PM



