More Silverado SS Pics

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

06-28-2002, 11:57 PM

#16

Z284ever

Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2000

Location: Chicagoland IL

Posts: 16,179

I think they did a "nice" job on the Silverado SS....considering what they had to start with. The base 2003 Siverado's styling..I think...is a monstrosity.

I'm thankful that John Cafaro is designing trucks now...and not Camaros.

Considering what Chevy had to start with ....they've done a good job of "perfuming the pig".

06-29-2002, 12:10 AM

#17

Chuck!

Registered User

Join Date: Aug 1999

Location: Cincinnati, OH

Posts: 2,612

Bland engine, bland exterior. What are they expecting to use to sell this truck? The AWD? C3 anyone?

It isnt possible for GM to make this truck any worse. At this point I'd rather not see it produced. Anyone who buys this over a Lightning is either too brand loyal or is blind.

07-01-2002, 12:11 PM

#18

RiceEating5.0

Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2001

Posts: 1,313

*yawn*

07-01-2002, 02:39 PM

#19

Reno Leigh

Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2000

Location: South Bend, Indiana

Posts: 100

Quote:

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Z284ever:
I think they did a "nice" job on the Silverado SS....considering what they had to start with. The base 2003 Siverado's styling..I think...is a monstrosity.

I'm thankful that John Cafaro is designing trucks now...and not Camaros.

Considering what Chevy had to start with ....they've done a good job of "perfuming the pig".</font>

I agree with you perfectly. I am done buying GM trucks until the basic looks improve dramatically.

I dont understand why they still keep wanting to use the controversial angry insect Aztek/Avalanche look on their new 2003 bread and butter products.

And I thought that spear crap was supposed to be axed too.

Is GM too big and slow still to stop the foreward inertia of lame styling concepts like this?