Good article on Toyota's secrative vehicle event recorders
#16
As for me?
I'm OK with event recorders as they can vindicate in the process of indicating the actual facts.
Last edited by 1fastdog; 02-23-2010 at 05:01 PM.
#17
#18
Not me , the event recorder in my SS proved I was not speeding and was decelerating and proved witnesses wrong . If u have nothing to hide an event recorder is really a non issue . If an accident is your fault , why is it wrong to know exacly what the situation was at the time of the accident ?
Isn't there a way to remove the box without causing any other issues?
#19
And while it adds expense to the vehicle, its an unobtrusive system that only activates once the tire is pretty much considered critically low.
However to extend the logic, why should manufacturers install anything other than a speedometer - does somebody operating a vehicle really need to know when the engine is losing oil pressure or going to overheat or isn't producing enough voltage? In the scheme of things, an engine going t!t$ up isn't nearly as dangerous as a tire blowing out.
Last edited by bossco; 02-24-2010 at 08:05 PM.
#20
Not me , the event recorder in my SS proved I was not speeding and was decelerating and proved witnesses wrong . If u have nothing to hide an event recorder is really a non issue . If an accident is your fault , why is it wrong to know exacly what the situation was at the time of the accident ?
Or even a linked system that transmits the data so taht it can be comapred againt local laws and citations are automatically issued without an officer present at anytime.
In Arizona, when a speed camera gets you, the fine is structured in such a way that it doesn't count against your liscence and you have no legal recourse but to pay the fine.
Granted, this is all far fetched, but I dont put anything out of the realm of possibility when the goverment is damn near bankrupt finacially.
#21
#22
Thats great, the system worked to your advantage, but imagine in a scenario similar to what I had mentioned and you get pulled for something like a blown taillight and the officer DL's the EDR's stored info and then issues you additional tickets for speeding and not wearing your seatbelt when he wasn't even around.
.
.
#23
It's not really a, "Big Brother" issue for me. It's just something that my step-dad and I finally see eye to eye about with cars.
He's damn near 60 and crotchety, and while he knows that it's unsafe he drives without wearing his seatbelt.
Reasoning? Oh, he thinks they're a great invention. Used them for quite sometime on previous vehicles. UNTIL the "Gubment" deemed them mandatory in his eyes it's more of an Eff-you sentiment.
He's damn near 60 and crotchety, and while he knows that it's unsafe he drives without wearing his seatbelt.
Reasoning? Oh, he thinks they're a great invention. Used them for quite sometime on previous vehicles. UNTIL the "Gubment" deemed them mandatory in his eyes it's more of an Eff-you sentiment.
Yea, let's put ourselves at risk! That'll show that pesky government!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fbodfather
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
25
06-21-2002 04:12 PM