LaCrosse Super?
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Re: LaCrosse Super?
Originally Posted by dav305z
GM needs to start thinking "why" as opposed to "why not" when coming up with new models. Sure, the LaCrosse Super is easy, given that the Impala SS and GP GXP have the mechanics, but why does Buick need it when Pontiac is in the same showroom.
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Re: LaCrosse Super?
I'm not a Buick target customer. I probally never will be. I perfer cars that not only have alot of power, but have that fun to drive factor that soft smooth riding cars will never have. I can see myself in a used BMW M3 (I think new ones are overpriced). When I'm 65 I can see myself in a Chrysler 300C or SRT8. But I'm not Buick's target market, nor do I think I ever will be. Not to worry, outside of the previous IS300, I'll probally never be a Lexus customer either (more of an Infinity type of guy 
).
That being said, I think anything Buick does to get a pulse in their lineup is great news. While Cadillac is off chasing the "World Standard" of BMW and Mercedes, I see Buick as a Chrysler & Lincoln level vehicle line. Both have a far greater coolness factor than Buick.
I'm not sure about this "Ultra" moniker though. I'd reccomend "GN" or even at the risk of peeving some enthusiasts, "GNX" instead.
But again, like I said, I'm not the person who's likely to be a Buick buyer.
). That being said, I think anything Buick does to get a pulse in their lineup is great news. While Cadillac is off chasing the "World Standard" of BMW and Mercedes, I see Buick as a Chrysler & Lincoln level vehicle line. Both have a far greater coolness factor than Buick.
I'm not sure about this "Ultra" moniker though. I'd reccomend "GN" or even at the risk of peeving some enthusiasts, "GNX" instead.
But again, like I said, I'm not the person who's likely to be a Buick buyer.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post