Mopar SEMA sneak peek.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Re: Mopar SEMA sneak peek.
that durango truck, a faster pt cruiser, a faster magnum, a crossfire, looks like a performance version, and a lifted rumble bee. notice the hood tone. maybe that is a hint that the charger will come with a black hood (it was done in the old days for those that are unfamiliar)
Registered User
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 858
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Re: Mopar SEMA sneak peek.
Originally Posted by number77
maybe that is a hint that the charger will come with a black hood (it was done in the old days for those that are unfamiliar)
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Re: Mopar SEMA sneak peek.
Originally Posted by MissedShift
Was it ever done on Charger? I know it was done on Cuda, Road Runner, and Super Bee, but I dont recall ever seeing a factory Charger with a flat black hood.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,724
From: Hebron, KY
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Grand Prix GXP... weird
Something I read in the article regarding the GXP:
Want another sign this Pontiac performance thing has real traction—and not only in the sales marketing sense? Once
engineers decided 18x8-inch rubber was required for the front-drive wheels, they made an un-GM-like decision: They fit the rears with narrower 18x7-inch tires for what they believe to be a better-balanced handling package.
“We were leading the market in front-wheel-drive performance,” says program engineering manager Phillip Minch. “But
we wanted to own the market.”
Anyone else think it's retarded? Just imagine, 245 up front and 225 at the rear?
edit: since when were they EVER leading the market in front-wheel-drive performance? are they really totally oblivious to the world outside of Detroit?
Want another sign this Pontiac performance thing has real traction—and not only in the sales marketing sense? Once
engineers decided 18x8-inch rubber was required for the front-drive wheels, they made an un-GM-like decision: They fit the rears with narrower 18x7-inch tires for what they believe to be a better-balanced handling package.
“We were leading the market in front-wheel-drive performance,” says program engineering manager Phillip Minch. “But
we wanted to own the market.”
Anyone else think it's retarded? Just imagine, 245 up front and 225 at the rear?
edit: since when were they EVER leading the market in front-wheel-drive performance? are they really totally oblivious to the world outside of Detroit?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Jul 17, 2015 02:47 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
1
Dec 15, 2014 03:09 PM