Just imagine if, just if, the Buick Grand National returned
Originally posted by GN1270
So you are assuming that a 3800 can handle the boost and 600 hp levels???
So you are assuming that a 3800 can handle the boost and 600 hp levels???
Brandon
Uhh....yes, it can handle that type of power. The fastest FWD Grand Prix to date (with a 3800 S/C Engine) has turned a 10 sec 1/4 mile. That's enough to put a few of you LT1's and LS1's to shame
In a previous post, someone mentioned Intense-racing.com
Here's a Turbo'd 3800 that's run as quick as 10.998.
http://www.intense-racing.com/GTP/TurboGP.html
Here's a Turbo'd 3800 that's run as quick as 10.998.
http://www.intense-racing.com/GTP/TurboGP.html
Originally posted by blkformula94
In a previous post, someone mentioned Intense-racing.com
Here's a Turbo'd 3800 that's run as quick as 10.998.
http://www.intense-racing.com/GTP/TurboGP.html
In a previous post, someone mentioned Intense-racing.com
Here's a Turbo'd 3800 that's run as quick as 10.998.
http://www.intense-racing.com/GTP/TurboGP.html
Originally posted by blkformula94
In a previous post, someone mentioned Intense-racing.com
Here's a Turbo'd 3800 that's run as quick as 10.998.
http://www.intense-racing.com/GTP/TurboGP.html
In a previous post, someone mentioned Intense-racing.com
Here's a Turbo'd 3800 that's run as quick as 10.998.
http://www.intense-racing.com/GTP/TurboGP.html
But it's like GN1270 said. That engine has no stock parts.
My friends GN has the stock block,rods,crank,heads,lower intake, and exhaust manifolds.
His best time was a 10.96 at 125 mph.
Obviously he has done other stuff to the car, but the fact remains that he is going this fast with pretty much just bolt-ons.
Is a 3800 going this fast with just a few bolt ons?
Originally posted by GN1270
Now take into account that the GNX ran on 2 less #'s of boost
Now take into account that the GNX ran on 2 less #'s of boost
Last edited by TT/A1233; Oct 29, 2003 at 03:58 PM.
Not true. The GNX was turned up to 15 lbs of boost with an added adjustable wastegate by McLaren with a recalibrated ECM to handle the added boost.
You don't need an adjustable wastegate to get more boost and the computer automatically calibrates for more boost on all TR's, but the GNX did have a more aggressive program than both the TTA and the GN that accounted for the main reason why the GNX is faster and as fast as the lighter, more boost, more aerodynamic TTA.
Originally posted by HuJass
But it's like GN1270 said. That engine has no stock parts.
But it's like GN1270 said. That engine has no stock parts.
It'd be more akin to the Stage 2 blocks for the 3.8's.
Originally posted by blkformula94
You guys are right. The block is a racing block by Intense.
It'd be more akin to the Stage 2 blocks for the 3.8's.
You guys are right. The block is a racing block by Intense.
It'd be more akin to the Stage 2 blocks for the 3.8's.
Maybe the 3900 will be a stouter block. But will there be any RWD applications for it?
A boosted version of the new V6 in the CTS would make a nice GN too... again if the block is heavy duty for handling massive hp increases.
GM really needs to RACE these engines to show their full out capability. The Buick turbo V6 was racing in Indy many moons ago. The Ecotech is a prime example of a production GM motor capable of handling high hp in racing apps.
Let me see here...
1. The TB 3.8L block was a simple 2-bolt Iron block. The 3800 S2 or S3 should be a STRONGER block because it's a 2-bolt + 2-crossbolt (4-bolt) block. Not even the Stage motors are cross bolted.
2. The reason nobody in with a 3.8L Camaro has taken the engine to it's limits is because if they had the money they could have started with an LT1 or LS1. Who buys a 3.8 Camaro over their other choices with the actual plan on taking it to the 10s?
3. The 3800SC in a RWD sedan could be an easy 13 or even 12 sec car. The FWD version already can hit 13s with basicly a pulley.
1. The TB 3.8L block was a simple 2-bolt Iron block. The 3800 S2 or S3 should be a STRONGER block because it's a 2-bolt + 2-crossbolt (4-bolt) block. Not even the Stage motors are cross bolted.
2. The reason nobody in with a 3.8L Camaro has taken the engine to it's limits is because if they had the money they could have started with an LT1 or LS1. Who buys a 3.8 Camaro over their other choices with the actual plan on taking it to the 10s?
3. The 3800SC in a RWD sedan could be an easy 13 or even 12 sec car. The FWD version already can hit 13s with basicly a pulley.
Originally posted by GN1270
OK 1 less # of boost which equates to 10hp but why still, doesnt the TTA beat it????
You don't need an adjustable wastegate to get more boost and the computer automatically calibrates for more boost on all TR's, but the GNX did have a more aggressive program than both the TTA and the GN that accounted for the main reason why the GNX is faster and as fast as the lighter, more boost, more aerodynamic TTA.
OK 1 less # of boost which equates to 10hp but why still, doesnt the TTA beat it????
You don't need an adjustable wastegate to get more boost and the computer automatically calibrates for more boost on all TR's, but the GNX did have a more aggressive program than both the TTA and the GN that accounted for the main reason why the GNX is faster and as fast as the lighter, more boost, more aerodynamic TTA.
Quicker ? Fastest quarter mile time I have heard or seen was 13.4 for a GNX which is about the same for most run of the mill TTA's. Quite a few TTA's have seen bottom 13's and a handfull have run 12.9's bone stock.
Still kudos to the GNX as until the BMW M5 came out, it was the
quickest luxury sedan made.



.