If 4th gen production continued....would anyone buy?
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by formula79:
but to me a 4th gen is leaps and bounds above a 3rd gen.
</font>
but to me a 4th gen is leaps and bounds above a 3rd gen.
</font>
....don't you mean hops and stumbles?

I think in many ways 4th gen proponants are shooting themselves in the foot.
Why?
In order to validate and reaffirm your beliefs in your 4th gen you argue that certain specific aspects of your new car..are better than someone elses old car.
The shadow of the 3rd gen looms large over the 4th gen...doesn't it?
I'd doubt that in 10-20 years people will argue which will be better 4th gen or 5th gen.
Why?
In order to validate and reaffirm your beliefs in your 4th gen you argue that certain specific aspects of your new car..are better than someone elses old car.
The shadow of the 3rd gen looms large over the 4th gen...doesn't it?
I'd doubt that in 10-20 years people will argue which will be better 4th gen or 5th gen.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Jim85IROC:
You're bench racing chief. For every 1 magazine article that puts the IROC's skidpad numbers at .85, I can find 5 that put it over .90. BFD. Magazine skidpad tests are just as useless as magazine 1/4 mile tests. LT1 1/4 mile times were all over the place in magazines because most of those ***** can't drive, and they make no allowances for external factors like weather, tires, etc. Go to an SCCA event or to some road racing events and see how they match up. You'll learn a lot more than you will from reading magazines.
Originally posted by Darth Xed:
OK, enough about the 3rd gen out-skidpadding the 4th gen
It's NOT true. Here's 2 artciles. One reviews the IROC-Z, another a 4th Gen:
IROC-Z: .85g on skidpad
4th GEN: .86 skidpad
http://www.iroc-z.com/articles/artic...ackarticle.htm
http://home.earthlink.net/~streetwiz...s/under30.html
Seriously, it's time to wake up from your 3rd gen wet dream...
</font>
OK, enough about the 3rd gen out-skidpadding the 4th gen
It's NOT true. Here's 2 artciles. One reviews the IROC-Z, another a 4th Gen:IROC-Z: .85g on skidpad
4th GEN: .86 skidpad
http://www.iroc-z.com/articles/artic...ackarticle.htm
http://home.earthlink.net/~streetwiz...s/under30.html
Seriously, it's time to wake up from your 3rd gen wet dream...

</font>
By no means do I take a magazine artcile to be law, but it makes a point.
Two objective (in theory) sources putting the 2 cars about equal.
Man, I really like 3rd gens and all, but the whole inflated view of 3rd gen capabilities is just astounding.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Z284ever:
Leaps and bounds?
....don't you mean hops and stumbles?
Originally posted by formula79:
but to me a 4th gen is leaps and bounds above a 3rd gen.
</font>
but to me a 4th gen is leaps and bounds above a 3rd gen.
</font>
....don't you mean hops and stumbles?

Take the average 93 Z28 and run it against the best third gen and it will get a hole stomped in it's a$$. I will be honest...If I couldn't afford a new car I would have to defend my old car too. If I remember right for the longest time 5.0L's were handing IROC's thier A$$.
------------------
Branden-Founder www.GMInsidenews.com
The #1 GM News Site on the Net!
1995 Firebird A4
White with red leather
1979 Firebird Formula SOLD!!! 8/2001
Visit my homepage!
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Z284ever:
I think in many ways 4th gen proponants are shooting themselves in the foot.
Why?
In order to validate and reaffirm your beliefs in your 4th gen you argue that certain specific aspects of your new car..are better than someone elses old car.
The shadow of the 3rd gen looms large over the 4th gen...doesn't it?
I'd doubt that in 10-20 years people will argue which will be better 4th gen or 5th gen.</font>
I think in many ways 4th gen proponants are shooting themselves in the foot.
Why?
In order to validate and reaffirm your beliefs in your 4th gen you argue that certain specific aspects of your new car..are better than someone elses old car.
The shadow of the 3rd gen looms large over the 4th gen...doesn't it?
I'd doubt that in 10-20 years people will argue which will be better 4th gen or 5th gen.</font>
The early 70's Trans Am's were beasts that didn't have thier performance matched untill the LT1. SD 455 anyone? Plus teh second gen cars were the best handling cars of thier day, next to a Corvette. In the late 70's, the Trans Am matter of fact was GM's flagship. I think in 79, they sold 250,000+ firebirds and almost as many Camaro's. If anything for how well the second gen thrived in the bad performance times I would say that it had a better run than the third generation.
For some reason whenever I have been in a third gen I feel like I am in an Escort on steriods.
------------------
Branden-Founder www.GMInsidenews.com
The #1 GM News Site on the Net!
1995 Firebird A4
White with red leather
1979 Firebird Formula SOLD!!! 8/2001
Visit my homepage!
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by formula79:
I will be honest...If I couldn't afford a new car I would have to defend my old car too.
</font>
I will be honest...If I couldn't afford a new car I would have to defend my old car too.
</font>
I'd bet that with at all the 3rd gens you purportedly see at the trailer parks you cruise through, ....they must think that you are some kind of movie star over there.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by formula79:
The early 70's Trans Am's were beasts that didn't have thier performance matched untill the LT1.
</font>
The early 70's Trans Am's were beasts that didn't have thier performance matched untill the LT1.
</font>
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Z284ever:
When you say LT1..are you referring to the 701/2 Z/28 which could show it's tail lights to any Trans Am.....or do you consider that a trailer park ornament also?
Originally posted by formula79:
The early 70's Trans Am's were beasts that didn't have thier performance matched untill the LT1.
</font>
The early 70's Trans Am's were beasts that didn't have thier performance matched untill the LT1.
</font>
When I bought my car I test drove a 99 V6 (Insurence on the V8 is too much, I will wait till next year.) and there was not onough of a difference to warrent the extra $7K that the dealer wanted over my 95. Plus I love the red interior and how clean the car is overall.
Red himself has said that it seems the most vocal complaints from 4th gen cars seem to come from people who have old Camaro's.....
My car has held up well for a daily driven 8 year old car...I am sur eyou dont drive that 91 Camaro everyday
What do you drive a Taurus???------------------
Branden-Founder www.GMInsidenews.com
The #1 GM News Site on the Net!
1995 Firebird A4
White with red leather
1979 Firebird Formula SOLD!!! 8/2001
Visit my homepage!
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Darth Xed:
OK, enough about the 3rd gen out-skidpadding the 4th gen
It's NOT true. Here's 2 artciles. One reviews the IROC-Z, another a 4th Gen:
IROC-Z: .85g on skidpad
4th GEN: .86 skidpad
http://www.iroc-z.com/articles/artic...ackarticle.htm
http://home.earthlink.net/~streetwiz...s/under30.html
Seriously, it's time to wake up from your 3rd gen wet dream...
</font>
OK, enough about the 3rd gen out-skidpadding the 4th gen
It's NOT true. Here's 2 artciles. One reviews the IROC-Z, another a 4th Gen:IROC-Z: .85g on skidpad
4th GEN: .86 skidpad
http://www.iroc-z.com/articles/artic...ackarticle.htm
http://home.earthlink.net/~streetwiz...s/under30.html
Seriously, it's time to wake up from your 3rd gen wet dream...

</font>
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Darth Xed:
By no means do I take a magazine artcile to be law, but it makes a point.
Two objective (in theory) sources putting the 2 cars about equal.
Man, I really like 3rd gens and all, but the whole inflated view of 3rd gen capabilities is just astounding.
</font>
By no means do I take a magazine artcile to be law, but it makes a point.
Two objective (in theory) sources putting the 2 cars about equal.
Man, I really like 3rd gens and all, but the whole inflated view of 3rd gen capabilities is just astounding.
</font>
Plus... you're taking stats from 2 totally different sources. You get your camaro stats from Road & Track, and your 4th gen info from some guy named Vinny. At least try to get info from the SAME magazine. Not that even the same magazine's numbers can make much of a comparison. But just to prove that no 2 magazines are the same, here's some thirdgen stuff to chew on:
Motor Trend (July 1990)
Lateral acceleration,0.90g
Hot Rod, January 1990:
Skidpad- .87g
Somewhere at home I've got an original road test of the 85 IROC. I believe it's the October issue of Car & Driver, but I could be mistaking. Anyway... they give a .90 test number to the skidpad too.
------------------
The IROC Homepage
View the Restoration of an 85 IROC
Weekend projects aren't.
[This message has been edited by Jim85IROC (edited July 15, 2002).]
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Jim85IROC:
Hang out at an SCCA or local track event if you live near a roadcourse and pay attention to whose cars go through the corners better.
</font>
Hang out at an SCCA or local track event if you live near a roadcourse and pay attention to whose cars go through the corners better.
</font>
Anyhooo.....3rd gens literally dominated showroom stock road racing in the '80s.
Porsche...with MEGA factory backing in'83 and'84, tried to dethrone the Z/28 for two years in SCCA showroom stock, with the 944.....unsuccessfully. They thought the Camaro would be a pushover...but (if I remember correctly)...they lost every race to the Camaro Z/28. After two seasons...Porsche decided to end the slaughter.
The 3rd gen Z/28 sent the boys from Zuffenhousen packing in discrace.
Does anyone follow the NASA Camaro-Mustang challenge series? How competitive are 3rd gens compared to 4th gens in that series?
[This message has been edited by Z284ever (edited July 15, 2002).]
Yup. And guess what?? IROC-Z's were getting .92 G's back in 85 dude. By GM themselves and magazines. Why don't people with Thirds say anything about 2nds?? Because the Thirds were alot better and theres no need to discuss that. There was so much interest in them no really thought about them, every1 was buying new Thirds. Today people still think about the Thirds and previous Gens and buy them instead of 4ths. Why do people with previous Gen F-Bodies say things about 4ths?? Because just like mostly every1 else we don't like them either.
BTW, did the 4ths ever make a most stolen list?? Its like thieves don't even have interest in them. It wasn't like that with Thirds. People are still after them today. They were the best looking cars on the road in their time and IMO are the best looking cars ever made.
BTW, did the 4ths ever make a most stolen list?? Its like thieves don't even have interest in them. It wasn't like that with Thirds. People are still after them today. They were the best looking cars on the road in their time and IMO are the best looking cars ever made.
I have to say this is probably your most ludacris post ever! Congrats! 
Haha well then, that is conveniently simple. You can't use sales as a big part of your argument for the 3rd vs. 4th and then ignore the fact that the 2nd outsold the 3rd. (I do agree that the 3rd Gen cars are nicer so don't jump all over me!)
Here we go with the "everybody" stuff again. You really need to take the time to buy a clue outside your circle of friends and aquaintances.
Honda Accords are the most stolen vehicle every year for the past 10+ years. Do you really think it's because they are a desireable car in terms of speed, handling, looks, etc.???? Of course not. They sell a bizillion of them every year and their parts are valuable. So yeah, the 3rd Gen sold very well. Not sure why you'd need to brag about more of your cars being stolen and stripped. 
Ok umm, the 3rd generation Camaro is the best looking car, ever? For the love of everything holy in the Auto industry, put down the crack pipe and slowly step away....
EDIT--By the way IZ28, check out Branden's poll at gminsidenews.com about "which gen F-body is your favorite". After 120 votes, I think you'll be shocked at what you see so far. Better make sure you go there and vote over and over again all night.
------------------
Mark
94 Z28, Red, A4, 3:23
Lone Mods--LPE CAI, !Lapeer Dragway.
(Hey, I'm a college boy I can't afford gobs of bolt-ons!)
Best time: 14.658 @ 95.1
with SES light on and Driver off! (First and only time at track)
The F-body will NEVER die.
[This message has been edited by Z28Wilson (edited July 15, 2002).]
[This message has been edited by Z28Wilson (edited July 15, 2002).]

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by IZ28:
Why don't people with Thirds say anything about 2nds?? Because the Thirds were alot better and theres no need to discuss that.
</font>
Why don't people with Thirds say anything about 2nds?? Because the Thirds were alot better and theres no need to discuss that.
</font>
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Today people still think about the Thirds and previous Gens and buy them instead of 4ths. Why do people with previous Gen F-Bodies say things about 4ths?? Because just like mostly every1 else we don't like them either. 
</font>

</font>
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">BTW, did the 4ths ever make a most stolen list?? Its like thieves don't even have interest in them.
</font>
</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">They were the best looking cars on the road in their time and IMO are the best looking cars ever made.
</font>
EDIT--By the way IZ28, check out Branden's poll at gminsidenews.com about "which gen F-body is your favorite". After 120 votes, I think you'll be shocked at what you see so far. Better make sure you go there and vote over and over again all night.

------------------
Mark
94 Z28, Red, A4, 3:23
Lone Mods--LPE CAI, !Lapeer Dragway.
(Hey, I'm a college boy I can't afford gobs of bolt-ons!)
Best time: 14.658 @ 95.1
with SES light on and Driver off! (First and only time at track)
The F-body will NEVER die.
[This message has been edited by Z28Wilson (edited July 15, 2002).]
[This message has been edited by Z28Wilson (edited July 15, 2002).]
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Z28Wilson:
EDIT--By the way IZ28, check out Branden's poll at gminsidenews.com about "which gen F-body is your favorite". After 120 votes, I think you'll be shocked at what you see so far. Better make sure you go there and vote over and over again all night.
</font>
EDIT--By the way IZ28, check out Branden's poll at gminsidenews.com about "which gen F-body is your favorite". After 120 votes, I think you'll be shocked at what you see so far. Better make sure you go there and vote over and over again all night.

</font>


