Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Just imagine if, just if, the Buick Grand National returned

Old Oct 31, 2003 | 11:15 AM
  #61  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by SageofKnight
Let me see here...

1. The TB 3.8L block was a simple 2-bolt Iron block. The 3800 S2 or S3 should be a STRONGER block because it's a 2-bolt + 2-crossbolt (4-bolt) block. Not even the Stage motors are cross bolted.

Interesting point.

For those that claim that the turbo 3.8 had a stronger bottom end than the current S/C 3800.....I'm still not clear on what specifically made them stronger.
Old Nov 1, 2003 | 05:31 AM
  #62  
KLee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 370
From: Honolulu, Hi USA
I loved the license plate holders that said,"I brake for Corvettes." Of course the Vette owners replaced the brake with "break."
Old Nov 2, 2003 | 03:21 PM
  #63  
GN1270's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 361
From: Connecticut
For those that claim that the turbo 3.8 had a stronger bottom end than the current S/C 3800.....I'm still not clear on what specifically made them stronger.
They are commonly referred to crank, rods and pistons. The Turbo Buicks had specific pistons developed through their diesel motor program (as I mentioned before) and had a specific crank with rolled fillets that were in the 4.1 NA motors and only in the Turbo 3.8's, both of which are no longer made. They would have to redesighn both parts for warranty reasons because GM knows that people don't leave performance cars stock, they know that numb nuts sometimes will put 87 octane in their boosted motors, etc..

I'm not up to date on 3800 motors because like most people, I know they are limited. Not sure the exact reasons, but unlike the TR's, there are not alot of 11 sec unopened 3800's out there and they made a ton more of the boosted 3800's than they did of the TR's. There are a ton of 3800 RWD Camaros out there, along with a ton of junkyard boosted 3800 motors. You would think that if it could be done, it would have been done. Look at what the guys have to do to get to the mid 13's in a boosted 3800. I had a friend with a GTX (pontiac) that did intake, cam ,heads, headers exhaust etc and still couldn't get into the 12's. In a RWD application it may have yeilded a mid to high 12, but with those mods in a GN you can be deep in the 11's.

Look at the Cobra motor. Bolt on a KB supercharger and some are in the 9's. GM should get off their asses and start making some bullet proof motors for their performance cars, especially if your going to boost them.
Old Nov 2, 2003 | 03:31 PM
  #64  
GN1270's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 361
From: Connecticut
The reason nobody in with a 3.8L Camaro has taken the engine to it's limits is because if they had the money they could have started with an LT1 or LS1. Who buys a 3.8 Camaro over their other choices with the actual plan on taking it to the 10s?
I guess you are not clearly seeing the meaning of this post and the reason for the GN at all. The LS1 bottom shortblock , stock can handle a max of about 600hp. The GN shortblock can handle a max of about 600hp , so where is the better starting point??? The point is you would have to make the motor (3800) at least as strong as the original GN motor which is just as strong as the LS!/LT1 motors. You have proven my point why the 3800 is a bad choice of motor for the new GN.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
G-BODYT56
Parts For Sale
6
Jan 14, 2022 11:14 PM
93 RedBird
Fuel and Ignition
4
Nov 15, 2015 08:24 AM
Z28ELECTRICIAN
New Member Introduction
2
Oct 19, 2015 06:36 AM
68camaroboltz
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
Oct 5, 2015 11:56 PM
Daluchman1974
Cars For Sale
1
Sep 11, 2015 06:12 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:18 AM.