Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Jeep Trailhawk

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 10:40 AM
  #16  
Caps94ZODG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,748
From: New England
I hope its more than an exercise
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 10:52 AM
  #17  
georgejetson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 689
Originally Posted by Sixer-Bird
I'd assume this is only a stying exercise. Based on what I read on this board, the last thing DCX needs is yet another SUV.
Um, it's Jeep. You think they should have a musclecar, maybe?
Old Jan 1, 2007 | 11:29 AM
  #18  
OutsiderIROC-Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,688
From: Middle of Kansas
I kinda like it.
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 12:38 PM
  #19  
Sixer-Bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,215
From: Coppell, Texas
Originally Posted by georgejetson
Um, it's Jeep. You think they should have a musclecar, maybe?
Absolutely not. I'm looking at the big picture for DCX, which seems to be a problem with product overlap. I know that Jeep's product line is limited to SUV's/trucks. I'm not a "must be a RWD V8 or it sucks" person.
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 01:46 PM
  #20  
georgejetson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 689
Originally Posted by Sixer-Bird
Absolutely not. I'm looking at the big picture for DCX, which seems to be a problem with product overlap. I know that Jeep's product line is limited to SUV's/trucks. I'm not a "must be a RWD V8 or it sucks" person.
There is talk on the Mopar boards that the Jeep Commander and Chrysler Aspen are going to go away after another year, with possibly more changes to come. Lot of rethinking going on in Auburn Hills at the moment.
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 02:18 PM
  #21  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
I think what Jeep really needs next is a pickup. They already have 6 SUVs
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 02:25 PM
  #22  
km9v's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,296
From: Beaumont, TX
It looks like a smashed cherokee.
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 03:06 PM
  #23  
guionM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by georgejetson
There is talk on the Mopar boards that the Jeep Commander and Chrysler Aspen are going to go away after another year, with possibly more changes to come. Lot of rethinking going on in Auburn Hills at the moment.
Personally, I feel Aspen is the most ill-concieved vehicle (let alone SUV) in recent history.

The purpose of the Aspen was to compete in the luxury Ute market with Escalade, Navigator, and many of the foreign brands, but cost less. But the reason these brands are successful is because they ARE somewhat exclusive, looks great or at least unique, and has status.

Taking a second string SUV like the Dakota was a bad move. Lincoln tried that with the Aviator in using the Explorer, and it tanked. That killed any idea GM had for a "Baby Escalade". Then not investing any money into the sheetmetal on an already questionable design was silly. The 300 is a design that expresses confidence, and is almost in your face. It doesn't even look like other LXs.

If the Aspen at least had the Jeep Commander's body, it would have had a fighting chance. But while I could see even the failed Lincoln Aviator as being pretty cool, the Aspen is at the least tacky, and at most goofy.

In either case, it's nowhere near the league it's suppose to be running with... regardless of the price.
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 03:32 PM
  #24  
georgejetson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 689
Originally Posted by guionM
Personally, I feel Aspen is the most ill-concieved vehicle (let alone SUV) in recent history.
It would certainly be in my top five.

The Commander was an interesting idea idea -- a three-row Jeep -- that wasn't as well executed as it could have been, for reasons that aren't clear to me. I wouldn't mind seeing them give it one more try.
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 08:42 PM
  #25  
Sixer-Bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,215
From: Coppell, Texas
DCX seems to have gotten a little off track with some of their recent products. The Aspen, Commander, and Compass are not very well thought out, by DCX's standards.
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 09:21 PM
  #26  
flowmotion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,502
Aspen is obviously of those knee-jerk "brand jobs" just to keep the plant capacity up -- Nobody blinked an eye when Detroit did this 10 years ago. But the "Poor Man's Escalade" advertising is just

But I dislike the new Dakota so much, if I had to choose, I'd probably take the Aspen. Sorry.

Hopefully this concept indicates that Jeep is getting back to their offroad/sport image and away from the people-movers.
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 07:48 AM
  #27  
2K1SunsetSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 649
From: Clinton TWP, MI
I like it. With a diesel I wonder what the towing capacity will be?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Jul 17, 2015 02:47 PM
BLK1997Z28
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
0
May 2, 2015 01:26 PM
titanthomas
LT1 Based Engine Tech
6
Apr 18, 2015 11:44 PM
aj2494
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
7
Mar 12, 2015 10:17 PM
jp2002ls1
Midwest
0
Oct 27, 2002 10:29 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.