Honda to cut Ridgeline production again
Re: Honda to cut Ridgeline production again
Originally Posted by evok
I just wonder how this thread were to read if GM build there own Ridgline/Rampage off Lambda?
Don't laugh!
Don't laugh!
Re: Honda to cut Ridgeline production again
Originally Posted by evok
I just wonder how this thread were to read if GM build there own Ridgline/Rampage off Lambda?
Don't laugh!
Don't laugh!
If Chevy replaced the 1500 Silverado with a Lamda pickup, people would be pissed. If Chevy built a Lamda Crew cab "truck" and it looked like the Holden Crewman Cross 8 and they marketed it as a crossover pickup, and not a 1/2 ton I think people would love it.
Last edited by Z28x; Feb 10, 2006 at 02:58 PM.
Re: Honda to cut Ridgeline production again
Originally Posted by evok
I just wonder how this thread were to read if GM build there own Ridgline/Rampage off Lambda?
Don't laugh!
Don't laugh!
Re: Honda to cut Ridgeline production again
Just goes to show, if the media are gonna turn this truck into something it ain't, it won't work! That's the way it should be. And Honda are reluctant to drop prices... so they cut production!
Re: Honda to cut Ridgeline production again
Originally Posted by Z28x
It is designed to look like it has a fake midgate. Why use the Avalanche slanted C-pillar if you don't have a mid-gate? Also the slanted bed rails look terrible
The Rampage looks awesome and I hope Dodge builds that.
The Rampage looks awesome and I hope Dodge builds that.It's interesting to see Honda's response to lower-than-expected sales. Even at a 53 day supply (quite small by domestic standards), they choose to cut production rather than pile on excessive incentives and water down residual values and reputation.
Re: Honda to cut Ridgeline production again
Originally Posted by R377
The slanted C pillar really doesn't have anything to do with the midgate, even on the Avalanche. It's partly for styling, since a truck with one long side body stamping would look odd with a vertical rear section on the cab. And it's partly for aerodynamics for when the back window is open.
It's interesting to see Honda's response to lower-than-expected sales. Even at a 53 day supply (quite small by domestic standards), they choose to cut production rather than pile on excessive incentives and water down residual values and reputation.
It's interesting to see Honda's response to lower-than-expected sales. Even at a 53 day supply (quite small by domestic standards), they choose to cut production rather than pile on excessive incentives and water down residual values and reputation.
Didn't it say that Honda had put heavy incentives on the Ridgeline to get the supply down, even after they said they wouldn't and after the initial production cut.
Re: Honda to cut Ridgeline production again
I thought it was 2006 Truck of the Year...
Maybe it's the price, a Colorado starts about $16K, Ridgeline at $27K.? that $27K will get a Mid-level Silverado.
I personally never liked the Avalanche styling, too fake looking to me. And the Ridgeline looks like a bench mark styled copy, scaled down ofcourse. Imprt brands love playing up the large "size" of US trucks as a negative.
As far as the Holden trucks, maybe in some areas, but here I believe the Colorado would be better recieved. Looks too much like a sedan with a truck like greenhouse.
If you're gonna make a truck, make a "truck".
Maybe it's the price, a Colorado starts about $16K, Ridgeline at $27K.? that $27K will get a Mid-level Silverado.
I personally never liked the Avalanche styling, too fake looking to me. And the Ridgeline looks like a bench mark styled copy, scaled down ofcourse. Imprt brands love playing up the large "size" of US trucks as a negative.
As far as the Holden trucks, maybe in some areas, but here I believe the Colorado would be better recieved. Looks too much like a sedan with a truck like greenhouse.
If you're gonna make a truck, make a "truck".
Re: Honda to cut Ridgeline production again
Originally Posted by 90rocz
I thought it was 2006 Truck of the Year...
Maybe it's the price, a Colorado starts about $16K, Ridgeline at $27K.? that $27K will get a Mid-level Silverado.
I personally never liked the Avalanche styling, too fake looking to me. And the Ridgeline looks like a bench mark styled copy, scaled down ofcourse. Imprt brands love playing up the large "size" of US trucks as a negative.
As far as the Holden trucks, maybe in some areas, but here I believe the Colorado would be better recieved. Looks too much like a sedan with a truck like greenhouse.
If you're gonna make a truck, make a "truck".
Maybe it's the price, a Colorado starts about $16K, Ridgeline at $27K.? that $27K will get a Mid-level Silverado.
I personally never liked the Avalanche styling, too fake looking to me. And the Ridgeline looks like a bench mark styled copy, scaled down ofcourse. Imprt brands love playing up the large "size" of US trucks as a negative.
As far as the Holden trucks, maybe in some areas, but here I believe the Colorado would be better recieved. Looks too much like a sedan with a truck like greenhouse.
If you're gonna make a truck, make a "truck".
Re: Honda to cut Ridgeline production again
Originally Posted by SNEAKY NEIL
I read that the "flying buttress" C pillar is for structural ridgidity due in partly to the midgate and because the Suburban chassis was not really meant to have a bed.
Didn't it say that Honda had put heavy incentives on the Ridgeline to get the supply down, even after they said they wouldn't and after the initial production cut.
Didn't it say that Honda had put heavy incentives on the Ridgeline to get the supply down, even after they said they wouldn't and after the initial production cut.
Honda did use incentives to get inventories down to an appropriate level, although in typical Honda fashion they were dealer incentives rather than consumer incentives. And once they got inventory down to a reasonable level they reduced supply to match demand rather than try to keep sales artificially high.
Re: Honda to cut Ridgeline production again
The Ridgeline comes standard with a myriad of equipment. Equip the Colorado the same and you'll find the prices are extremely similar.
Re: Honda to cut Ridgeline production again
The IDEA behind the Ridgeline is pretty good. The DESIGN IMO is awful. To top it off, Honda marketing it as a truck is off putting.
The rear under bed storage area, and the dual opening tailgate is pretty sweet. It seats 4 comfortably, and has room for 5. It's the right size, and it has the potential of pulling many buyers out of large SUVs. With the success of the Equinox, the potential for a homerun with this type of vehicle is there.
BUT.....
...over 60% of all small & medium SUV buyers are women (the highest of any segment). The Ridgeline is marketed as a truck and looks the way it does because men account for well over 60% of the pickup truck market. Beyond that, it's geared to young single men. Young single men aren't particularly drawn to Honda beyond VTECs and Acuras.
Give it a less rugged more appealing design, market it as an all purpose SUV with a bed (like a Rav4, that can move furniture), and it should do well and have more stable sales numbers.
The rear under bed storage area, and the dual opening tailgate is pretty sweet. It seats 4 comfortably, and has room for 5. It's the right size, and it has the potential of pulling many buyers out of large SUVs. With the success of the Equinox, the potential for a homerun with this type of vehicle is there.
BUT.....
...over 60% of all small & medium SUV buyers are women (the highest of any segment). The Ridgeline is marketed as a truck and looks the way it does because men account for well over 60% of the pickup truck market. Beyond that, it's geared to young single men. Young single men aren't particularly drawn to Honda beyond VTECs and Acuras.
Give it a less rugged more appealing design, market it as an all purpose SUV with a bed (like a Rav4, that can move furniture), and it should do well and have more stable sales numbers.
Re: Honda to cut Ridgeline production again
Which Toyota truck is the Ridgeline competing against, the Tundra, or the Tacoma? From its price range it looks more Tundra-oriented, which is a joke. The Tundra could bitch slap that thing 6 ways from Sunday. I have never understood Honda's reluctancy to add a V8 to their lineup; Toyota did it. Nissan/Infiniti did it. The American people want them!
Re: Honda to cut Ridgeline production again
Originally Posted by guionM
...over 60% of all small & medium SUV buyers are women (the highest of any segment). The Ridgeline is marketed as a truck and looks the way it does because men account for well over 60% of the pickup truck market. Beyond that, it's geared to young single men. Young single men aren't particularly drawn to Honda beyond VTECs and Acuras.
Give it a less rugged more appealing design, market it as an all purpose SUV with a bed (like a Rav4, that can move furniture), and it should do well and have more stable sales numbers.
Give it a less rugged more appealing design, market it as an all purpose SUV with a bed (like a Rav4, that can move furniture), and it should do well and have more stable sales numbers.


