Here's your V10 (or V12) Escalade-V.... in time for 2006!
Just out of curiousity, does anyone know what transmission they're sticking behind the V12? Certainly not any of the existing 4-speeds, I'd hope, and almost certainly not the 5-speed Allison. So does that mean we'll see the debut of the X15R 6-speed? Which would be kinda odd, because if there's anything a huge V12 needs, it's not 6 closely-spaced gears (I'm assuming here that the torque curve would be flatter than most pool tables).
BTW - good post, ProudPony
BTW - good post, ProudPony
Originally posted by Eric Bryant
Just out of curiousity, does anyone know what transmission they're sticking behind the V12? Certainly not any of the existing 4-speeds, I'd hope, and almost certainly not the 5-speed Allison. So does that mean we'll see the debut of the X15R 6-speed? Which would be kinda odd, because if there's anything a huge V12 needs, it's not 6 closely-spaced gears (I'm assuming here that the torque curve would be flatter than most pool tables).
BTW - good post, ProudPony
Just out of curiousity, does anyone know what transmission they're sticking behind the V12? Certainly not any of the existing 4-speeds, I'd hope, and almost certainly not the 5-speed Allison. So does that mean we'll see the debut of the X15R 6-speed? Which would be kinda odd, because if there's anything a huge V12 needs, it's not 6 closely-spaced gears (I'm assuming here that the torque curve would be flatter than most pool tables).
BTW - good post, ProudPony
The only down side to the diesel (especially the older 7.3) is the maintenance. You MUST do maintenance, or performance suffers terribly, and repairs will ensue quickly. Water separator in the fuel line, fuel filter changes, expensive oil filters, and (in my case) 14-quarts of oil every 3500 miles - now that sucks! But when the oil gets dirty, everything starts acting up... the engine oil is used to lube the turbo, actuate valves, and also to operate the fuel injection system. The first sign of dirty or broken-down oil is the engine starves a little under hard acceleration because valves don't lift fully and the fuel load is shy a bit. Trust me on this.
The 7.3L Power Stroke is a great motor, (I install them all the time.) its made by the company I work for; "International Truck & Engine Corp." or as most remember it, "International Harvester"except they sold the Agricultural part...The 7.3L PS is the SAME engine in the 2+Ton Medium Duty "Straight Trucks"...It IS quieter and a "Smokeless" diesel...
I too think it makes more sense in Large truck/SUV applications than gas...hands down!! Especially since companies like "BullyDog" etc make tuner boxes that add like 40-50HP, and loads of other "Bolt-On"parts that can nearly DOUBLE the HP rating in them!!!
Originally posted by Eric Bryant
Maybe you could do an informal poll of repeat GM customers and see how many of them got so disgusted with previous attempts at light-truck diesels that they'd never consider asking for one again
Maybe you could do an informal poll of repeat GM customers and see how many of them got so disgusted with previous attempts at light-truck diesels that they'd never consider asking for one again
BTW, I believe the DMAX factory is still operating near maximum capacity, which is why GM doesn't mind charging $7,600 for the option, and which is why they're in no rush to introduce them in the SUVs. After all, even the old Suburbans had the 6.2 so GM must've seen a market there. They just don't have the capacity to fill it right now.
Originally posted by R377
I don't think that's a fair comment. Yes the old 6.2 was underpowered and lacked reliability, but I don't think anyone confuses it with the Duramax. People know the Duramax is al-new and are not likely to let their opinions of an entirely unrelated engine cloud their judgement.
I don't think that's a fair comment. Yes the old 6.2 was underpowered and lacked reliability, but I don't think anyone confuses it with the Duramax. People know the Duramax is al-new and are not likely to let their opinions of an entirely unrelated engine cloud their judgement.
BTW, I believe the DMAX factory is still operating near maximum capacity, which is why GM doesn't mind charging $7,600 for the option, and which is why they're in no rush to introduce them in the SUVs. After all, even the old Suburbans had the 6.2 so GM must've seen a market there. They just don't have the capacity to fill it right now.
You know, GM supposidly did tinker around with a V10 LS engine? I read about it in GMHTP a while back.. Since the design was basically a V8 with two extra cylinders, it had its own set of issues , but raw power wise, it fared pretty well.. In the end, GM knew they could build a bigger V8 easier and had so much success with bigblock V8's..
Uh, a diesel doesn't really help much with trailering, except for the improved mileage. A 8100 Vortec will yank a trailer around just as well as the Duramax, but it might suck 2-3x the fuel doing it.
Originally posted by GN1270
An LS1 would do it too. You take the vortech, put an enclosed 26ft trailer with a car on it, and drive it around daily like that. Do the same with the diesel. I'll bet the vortech drivetrain lasts 50k miles before either the engine or tranny are shot, and the Duramax/ Allison combo will still go 200k+ miles. Thats the difference. An indestructable driveline that will last twice as long as the gas version. JMHO
An LS1 would do it too. You take the vortech, put an enclosed 26ft trailer with a car on it, and drive it around daily like that. Do the same with the diesel. I'll bet the vortech drivetrain lasts 50k miles before either the engine or tranny are shot, and the Duramax/ Allison combo will still go 200k+ miles. Thats the difference. An indestructable driveline that will last twice as long as the gas version. JMHO
The ol' gas big-block has proven to be very reliable in heavy-duty service for a long time now. It had to be - the 6.2/6.5 was never taken seriously by commerical users.
Now, I'm certainly not going to claim that the 8100 is more durable than the Duramax - by no means. But it's not like the gasser is some kid's toy that's going to wear out if used like the rest of the truck was intended.
And also note that the 8100 comes with the Allison in the pickup trucks. While it only gets the 4L85E in the 'lanches and Suburban 2500, that transmission isn't exactly a piece of junk.
I'm not really sure how this post relates to my earlier thoughts in this thread
$7600 by no means reflects the net cost of ownership for the of the Duramax/Allison. Go price what a used 2002 HD truck with 6.0/4L80E is worth versus same truck with Duramax/Allison. I did this at KBB and the Durmax equipped truck with 50k miles on it was worth $5800 more than the 6.0 equivalent. Net cost being $1800.
Owning a Duramax maintenance cost so far at 43k miles haven't been enough to make an issue about it. Oil changes around 7k miles 10 qts with filter $30 each change. Two Allison spin on filters at $9 each and a fluid change once at 25k $80. Rear diff fluid change $30. On 3rd fuel filter at $15 each. So around $325 - $350 in maintenance costs so far.
Looking at the entire scope of cost and ownership end to end in makes diesel offerings very attractive to a good many folks.
Owning a Duramax maintenance cost so far at 43k miles haven't been enough to make an issue about it. Oil changes around 7k miles 10 qts with filter $30 each change. Two Allison spin on filters at $9 each and a fluid change once at 25k $80. Rear diff fluid change $30. On 3rd fuel filter at $15 each. So around $325 - $350 in maintenance costs so far.
Looking at the entire scope of cost and ownership end to end in makes diesel offerings very attractive to a good many folks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
guionM
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
69
Nov 30, 2006 02:01 PM



