Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Gmx-551

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 10:33 AM
  #106  
turbo200's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 222
right, because the design "concept" or theme can be transferred to any car, regardless of size, platform...as is shown throughout BMW, MB, Audi, etc..

BUT an exact design that was raved about and called stunning to be transferred to another platform requires complete revisions at the hardpoints of that platform. And there are many "hardpoints", things like wheel size to metal ratio make a huge difference in the appearance of design, to the height of a beltline, to the height of the front end in relation to the winshield and the angle that hits at. All of these can heavily affect a design, and the designers ability to create something great. Malibu is a great looking car on EP, but it definitely looks FWD and less sporty and more towards practical and heavy.
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 11:23 AM
  #107  
CaminoLS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 929
If the Impala is to be FWD, they shouldn't bother to build one at all. It would be a net negative in the lineup.
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 01:25 PM
  #108  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by CaminoLS6
If the Impala is to be FWD, they shouldn't bother to build one at all. It would be a net negative in the lineup.
How do you figure? Is it not the best selling Chevy sedan today?
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 11:03 PM
  #109  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Originally Posted by teal98
But I think the Sebring and Avenger don't work at all, whereas the Charger and 300 work quite well for what they were trying to do.

The Sebring and Avenger are just plain ugly, and I think a lot of that is due to the FWD proportions.

Sort of like the way the C-class and 3-series hatchbacks never quite worked, due to proportions being wrong.

Imagine the new Camaro with the hood shortened 6 inches and with an extra foot of front overhang ... if you have a strong stomach
I think a better example of RWD->FWD design sharing is the now old Caddy CTS->BLS. The cars are very similar and both work well but the BLS is FWD.
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 11:26 PM
  #110  
FUTURE_OF_GM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 632
From: NC
Originally Posted by turbo200
right, because the design "concept" or theme can be transferred to any car, regardless of size, platform...as is shown throughout BMW, MB, Audi, etc..

BUT an exact design that was raved about and called stunning to be transferred to another platform requires complete revisions at the hardpoints of that platform. And there are many "hardpoints", things like wheel size to metal ratio make a huge difference in the appearance of design, to the height of a beltline, to the height of the front end in relation to the winshield and the angle that hits at. All of these can heavily affect a design, and the designers ability to create something great. Malibu is a great looking car on EP, but it definitely looks FWD and less sporty and more towards practical and heavy.
Fortunately, EP II has the ability to have completely unique exteriors barring the roof. So, that probably helps things out a bit.
Old Jan 6, 2008 | 11:45 AM
  #111  
CaminoLS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 929
Originally Posted by jg95z28
How do you figure? Is it not the best selling Chevy sedan today?
Previous to the arrival of Malibu, and in large percentage to fleet.

The expense of fielding an all new version likely won't net the same sales result with the new, larger, Malibu in the same showroom. A RWD version, on the other hand, opens a market Chevy isn't currently in and would not be parasitic on Malibu.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 PM.