Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Motor Trend "Bang for the Bucks" list

Old Dec 5, 2004 | 06:17 PM
  #16  
Beanboy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 233
Re: Motor Trend "Bang for the Bucks" list

94_Z28_ragtop, the Legacy GT is a nice car!

-B
Old Dec 5, 2004 | 07:58 PM
  #17  
Andrew R's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 319
From: Ottawa, KS
Re: Motor Trend "Bang for the Bucks" list

In the last few years of production, wasnt the base Z28 only around 24k? If so thats one hell of a deal for a high 12/low 13 second car.
Old Dec 5, 2004 | 08:13 PM
  #18  
94_Z28_ragtop's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 585
From: Livonia, MI
Re: Motor Trend "Bang for the Bucks" list

Originally Posted by Andrew Rhines
In the last few years of production, wasnt the base Z28 only around 24k? If so thats one hell of a deal for a high 12/low 13 second car.
My 2002 Z28 is a stripper with the only options being Eagle GS-C tires and rear defrost. It stickered at just under $24,000. I get the GMS discount. Out the door I paid $19,800 and that included sales tax, title and plates. I think the actual purchase price was $18,700 or so.
Old Dec 5, 2004 | 08:37 PM
  #19  
Andrew R's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 319
From: Ottawa, KS
Re: Motor Trend "Bang for the Bucks" list

Originally Posted by 94_Z28_ragtop
My 2002 Z28 is a stripper with the only options being Eagle GS-C tires and rear defrost. It stickered at just under $24,000. I get the GMS discount. Out the door I paid $19,800 and that included sales tax, title and plates. I think the actual purchase price was $18,700 or so.
Man thats one hell of a steal. To bad most dealers orderd moderate to fully loaded cars that cost around 30-35k...Hmm...Do we see the same pattern being priced high?

BTW Ragtop, on your stripper model, what options came with your car standard? pw, pl, cruise?
Old Dec 5, 2004 | 09:09 PM
  #20  
Jason E's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,376
From: Sarasota FL
Re: Motor Trend "Bang for the Bucks" list

Originally Posted by WERM
Hey, don't feel bad about buying a Subie - They have many employees in the good 'ol US of A, and in fact, the Legacy is made in Indiana. Chances are, you know at least one of them.

Besides, loyalty is a two way street and GM hasn't held up their end of the bargain.
I agree with everything you said, however consider this. When you buy that Subaru, where does the profit go? It certainly does not stay in the US. I love it when people tell me they bought an American car because their Camry was built in KY...not quite, folks.

No flames intended, and this is merely an opinion...and we all know what opinions are worth. But it is something I think more people should at least think about...
Old Dec 5, 2004 | 09:19 PM
  #21  
94_Z28_ragtop's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 585
From: Livonia, MI
Re: Motor Trend "Bang for the Bucks" list

Originally Posted by Andrew Rhines
BTW Ragtop, on your stripper model, what options came with your car standard? pw, pl, cruise?
Uhh....no, no & no. It does have the Monsoon audio and A/C standard. Crank windows, manual locks, no cruise, manual seats, etc. It truly is a stripper.

Originally Posted by Jason E
I agree with everything you said, however consider this. When you buy that Subaru, where does the profit go? It certainly does not stay in the US. I love it when people tell me they bought an American car because their Camry was built in KY...not quite, folks.
That's very true to an extent. There are more than a few foreign car companies with the big 3 as parents or partial owners. Example:

GM - owns Saab & Daewoo. Part owner of Subaru, Fuji Heavy Ind. (Isuzu)

Ford - owns Volvo, Jaguar, Land Rover. Part owner of Mazda.

Chrysler - Now owned by Germans so who cares what they own! That means by your logic you can't buy any Chrysler vehicles because the profits go to Germany.

No flames intended. I really do agree with you. I'm looking at it more and more like this, though. Some manufacturing industry is better for our countries economy than none so I'd rather have those transplants here than not.
Old Dec 5, 2004 | 10:31 PM
  #22  
Ken S's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,368
From: OR
Re: Motor Trend "Bang for the Bucks" list

well trouble with the 4th gen Camaro's, was the performance great (with the odd trait of solid rear axle), but the build quality(both real and percieved) and refinement were bottom of the barrel in that pricerange..

Subaru Legacy GT or the MazdaSpeed 6.. nice choices!

Wish GM had a midsized V8 RWD performance 4 door sedan that would be a viable alternative to a turbo'd AWD performance sedan.
Old Dec 5, 2004 | 10:44 PM
  #23  
WERM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,873
From: South Jersey
Re: Motor Trend "Bang for the Bucks" list

Originally Posted by Jason E
I agree with everything you said, however consider this. When you buy that Subaru, where does the profit go? It certainly does not stay in the US. I love it when people tell me they bought an American car because their Camry was built in KY...not quite, folks.

No flames intended, and this is merely an opinion...and we all know what opinions are worth. But it is something I think more people should at least think about...
Consider that these transplants employ thousands of americans and most of these companies believe in manufacturing locally (for the local market). They encourage their suppliers to also manufacture locally (translation: jobs), and have a close working relationship with them to help each other earn a profit. Meanwhile the big 2.5 have an adverserial relationship with suppliers and demand low (or no) margins ('China pricing') on all parts and are essentially forcing suppliers to source parts in asia as far as the eye can see. So soon when that new made in the USA GM car has mostly foreign parts ask yourself... which is more American? It's not so clear anymore.
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 02:42 AM
  #24  
steve2002's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 262
From: Oranje County
Re: Motor Trend "Bang for the Bucks" list

Originally Posted by WERM
Consider that these transplants employ thousands of americans and most of these companies believe in manufacturing locally (for the local market). They encourage their suppliers to also manufacture locally (translation: jobs), and have a close working relationship with them to help each other earn a profit. Meanwhile the big 2.5 have an adverserial relationship with suppliers and demand low (or no) margins ('China pricing') on all parts and are essentially forcing suppliers to source parts in asia as far as the eye can see. So soon when that new made in the USA GM car has mostly foreign parts ask yourself... which is more American? It's not so clear anymore.
Well said.
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 02:47 AM
  #25  
steve2002's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 262
From: Oranje County
Re: Motor Trend "Bang for the Bucks" list

There is actually a very technical formula the government issues manufacturers in order for it to claim it was 'built in xxx, USA'...and the bottom line is that it has to sum up 51% only. I can't remember if it was by gross weight, value or what to be honest, buts very easily to manipulate.
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 07:13 AM
  #26  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Re: Motor Trend "Bang for the Bucks" list

Originally Posted by MissedShift
We dont need leather. We dont need onstar. We dont need 6 disc cd changers. We dont need power ashtrays. We need glorious simplicity. N/A V8, manual transmission, RWD. Make the other stuff optional, but theres no reason to have another performance model that has five or ten grand worth of googaws tacked onto the badass driveline version of the vehicle.

I mean, Im not going to order a V8 with no air, no stereo, and manual windows, but I dont need lighted key slots and ventilated seats either yanno?
This is a good way to kill the car before it even hits the streets.

No one (relatively speaking) wants this kind of thing anymore.

People WANT leather. Heck, you can get it in trucks and in Cobalts now.
People WANT OnStar. It is a significant safety and convience item.
Peopel WANT 6 Disc changers.
etc, etc ect...

Want we NEED is a kick *** car that offers all the goodies that is priced like the new Mustang.

They can do it, why can't we?
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 11:41 AM
  #27  
Jason E's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,376
From: Sarasota FL
Re: Motor Trend "Bang for the Bucks" list

Apparently we don't feel like it.
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 12:03 PM
  #28  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Re: Motor Trend "Bang for the Bucks" list

Originally Posted by Jason E
Apparently we don't feel like it.
Sad. But, so far... true.
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 12:18 PM
  #29  
OutsiderIROC-Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,688
From: Middle of Kansas
Re: Motor Trend "Bang for the Bucks" list

Yup
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 29, 2015 07:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Jan 11, 2015 06:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 28, 2014 06:20 PM
ChrisFrez
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
2
Dec 7, 2014 11:32 AM
Z284ever
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
10
Sep 11, 2002 02:58 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM.