GM working on a compact truck?
I don't know why they don't base a new V6 for the trucks based off of the 6.2 liter V8's. That should be good for a 275hp cam in block V6 that would be pretty badass IMO.
As a GM tech I would own a 4.3 small truck way before a 3.6 truck. Besides, the truck is supposed to be cheap anyway. I've seen way more 3.6's torn apart for timing chains, piston wrings, and oil leaks than 4.3's. And 4.3's are already super torquey.
Anyway I would be interested in a "small" truck with a ecotec and a A6 transmission
As a GM tech I would own a 4.3 small truck way before a 3.6 truck. Besides, the truck is supposed to be cheap anyway. I've seen way more 3.6's torn apart for timing chains, piston wrings, and oil leaks than 4.3's. And 4.3's are already super torquey.
Anyway I would be interested in a "small" truck with a ecotec and a A6 transmission
Well personally I believe we should move to an era where the small truck is based around a 4 cylinder anyway. If they had to I suppose they could make a new intake manifold or recam the 3.6L if you are all afraid it doesn't make enough torque. However, I still think the pull should be fuel economy with a nice NA I4 and optional turbo motor... especially since we really haven't seen a turbo 4 in a small truck it may open up the market to new kinds of buyers. Especially if the truck is a good bit cheaper than the fullsizes and will likely appeal most to young buyers.
Just curious what exactly you do not like about it.
What exactly do you not like about it? Do you think it is unreliable? Do you think it has to many moving parts? Do you think it is to large/heavy? Do you think it has lower power output? Does it idle rough/drive poorly?
Just curious what exactly you do not like about it.
Just curious what exactly you do not like about it.
The biggest thing with this truck is making it cheap!
I was looking into possible issues if we bought my wife a CTS and I could not believe how many people had problems with the 3.6L DI timing chain stretching. Seemed to happen between 25-40K, and the majority of issues were with the early model 2008 cars.
Last edited by Silverado C-10; Jun 3, 2010 at 03:48 PM.
Shouldn't the money be better spent improving the issues with the 3.6 instead of creating an all new engine.
If I am remembering what I read correctly, there was a bad batch of chains from the chain vendor.... I was under the impression this was no longer an issue.
Well personally I believe we should move to an era where the small truck is based around a 4 cylinder anyway. If they had to I suppose they could make a new intake manifold or recam the 3.6L if you are all afraid it doesn't make enough torque. However, I still think the pull should be fuel economy with a nice NA I4 and optional turbo motor... especially since we really haven't seen a turbo 4 in a small truck it may open up the market to new kinds of buyers. Especially if the truck is a good bit cheaper than the fullsizes and will likely appeal most to young buyers.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



