Just drove a Charger SRT-8...Pontiac NEEDS a car like this...
I don't think an SRT-8 Charger weighs quite 4,200 lbs, but when a car weighs that much, what's the difference 
I agree the GTO is a nicer interior, and is definitely a more involving car to drive, which is normally my top priority in preferring a car. The Charger simply feels more bad ***...I can't explain it. I just know if I had a family and couldn't have a Camaro, the choice is clear
However, given that scenario, I really want a Pontiac instead!!!!

I agree the GTO is a nicer interior, and is definitely a more involving car to drive, which is normally my top priority in preferring a car. The Charger simply feels more bad ***...I can't explain it. I just know if I had a family and couldn't have a Camaro, the choice is clear

However, given that scenario, I really want a Pontiac instead!!!!
It's odd you compared it with a CompG Prix, when the GXP is a much more accurate comparison. I have a feeling the GXP stacks up a lot better against the various Charger variants, especially in four-season locales.
I only compared it to a Comp G because, as I said in the opening post, I OWN ONE. I haven't driven a GXP in about 9 months, whereas I drive a Comp G a couple days a week.
You cannot even begin to understand the SRT experience by driving an RT. It isn't even close. It is, in a way, like comparing a Comp G to a GXP. Indeed, quite some time ago I wrote a post on here of a comparison I did between a GXP and an RT....IMO, the GXP eats an RT for overall experience, performance and value.
But I'm talking about performance and cost that is significantly greater than a GXP. An SRT-8 completely trumps a GXP in every measurable number, and obviously cost. The "feeling bad ***" comment you disagree with simply is not there in an RT...not even close.
If you drove it, you'd possibly see what I mean...
You cannot even begin to understand the SRT experience by driving an RT. It isn't even close. It is, in a way, like comparing a Comp G to a GXP. Indeed, quite some time ago I wrote a post on here of a comparison I did between a GXP and an RT....IMO, the GXP eats an RT for overall experience, performance and value.
But I'm talking about performance and cost that is significantly greater than a GXP. An SRT-8 completely trumps a GXP in every measurable number, and obviously cost. The "feeling bad ***" comment you disagree with simply is not there in an RT...not even close.
If you drove it, you'd possibly see what I mean...
I did a lot of driving of SRT8 Chargers as part of my job, and while I like the acceleration, stability control and comfort, the car feels like a cow in terms of dynamics. There's very little body movement either for cornering or for acceleration so you don't really feel like you're driving a responsive car. I also don't care for the deadening of the sound - you can only hear the exhaust growl when you step on the car and you can't feel any vibration in the cabin at all. Granted, that makes it comfy, but c'mon, if you want a sports car you want to feel those things. My wife and I *LOVE* the fact that my WS6 vibrates slightly in the cabin (it did from day one). And even her Z has a mean sounding exhaust at idle. These are the fun things that remind you that you're driving a sports car even when you're sitting in traffic. Charger doesn't have any of that at all. And I have to say, at no point did the Charger scare me a little - it was all SO controlled. My WS6 (when I first got it) scared me - that's what *I* want.
In the end, again, I hope Pontiac can make a bad *** 4 door like this car. A GXP trumps an RT, but doesn't give anywhere near the thrill of an SRT-8.
A GXP is priced similarly to a Charger R/T. The SRT-8 cars are really in a slightly different league, and they are priced accordingly.
I did a lot of driving of SRT8 Chargers as part of my job, and while I like the acceleration, stability control and comfort, the car feels like a cow in terms of dynamics. There's very little body movement either for cornering or for acceleration so you don't really feel like you're driving a responsive car. I also don't care for the deadening of the sound - you can only hear the exhaust growl when you step on the car and you can't feel any vibration in the cabin at all. Granted, that makes it comfy, but c'mon, if you want a sports car you want to feel those things. My wife and I *LOVE* the fact that my WS6 vibrates slightly in the cabin (it did from day one). And even her Z has a mean sounding exhaust at idle. These are the fun things that remind you that you're driving a sports car even when you're sitting in traffic. Charger doesn't have any of that at all. And I have to say, at no point did the Charger scare me a little - it was all SO controlled. My WS6 (when I first got it) scared me - that's what *I* want.
You're the 1st person I've known to use a Z28 and WS6 as a yardstick to measure a fulls size sports sedan, let alone being the 1st person I've ever known to slam a car because it doesn't shake or vibrate.
Last edited by guionM; Jan 16, 2007 at 12:41 PM.
I don't think an SRT-8 Charger weighs quite 4,200 lbs, but when a car weighs that much, what's the difference 
I agree the GTO is a nicer interior, and is definitely a more involving car to drive, which is normally my top priority in preferring a car. The Charger simply feels more bad ***...I can't explain it. I just know if I had a family and couldn't have a Camaro, the choice is clear
However, given that scenario, I really want a Pontiac instead!!!!

I agree the GTO is a nicer interior, and is definitely a more involving car to drive, which is normally my top priority in preferring a car. The Charger simply feels more bad ***...I can't explain it. I just know if I had a family and couldn't have a Camaro, the choice is clear

However, given that scenario, I really want a Pontiac instead!!!!
It comes in at 4160 lbs.
I don't think an SRT-8 Charger weighs quite 4,200 lbs, but when a car weighs that much, what's the difference 
I agree the GTO is a nicer interior, and is definitely a more involving car to drive, which is normally my top priority in preferring a car. The Charger simply feels more bad ***...I can't explain it. I just know if I had a family and couldn't have a Camaro, the choice is clear
However, given that scenario, I really want a Pontiac instead!!!!

I agree the GTO is a nicer interior, and is definitely a more involving car to drive, which is normally my top priority in preferring a car. The Charger simply feels more bad ***...I can't explain it. I just know if I had a family and couldn't have a Camaro, the choice is clear

However, given that scenario, I really want a Pontiac instead!!!!
I'm not much impressed with the Charger's "feeling bad A**". While I did not drive an SRT8 (just a regular Hemi), I came away from my Hemi test-drive underwhelmed by the Charger's extreme torque mgmt during shifts, it's too-chopped side windows, its kangaroo-hip quarter panels and its milk-jug plastic spoiler. That said - the Charger (in all its forms) is undeniably a hit for DaimlerCX and is making a lot of buyers happy.
It's odd you compared it with a CompG Prix, when the GXP is a much more accurate comparison. I have a feeling the GXP stacks up a lot better against the various Charger variants, especially in four-season locales.
It's odd you compared it with a CompG Prix, when the GXP is a much more accurate comparison. I have a feeling the GXP stacks up a lot better against the various Charger variants, especially in four-season locales.
DCX has TSBs out to reflash the tranny and TCM. It made a HUGE differnce on my SRT8. The difference between the RT and SRT8 is quiet pronounced. The SRT8 flat hauls. I can't wait to go to the SRT8 experience.
Dude........ We're talking about a large, 4 door, somewhat luxurious, muscle sedan... not a sports car........ and definately not a pony car.
You're the 1st person I've known to use a Z28 and WS6 as a yardstick to measure a fulls size sports sedan, let alone being the 1st person I've ever known to slam a car because it doesn't shake or vibrate.
You're the 1st person I've known to use a Z28 and WS6 as a yardstick to measure a fulls size sports sedan, let alone being the 1st person I've ever known to slam a car because it doesn't shake or vibrate.

From the reports I've read, it sounds like the 6.1L Hemi is underrated maybe its closer to 450hp than 425hp?
Your first drive of a SRT8 reminded me of my first drive of a 1994 Impala SS back when the Impala SS first come out. The whale that the B-body was felt so light on its feet with the LT1,sports suspension, and 17" sticky tires. It doesn't sound like much now, but back in '94 a 260hp sedan at $24K that went 0 to 60 in 6.5 sec and topped out close to 150 mph was unheard of, and 17" wheels on a sedan was unheard of too.
Can't wait for GM to get back into the performance RWD sedan market again.
Your first drive of a SRT8 reminded me of my first drive of a 1994 Impala SS back when the Impala SS first come out. The whale that the B-body was felt so light on its feet with the LT1,sports suspension, and 17" sticky tires. It doesn't sound like much now, but back in '94 a 260hp sedan at $24K that went 0 to 60 in 6.5 sec and topped out close to 150 mph was unheard of, and 17" wheels on a sedan was unheard of too.
Can't wait for GM to get back into the performance RWD sedan market again.
And of course, the Aura hardly leads its class in performance. We live in a world of 280 hp Camry's. Remember when Corvettes had less power?
Very true. I've been driving our family's Saturn Aura XR, and it really is amazing how far progress has marched. My 2000 GTP was really king of the hill in its day. If you read some reviews from 1997, the writers were all left dumbfounded and speechless by its ferocious acceleration, its unsedan-like handling, and its go fast styling. The Aura makes my GTP feel like it's riding on leaf springs, and sucking hot air. The mighty L67 engine is outclassed and outmuscled by the 3.6L, which quite insultingly, never even sounds like it's working hard.
And of course, the Aura hardly leads its class in performance. We live in a world of 280 hp Camry's. Remember when Corvettes had less power?
And of course, the Aura hardly leads its class in performance. We live in a world of 280 hp Camry's. Remember when Corvettes had less power?
Dude........ We're talking about a large, 4 door, somewhat luxurious, muscle sedan... not a sports car........ and definately not a pony car.
You're the 1st person I've known to use a Z28 and WS6 as a yardstick to measure a fulls size sports sedan, let alone being the 1st person I've ever known to slam a car because it doesn't shake or vibrate.
You're the 1st person I've known to use a Z28 and WS6 as a yardstick to measure a fulls size sports sedan, let alone being the 1st person I've ever known to slam a car because it doesn't shake or vibrate.

I guess I just don't understand the segment, then. Charger (initially at least) was described by Chrysler as being the return of their muscle car. When it came out and was more of a sedan, they backed off of that. The Charger initially was supposed to be more of a sportier car, since the 300C was the sedan in the lineup - they even described it as a 4-door muscle car. It's not that, IMHO.
Also, per the SRT group's charter (or name) they are supposed to embody performance vehicles. When I drive a Charger SRT8, I don't feel like I'm driving a performance vehicle. When I just RIDE in a BMW sedan, I feel like I'm in a performance vehicle. There's a way to do a sporty sedan and BMW is far more the benchmark than Charger. To me that's what Pontiac needs to shoot for. And FWIW, a BMW sedan has a LOT more in common with my WS6 and my wife's 350z in terms of feel and fun than it does with a Charger - vibration, shake, noise and all.
Muscle sedan? First I've ever heard the phrase.......and it feels.....wrong.
I guess I just don't understand the segment, then. Charger (initially at least) was described by Chrysler as being the return of their muscle car. When it came out and was more of a sedan, they backed off of that. The Charger initially was supposed to be more of a sportier car, since the 300C was the sedan in the lineup - they even described it as a 4-door muscle car. It's not that, IMHO.
Also, per the SRT group's charter (or name) they are supposed to embody performance vehicles. When I drive a Charger SRT8, I don't feel like I'm driving a performance vehicle. When I just RIDE in a BMW sedan, I feel like I'm in a performance vehicle. There's a way to do a sporty sedan and BMW is far more the benchmark than Charger. To me that's what Pontiac needs to shoot for. And FWIW, a BMW sedan has a LOT more in common with my WS6 and my wife's 350z in terms of feel and fun than it does with a Charger - vibration, shake, noise and all.
I guess I just don't understand the segment, then. Charger (initially at least) was described by Chrysler as being the return of their muscle car. When it came out and was more of a sedan, they backed off of that. The Charger initially was supposed to be more of a sportier car, since the 300C was the sedan in the lineup - they even described it as a 4-door muscle car. It's not that, IMHO.
Also, per the SRT group's charter (or name) they are supposed to embody performance vehicles. When I drive a Charger SRT8, I don't feel like I'm driving a performance vehicle. When I just RIDE in a BMW sedan, I feel like I'm in a performance vehicle. There's a way to do a sporty sedan and BMW is far more the benchmark than Charger. To me that's what Pontiac needs to shoot for. And FWIW, a BMW sedan has a LOT more in common with my WS6 and my wife's 350z in terms of feel and fun than it does with a Charger - vibration, shake, noise and all.
What?! Are you talking about an old 2002i sedan or something? 
BMWs are known for being very refined but communicative driving machines. They are not crude, brutish fast cars like the F-cars were (relatively speaking). I've not driven an SRT8 yet, but I've driven a few BMWs and several different F cars, and the BMWs did not feel like F cars. Maybe in terms of quick steering or something, but the overall feel/ambience of the car is much different.
I'm not quite following you here.
People plunking down $40k for a muscular sedan do not want some unrefined beast like something out of the sixties that has been modified with a big cam, headers, etc. They want to have their cake and eat it too. That means they want the refinement that is expected of a modern vehicle, but with throw you in the seat acceleration, good handling, braking, etc. Most reviews I've seen of the SRT8 cars really praise the sound effects of that 6.1L Hemi. Sure, it is probably muted just a bit to keep some level of refinement there, but the music is apparently pretty nice. Which is also how it is in a BMW, by the way...
What?! Are you talking about an old 2002i sedan or something? 
BMWs are known for being very refined but communicative driving machines. They are not crude, brutish fast cars like the F-cars were (relatively speaking). I've not driven an SRT8 yet, but I've driven a few BMWs and several different F cars, and the BMWs did not feel like F cars. Maybe in terms of quick steering or something, but the overall feel/ambience of the car is much different.
I'm not quite following you here.
People plunking down $40k for a muscular sedan do not want some unrefined beast like something out of the sixties that has been modified with a big cam, headers, etc. They want to have their cake and eat it too. That means they want the refinement that is expected of a modern vehicle, but with throw you in the seat acceleration, good handling, braking, etc. Most reviews I've seen of the SRT8 cars really praise the sound effects of that 6.1L Hemi. Sure, it is probably muted just a bit to keep some level of refinement there, but the music is apparently pretty nice. Which is also how it is in a BMW, by the way...



