Is Lightning Back On??
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 146
Re: Is Lightning Back On??
Originally Posted by IREngineer
I would be interested to see the weight differences between the V10 and SCV8. I bet they are pretty comparable.
Btw, how did the old V10's sound? I don't think I've ever heard one.
Btw, how did the old V10's sound? I don't think I've ever heard one.
You know I was in/or had a V10 SD for the night a long time ago. I do not remeber anything dd or interesting about it. But faulty memory could play into it. But nothing stood out from my recollection.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 854
From: neverneverland
Re: Is Lightning Back On??
Originally Posted by evok
Don't know the weight difference between the two.
You know I was in/or had a V10 SD for the night a long time ago. I do not remeber anything dd or interesting about it. But faulty memory could play into it. But nothing stood out from my recollection.
You know I was in/or had a V10 SD for the night a long time ago. I do not remeber anything dd or interesting about it. But faulty memory could play into it. But nothing stood out from my recollection.
I don't think even the savants at Ford exhaust development could make a V10 sound good based on what I've heard from Vipers. I just don't like it...
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 236
From: West Salem,IL
Re: Is Lightning Back On??
Originally Posted by 96_Camaro_B4C
Well, the Syclone was first (did you mean Syclone and Typhoon? Instead of Cyclone and Syclone? 
). But I believe the first gen Lightning (with a 240 hp 5.8L), which was on the F150 of 2 generations back, was out before (or at the same time as) the 454SS (SS had a a bit less peak power IIRC, but made MONSTER torque). They were about equal in a straight line, but the Lightning was the better handler, IIRC (17" wheels, etc.).
But yes, the Cyclone was before both. However, it was very limited in volume and "truck" abilities, and was discontinued. The Lightning was more at the forefront of the modern "performance truck", particularly since for whatever reason, the focus has been on full sizes.
). But I believe the first gen Lightning (with a 240 hp 5.8L), which was on the F150 of 2 generations back, was out before (or at the same time as) the 454SS (SS had a a bit less peak power IIRC, but made MONSTER torque). They were about equal in a straight line, but the Lightning was the better handler, IIRC (17" wheels, etc.). But yes, the Cyclone was before both. However, it was very limited in volume and "truck" abilities, and was discontinued. The Lightning was more at the forefront of the modern "performance truck", particularly since for whatever reason, the focus has been on full sizes.
What about the dodge lil red express wasnt it the fastest american production vehicle in the years it was produced.
If they do bring the lightning back I think it should be radically different than the regular f-150 style wise.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Re: Is Lightning Back On??
Originally Posted by daddytrav
What about the dodge lil red express wasnt it the fastest american production vehicle in the years it was produced.
If they do bring the lightning back I think it should be radically different than the regular f-150 style wise.
If they do bring the lightning back I think it should be radically different than the regular f-150 style wise.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,215
From: Coppell, Texas
Re: Is Lightning Back On??
Originally Posted by daddytrav
What about the dodge lil red express wasnt it the fastest american production vehicle in the years it was produced.
although this is coming from a Camaro driver...
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 236
From: West Salem,IL
Re: Is Lightning Back On??
Originally Posted by Sixer-Bird
BTW, that vehicle gets my vote for the "most appealing to the white-trash demographic" award.
although this is coming from a Camaro driver...
although this is coming from a Camaro driver...
I would have to agree, though i thought it was a nice looking vehicle. Those "stacks" werent right for that truck but then again I guess it was unique
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,178
From: Payson, AZ USA
Re: Is Lightning Back On??
Originally Posted by 96_Camaro_B4C
Well, the Syclone was first (did you mean Syclone and Typhoon? Instead of Cyclone and Syclone? ). But I believe the first gen Lightning (with a 240 hp 5.8L), which was on the F150 of 2 generations back, was out before (or at the same time as) the 454SS (SS had a a bit less peak power IIRC, but made MONSTER torque). They were about equal in a straight line, but the Lightning was the better handler, IIRC (17" wheels, etc.).
But yes, the Cyclone was before both. However, it was very limited in volume and "truck" abilities, and was discontinued. The Lightning was more at the forefront of the modern "performance truck", particularly since for whatever reason, the focus has been on full sizes.
). But I believe the first gen Lightning (with a 240 hp 5.8L), which was on the F150 of 2 generations back, was out before (or at the same time as) the 454SS (SS had a a bit less peak power IIRC, but made MONSTER torque). They were about equal in a straight line, but the Lightning was the better handler, IIRC (17" wheels, etc.). But yes, the Cyclone was before both. However, it was very limited in volume and "truck" abilities, and was discontinued. The Lightning was more at the forefront of the modern "performance truck", particularly since for whatever reason, the focus has been on full sizes.
One of the biggest problems the Syclone and Typhoon had, were their horribly high pricetag, and complete lack of utility. The Syclone had a bed you couldn't use (payload was enough for two people, and a Playmate cooler), but at least it was very fast. The Typhoon was heavier, more expensive, not as fast, and still had no payload (see Syclone).
The Lightning became successful because it was reasonably priced, damn quick for its day, handled amazingly for a truck, and still had truck utility.
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 248
Re: Is Lightning Back On??
Originally Posted by IREngineer
That's too bad...you would hope all of that torque would leave an impression.
I don't think even the savants at Ford exhaust development could make a V10 sound good based on what I've heard from Vipers. I just don't like it...
I don't think even the savants at Ford exhaust development could make a V10 sound good based on what I've heard from Vipers. I just don't like it...
Watch this then report back.
get the vol ready!
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Re: Is Lightning Back On??
Originally Posted by guesswhoo
Would have sold my soul if they would have made this car a production item! I loved just like the mule was set up, silver paint 18's and kick *** V10!
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 854
From: neverneverland
Re: Is Lightning Back On??
Originally Posted by guesswhoo
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Re: Is Lightning Back On??
As in Ford GT? The GT is/was a limited production car. Ford had a limited window of oppertunity to produce the car due to regs but supposedly the car will not pass future safety standards, ergo an end to production.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Doug Harden
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
55
May 15, 2003 12:08 PM
94LightningGal
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
11
Jul 17, 2002 09:41 PM
ced8
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
0
Jul 8, 2002 11:03 AM
94LightningGal
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
25
Jun 18, 2002 10:47 PM
