Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

If you thought Ford was bad- Chrysler vehicle sales down 36%

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 02:52 PM
  #1  
johnsocal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,911
From: Southern California (SoCal)
If you thought Ford was bad- Chrysler vehicle sales down 36%

Chrysler vehicle sales down 36%, worse than expected.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/stor...%7D&dist=msr_3

Chrysler June U.S. sales slump 36% to 117,457 units

By Sue Chang
Last update: 3:24 p.m. EDT July 1, 2008Comments: 12
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Chrysler LLC on Tuesday reported a 36% decline in June U.S. sales to 117,457 vehicles from 183,347 in June 2007. June sales reflect a continued contraction of the market for pickup trucks and sports utility vehicles, and increases in highly fuel-efficient vehicles, the car maker said. Nonetheless, car sales led the slump, falling 49% to 29,858 vehicles while trucks slid 30% to 87,599.

Last edited by johnsocal; Jul 1, 2008 at 03:47 PM.
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 05:40 PM
  #2  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
49% drop in car sales? HOLLLY WOW!!
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 05:54 PM
  #3  
cjmatt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 983
From: Motor City
yup, chryslers ****ed
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 06:39 PM
  #4  
Eric Bryant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,400
From: Michigan's left coast
Only 29,800 cars last month? Wow - there are some individual models from other automakers (like the Honda Civic) that are selling better than all of Chrysler's car lineup.

Or, put another way, it was only a couple years ago that Chrysler was building 20,000 LX cars per month.

Last edited by Eric Bryant; Jul 1, 2008 at 06:44 PM.
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 07:08 PM
  #5  
Chrome383Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,043
From: Shelbyville, IN
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
Only 29,800 cars last month? Wow - there are some individual models from other automakers (like the Honda Civic) that are selling better than all of Chrysler's car lineup.

Or, put another way, it was only a couple years ago that Chrysler was building 20,000 LX cars per month.
Maybe GM's idea to shelf the RWD Impala will actually turn out to be a good idea...
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 11:08 PM
  #6  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Jeez, how are Toyota and Honda doing in comparison?
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 11:43 PM
  #7  
dav305z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 757
Originally Posted by Chrome383Z
Maybe GM's idea to shelf the RWD Impala will actually turn out to be a good idea...
Check that. It turned out to be a great idea. In fact, GM management should get some kudos for burning the midnight oil to get their car lineup in shape over the past three years. Just imagine how bad the company would be doing right now without cars like the Malibu or Cobalt. They'd be totally f*cked (pardon my French).
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 12:17 AM
  #8  
cjmatt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 983
From: Motor City
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
Only 29,800 cars last month? Wow - there are some individual models from other automakers (like the Honda Civic) that are selling better than all of Chrysler's car lineup.

Or, put another way, it was only a couple years ago that Chrysler was building 20,000 LX cars per month.
LX sales are stagnant because the LX is stagnant...it is now a 5 year old design, everyone that wanted one already has one...
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 07:30 AM
  #9  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Originally Posted by bossco
Jeez, how are Toyota and Honda doing in comparison?
Toyota fell more than GM did this month from what I saw on autospies, I would post the article but the troll population there is high enough to make your blood boil.
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 07:41 AM
  #10  
Eric Bryant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,400
From: Michigan's left coast
Originally Posted by cjmatt
LX sales are stagnant because the LX is stagnant...it is now a 5 year old design, everyone that wanted one already has one...
Wanna know the sad thing about the LX? The 300C actually received a fairly substantial make-over for 2008. Did anyone notice? Judging by the folks in this forum and the general reaction of customers, I'd say that it was not a successful MCE.
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 11:32 AM
  #11  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
Wanna know the sad thing about the LX? The 300C actually received a fairly substantial make-over for 2008. Did anyone notice? Judging by the folks in this forum and the general reaction of customers, I'd say that it was not a successful MCE.
Yep. Better interior and a new trunk with a mini-spoiler built in. Unless you have a 2007 and 2008 300 side by side it's almost impossible to notice, so, you're right, the 300's MCE was all but a waste of money (save the interior, which actually is very good).

Originally Posted by cjmatt
LX sales are stagnant because the LX is stagnant...it is now a 5 year old design, everyone that wanted one already has one...
Yes, you're right also.

When you get a car like the 300 that comes onto the car scene and is a huge hit with high sales numbers, you can't simply let the car whither on the vine. It doesn't take long for the market to get saturated and you need a new design. I was told Chrysler planned a 4-5 year model cycle for the 300 beck when it came out, but the car still is here. Looks the same, and will continue to look the same for at least another 2-3 years.

8 years for a single sedan design is a bit long in tooth.

Last edited by guionM; Jul 2, 2008 at 11:37 AM.
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 04:54 PM
  #12  
94LightningGal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,178
From: Payson, AZ USA
A bit??? LOL
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 05:07 PM
  #13  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
Originally Posted by guionM
(save the interior, which actually is very good).
what exactly is different? i just looked and it looks EXACTLY the same.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DirtyDaveW
Forced Induction
13
Dec 1, 2016 05:37 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Jan 23, 2015 01:13 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Dec 3, 2014 12:30 PM
z28projects4ever
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
9
Jul 16, 2002 07:48 PM
guionM
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
14
Jun 19, 2002 08:30 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 AM.