Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

More GTO news....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 05:11 PM
  #256  
SGT Posaune's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 413
From: Mannheim, Germany
Re: More GTO news....

Originally Posted by Z284ever
The pushrod 3.9 is, I'm pretty sure, about the same or less cost than a DOHC, 4 valve Ecotec. Doubt a base Camaro will come with a fancy 18" wheel/tire combo or Bilstien coil over shocks, as the base Solstice does either. Expect a standard lighter duty manual in a base Camaro (not a T-56)...who knows, even the same Aisin the Solstice has.

The point I'm making is, the cost difference of a convertible top compared to a same model coupe is usuallu $3-5K. That would more than cover the options you listed on a coupe....including the 2 extra seats.
Then why hasn't a successful case been made for a 2+2 kappa coupe?

also
The Solstices' convertible top is probably on the 3k side of that or less. It is a bare bones top. A fully loaded Solstice MSRPs around 25k and GM doesn't wxpect to make much of a profit from the solstice, if any, a base camaro must at least brake even if it is going to survive.
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 05:13 PM
  #257  
SGT Posaune's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 413
From: Mannheim, Germany
Re: More GTO news....

Originally Posted by 97z28/m6
where's the folding soft top thats standard on the solstice.
Where is the profit ford will make?

Last edited by SGT Posaune; Aug 28, 2005 at 05:20 PM.
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 05:20 PM
  #258  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
Re: More GTO news....

Originally Posted by SGT Posaune
Where is the profit for will make?
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 05:28 PM
  #259  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Re: More GTO news....

And GM looses money on each one sold, Pontiac came out and said that. Now 20k units a year GM can deal with 100k+ it will NOT!
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 05:28 PM
  #260  
SGT Posaune's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 413
From: Mannheim, Germany
Re: More GTO news....

Originally Posted by 97z28/m6
opps...fixed it
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 05:32 PM
  #261  
transam8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 936
From: Butler, PA
Re: More GTO news....

Originally Posted by Z284ever
The pushrod 3.9 is, I'm pretty sure, about the same or less cost than a DOHC, 4 valve Ecotec. Doubt a base Camaro will come with a fancy 18" wheel/tire combo or Bilstien coil over shocks, as the base Solstice does either. Expect a standard lighter duty manual in a base Camaro (not a T-56)...who knows, even the same Aisin the Solstice has.

The point I'm making is, the cost difference of a convertible top compared to a same model coupe is usuallu $3-5K. That would more than cover the options you listed on a coupe....including the 2 extra seats.
A base Camaro wouldn't need things such as a T-56, but it's upper models would. Unless there is to be a very large price difference between the base car and V8 cars, they must share alot of components. The car would have to be designed from the getgo to accept transmissions, auto and manual, that could withstand the power outputs of the V8 model(s). I doubt the Solstice's Aisin unit could handle it. I'm not just talking about the transmissions' power cababilities, but the designs of crossmembers, floor pans, center consols, etc. In addition to that, those aluminum suspension components would have to be up to the task of handling 400+ horsepower, even if the base car is only pushing 250. As was stated before, 20-30 inches would have to be added to the Solstice (just using it as an example) to get the Camaro up to "pony car" territory. That costs money. After that, just stretch the cabin to accept another seat, right? Sadly, the car would then have to be (to the best of my knowledge) re-crash tested, which equals more $. It would not be an easy or inexpensive process. The Solstice can do it for $19995, but I very much doubt a vehicle that is significantly larger, with several different models, and a myriad of changes could.

As to the cost difference between coupes and convertables, I admittedly am not an expert, but was the Solstice/Sky not designed to be a convertable from the beginning? It seems to me, that would negate some of that cost difference.

I would love nothing more than for GM to build a car to my exact personal specification, but it ain't gonna happen. The Camaro will not be coming from a coachbuilder's or Chip Foose's shop. The 5th gen must appeal to a wide audience. The car must be semi-practical for everyday use. Sadly, for hardcore enthusiasts and me , the car must be able to do more than be an autox toy, drag vehicle, or occasional weekend crusier. I'm not saying that it shouldn't do those things too, but it needs to be accessible to the people who will decide whether the car enjoys long term success or not............the average joe.


-Mike
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 05:36 PM
  #262  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: More GTO news....

Originally Posted by transam8
A base Camaro wouldn't need things such as a T-56, but it's upper models would. Unless there is to be a very large price difference between the base car and V8 cars, they must share alot of components. The car would have to be designed from the getgo to accept transmissions, auto and manual, that could withstand the power outputs of the V8 model(s). I doubt the Solstice's Aisin unit could handle it. I'm not just talking about the transmissions' power cababilities, but the designs of crossmembers, floor pans, center consols, etc. In addition to that, those aluminum suspension components would have to be up to the task of handling 400+ horsepower, even if the base car is only pushing 250. As was stated before, 20-30 inches would have to be added to the Solstice (just using it as an example) to get the Camaro up to "pony car" territory. That costs money. After that, just stretch the cabin to accept another seat, right? Sadly, the car would then have to be (to the best of my knowledge) re-crash tested, which equals more $. It would not be an easy or inexpensive process. The Solstice can do it for $19995, but I very much doubt a vehicle that is significantly larger, with several different models, and a myriad of changes could.

As to the cost difference between coupes and convertables, I admittedly am not an expert, but was the Solstice/Sky not designed to be a convertable from the beginning? It seems to me, that would negate some of that cost difference.

I would love nothing more than for GM to build a car to my exact personal specification, but it ain't gonna happen. The Camaro will not be coming from a coachbuilder's or Chip Foose's shop. The 5th gen must appeal to a wide audience. The car must be semi-practical for everyday use. Sadly, for hardcore enthusiasts and me , the car must be able to do more than be an autox toy, drag vehicle, or occasional weekend crusier. I'm not saying that it shouldn't do those things too, but it needs to be accessible to the people who will decide whether the car enjoys long term success or not............the average joe.


-Mike
Believe it or not, I agree 100%.

But the original point was in reference to Guy's $20,000 statement.
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 05:39 PM
  #263  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
Re: More GTO news....

Originally Posted by SGT Posaune
Where is the profit ford will make?
thats my point. for $20k you get a hand built low volume convertable even ford can't do that plus if you take those things out you'll save $$$ enough to add things like pws, pdls a/c etc.
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 05:45 PM
  #264  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: More GTO news....

Originally Posted by SGT Posaune
Then why hasn't a successful case been made for a 2+2 kappa coupe?

.
It's been looked at, trust me. But adding another row of seats, V8 and 400-ish hp would require so many changes - not much would be left of Kappa. It would need to be essentially ALL NEW.
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 05:58 PM
  #265  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Re: More GTO news....

BigDarkNFast, your posts are rife with your own assumptions, and there is always at the very least one area of your post that is insulting in nature. I don't know how Dan has restrained himself from firing back as long as he has. I would be really appreciative if you could focus at your own arguement at hand, and actually read what the dude has to write, instead of skimming it really quickly so you can get your two cents in.
Eh? I read all his posts. I only challenged the more questionable points (there'd be more I could bring up but I'm not sure why I should bother). If that offends you, sorry. Maybe you should skip reading this thread, unless you have something meaningful to add...
...maybe the real reason you're irritated is you know I'm right and you wish he was, due to some agenda of your own (one indication: your lack of meaningful posts refuting my points). Perhaps you should become a 240Z owner too.

You have no basis to believe he is an "import lover", despite your gut instinct. Seems to me if he was an import lover, he could give have a crap about the new Camaro at all. Another assumption on your part, with no secure basis in reality.
Wow, talk about selective reading. Here are a few Dan B. posts to jog your memory:

Cobalt?! A fwd 3000 lb uglimobile? Why on earth would I be interested in something like that? No redeeming qualities whatsoever. Believe me a Cobalt is not even on my radar.
Wish I could point you to a page that shows how make an Fbody keep up with a slightly modded 240Z at road courses, but no such page exists
GM has a huge opportunity here to make a GREAT car. A LANDMARK car. But they will blow it. Figure gas is likely going to be over $5.00/gal by the time it comes out, imagine a 3000 lb. Camaro that gets over 30mpg, vs. the lard-*** Mustang. It would have better performance in all aspects, and better economy. But they will blow it and have a 3600+ lb. guzzler that will arrive just as market demand evaporates completely.
That's what I THINK is LIKELY. I am totally open to being wrong when/if the car comes out. I'd be thrilled to be wrong! I WANT to be wrong! But word is the new Camaro will be based on a luxury sedan platform. So I worry...
GM has a hit with the Corvette, therefore any future GM rwd performance car will automatically be a hit, of course! But didn't the Fbod just fricking DIE a few years back? I'd call that "bombing out". How could that possibly have happened
How GM managed to not be able to sell LS1 Fbodies vs. the Mustang is beyond me.
How did Toyota make an inexpensive sports car (MR2Spyder) that weighs 2200 lb? They made weight a PRIORITY. How has Mazda kept weight pretty much in check at 2400 lb. with the also-relatively-inexpensive Miata? Weight is a bigger priority for that program. You don't have to go to exotic materials or construction to get weight down. And even if you do, if you're smart enough about it it doesn't have to break the bank. Conisider the Lotus Elise: just under 2000 lb., aluminum construction, at $45,000 for a low-volume baby exotic. That ain't bad, way cheaper than the much higher-volume Boxster.
If you want to know why I'm still driving that dear old Datsun, bring yourself to the track, and bring WHATEVER car you can muster. ANYTHING. And I will SHOW you
Nooo, none of THOSE statements were inflammatory. None of those things would cause someone who loves GM's cars and trucks to get a little annoyed and post a reply. Oh no

I've no objection if another member loves imports and posts about it here... and even if I did, I have no authority to do anything about it. But what, exactly, do people expect to happen when they come to this site (hint: check the URL) and brag about how great their Datsun is at the track and how it dominates FBodies and Corvettes? And about how keen are the Lotus Elitist, the Toyota MR2, and of course the fabled ancient Datsun Z-car? I agree Dan B also made some positive-on-GM posts such as complimenting the weight discipline on the Corvette... that's great. But don't expect me to sit by idly when someone makes statements like the above. No sir. I have all the respect in the world for Dan B. the CamaroZ28.com member, and his racing accomplishments too for that matter. (Moreso than he does for me, judging by what he has been calling me ) But don't come into a Denver Bronco's bar ripping on the Bronco's without expecting some... reactions

Purple. At least we agree on one thing!

http://mwshowgo67.com/formula95/images/p062604_1644.JPG
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 06:16 PM
  #266  
SGT Posaune's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 413
From: Mannheim, Germany
Re: More GTO news....

Originally Posted by 97z28/m6
thats my point. for $20k you get a hand built low volume convertable even ford can't do that plus if you take those things out you'll save $$$ enough to add things like pws, pdls a/c etc.
But the Camaro won't be "a hand built low volume car". It must be a mass produced car that can be profitable. *see mustang

How many base Solstices do you think GM will sell? GM did that just so they could say they can, not because they expect to sell a lot that way.

How many base Mustangs do you think Ford will sell? Remember, they are priced the same.

Expect a Camaro optioned and priced like the Mustang.

How about this. Replace all of the alloy parts you can with steel like the Camaro will have and take away the Convertible and leave it optioned the same (a very striped car). How much would it cost? How many would sell?
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 06:20 PM
  #267  
SGT Posaune's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 413
From: Mannheim, Germany
Re: More GTO news....

Originally Posted by Z284ever
It's been looked at, trust me. But adding another row of seats, V8 and 400-ish hp would require so many changes - not much would be left of Kappa. It would need to be essentially ALL NEW.
Leave the ecotec in. It would be a modern Vega.
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 06:21 PM
  #268  
SGT Posaune's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 413
From: Mannheim, Germany
Re: More GTO news....

In stead of talking about kappa, why not start with Sigma and how to turn it into a pony car chassis, like what is happening...
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 06:41 PM
  #269  
graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,887
From: northeast Miss.
Re: More GTO news....

Originally Posted by guionM
The Gospel.
At age 24 I sometimes think I have a better feel for business decisions than most here.

That being said... I need to put the finishing touches on my proposition for a chromoly fabricated 9" rearend for the F5.... (j/k)
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 06:46 PM
  #270  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Re: More GTO news....

Originally Posted by SGT Posaune
In stead of talking about kappa, why not start with Sigma and how to turn it into a pony car chassis, like what is happening...
The "new" Zeta will be more Sigma based than the "old" V-car based Zeta. But like Ford's D2C and DEW98.....it will end up being essentially a new platform.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49 AM.