Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

If GM does this, I lose all respect for GM....

Old Oct 23, 2008 | 09:05 PM
  #166  
Chuck!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,610
From: Cincinnati, OH
Wait so you're saying that the side that approved the Enclave

and the Outlook

and the Arcadia

and the Traverse

is flawed?
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 09:42 PM
  #167  
flowmotion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,502
Originally Posted by guionM
Today, GM can create a all new car quicker than they can get it approved.
This is incredibly damning.

Originally Posted by Chuck!
Wait so you're saying that the side that approved the Enclave

and the Outlook

and the Arcadia

and the Traverse

is flawed?
4 Minivans + 4 SUVs = 4 Crossovers, DUH. Nevermind brand positioning or opportunity cost or anything else, just keep on building what you've always been building. (And next thing you know 30 year old nameplates like Grand Prix and Monte Carlo are dying off....)

The upshot I see is that GM is incredibly conservative -- they never make a car unless someone else has made it first. That means they're late into every segment. Late into Minivans, late into SUVs, late into Sport Luxury, late into muscle cars, late into crossovers, and now late into small cars.
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 10:03 PM
  #168  
HuJass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,224
From: CNY
If they keep up their way of doing business, they won't be late to being dead.
Old Oct 23, 2008 | 10:21 PM
  #169  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Too messy!

Please GM, walk away, NOW. You might get another chance with Ford if you just ignore the perils in dealing with a dying car company and a ruthless bank.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 01:15 AM
  #170  
GTOJack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 976
From: SE MI
GM isnt taking too kindly to GMACs strong arming and is now nationaly advertising that hundreds of banks are waiting to approve loans, and that no money down loans are still available to those with excellent credit. GM is also offering $250 to dealers for each vehicle that is sold and financed through someone other than GMAC. Dealers are finding it difficult to obtain new vehicle floor plan financing from banks.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 01:27 AM
  #171  
94LightningGal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,178
From: Payson, AZ USA
Guy............. do you read it like I do?? Basically, that GM is just doing what GM does, figuring that if they get in bad enough shape, that we will bail them out???

Basically, do they still think of themselves as all powerful and knowing???

I find what GM is doing, and not doing, to be particularly troubling. We are all furious over the bailouts for the banks and financial institutions.......... will we be as furious if GM gets their bailout also (a true bailout, not the little loan thing with conditions). This then begs the question, if GM does indeed get bailed out.............. why not Ford and Chrysler also.

When 9/11 killed our business, noone bailed us out............. or even cared. We are still paying for it. I guess we will also get to pay for GM's inability to change their corporate culture.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 07:56 AM
  #172  
onebadponcho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 954
From: Shelton, WA
Originally Posted by 94LightningGal
Guy............. do you read it like I do?? Basically, that GM is just doing what GM does, figuring that if they get in bad enough shape, that we will bail them out???

Basically, do they still think of themselves as all powerful and knowing???

I find what GM is doing, and not doing, to be particularly troubling. We are all furious over the bailouts for the banks and financial institutions.......... will we be as furious if GM gets their bailout also (a true bailout, not the little loan thing with conditions). This then begs the question, if GM does indeed get bailed out.............. why not Ford and Chrysler also.

When 9/11 killed our business, noone bailed us out............. or even cared. We are still paying for it. I guess we will also get to pay for GM's inability to change their corporate culture.
It seems like that's what GM is doing. They must be "banking" on the idea that they're "too big to fail" and the government (meaning taxpayers) will bail them out. No matter how many would be against it, the precedent has already been set with the approved bailouts of insurance companies/banks/financial institutions, which has all these fat cats in a line panhandling for our tax money. I say screw 'em all.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 08:36 AM
  #173  
anasazi's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,604
From: Milton, FL
will going chapter 11 be enough to restructure the corporate bureaucracy or is there really no way to fix it?
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 11:45 AM
  #174  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
The government bailed out Chrysler in 1979, and they'll do it again if they have to. There's no way they let Detroit fail under any circumstance.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 12:08 PM
  #175  
PacerX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
Wow.

There's a whole bunch of delusional ranting in here.

Now, for some reality:

25% of Chrysler's white collar workforce is going to be eliminated.

GM is letting go of 5000 white collar folks.

The blue collar folks are going to get hammered also. The plant closings are going to accelerate.


Chrysler is dead. It's just a matter of time now. Not even bankruptcy can save them.


GM and Ford are in their death throes. The idea that Ford is somehow actually better off in this mess is absolutely laughable.

Dead is dead - and they're both going to be dead, and soon, without intervention or bankruptcy.

The ONLY way for GM to shed dealers and then brands is going to be bankruptcy because of franchise laws.



Chevrolet and Cadillac need to be the only two divisions that survive. They alone can cover the entire market.

Last edited by PacerX; Oct 24, 2008 at 12:15 PM.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 12:17 PM
  #176  
jrp4uc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,724
From: Hebron, KY
Originally Posted by PacerX
25% of Chrysler's white collar workforce is going to be eliminated.
http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl...5/1023/CARNEWS

Chrysler plans to cut 25% of salaried jobs
By PHILIP NUSSEL, AUTOMOTIVE NEWS Chrysler LLC said on Friday it plans to cut 25 percent of its salaried work force beginning next month.

A statement sent to employees did not specify how many jobs were being cut. But spokesman Michael Palese said that, according to the most recent figures available--from September 2007--Chrysler has 18,529 salaried workers. That would mean 4,632 jobs.

The cuts will take the form of voluntary retirements, buyout programs and layoffs, Chrysler said. Chrysler said the buyout programs would include “enhanced benefits,” including cash and new-vehicle vouchers.

The company also told employees it would “cut back on all discretionary and overhead expenses and reduce capital expenditures not connected to major product programs.”

Chrysler, according to numerous reports, is in the midst of negotiating a possible sale to General Motors. It also has been engaged in discussions with Nissan and Renault about a possible partnership arrangement, according to the reports.

CEO Bob Nardelli said in the statement to employees: “These are truly unimaginable times for our industry. We continue to be in the most difficult economic period most of us can remember.

“The combination of troubled financial markets, difficult credit, volatile commodity prices, the housing crisis and declining consumer confidence continues to weigh on the economy. Never before have auto industry sales contracted at such a fast rate. Throughout this challenging time for our industry and our company, we have continued to face the realities of our business environment and, working as a team, we have been right-sizing our organization to become as competitive as possible.”

Chrissie Thompson contributed to this report

This article was last updated on: 10/24/08, 11:30 et
I'm not of the opinion that Chrysler is being taken advantage of in this merger/dismantling either. This isn't a pretty situation for any of the domestic manufactuers.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 12:52 PM
  #177  
onebadponcho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 954
From: Shelton, WA
Originally Posted by PacerX
Chevrolet and Cadillac need to be the only two divisions that survive. They alone can cover the entire market.
QFT.

Also, my delusional, naive @$$ still believes GM/Ford/Chrysler can still survive. Obviously they all need to drastically downsize to meet the drastically decreasing market demand, but I don't think any of them need to completely close shop.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 01:09 PM
  #178  
PacerX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
Originally Posted by onebadponcho
QFT.

Also, my delusional, naive @$$ still believes GM/Ford/Chrysler can still survive. Obviously they all need to drastically downsize to meet the drastically decreasing market demand, but I don't think any of them need to completely close shop.
Oh, don't get me wrong...

They can survive. But I do not see any way for it to happen without intervention or bankruptcy now.

And it has been (and will continue to be) a titanic struggle.

No matter how good of a vehicle we build right now (Silverado, Corvette, Malibu, CTS), we cannot get the Kool-Aid drinkers to wake up and smell the coffee.

We are flat-out kicking the **** out of EVERYBODY on the planet with those cars/trucks. They're better, period.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #179  
Maximum Bob's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 178
Originally Posted by jg95z28
The government bailed out Chrysler in 1979, and they'll do it again if they have to. There's no way they let Detroit fail under any circumstance.
That wasn't a bailout, it was a loan that Chrysler paid back in full with minivan & LH money.
Old Oct 24, 2008 | 01:19 PM
  #180  
onebadponcho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 954
From: Shelton, WA
Originally Posted by PacerX
No matter how good of a vehicle we build right now (Silverado, Corvette, Malibu, CTS), we cannot get the Kool-Aid drinkers to wake up and smell the coffee.
It sounds like the Big 3 needs to start selling Kool-Aid then instead of coffee.

Seriously, there was a time when foreign automakers had no marketshare compared to the Big 3 and look where we're at now. The tide turned once, it can happen again.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01 AM.