Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

GM working on a compact truck?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2010, 11:16 AM
  #31  
Registered User
 
zq8colorado04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tallanasty, FL
Posts: 268


Now there's an idea!
zq8colorado04 is offline  
Old 05-27-2010, 11:57 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
Silverado C-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,897
Originally Posted by Z28x
They still make them in 2010
Sorry, I should have quoted you, this should make more sense

Originally Posted by Z28x
Another thing is by the 2000's everyone wanted Crew cabs. How did the S-10 Crew cab do compared to the Colorado?
Originally Posted by Silverado C-10
Hard to tell, if I remember right, it was only available in 2003-2004.
...and I should have added that I believe in 2004, that was the ONLY S-10 you could buy... so there really isn't any data to compare.

Last edited by Silverado C-10; 05-27-2010 at 12:02 PM.
Silverado C-10 is offline  
Old 05-27-2010, 12:15 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
jg95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 9,710
From wikipedia:
2010
The 2010 S10 is produced in Brazil only, as of right now. It is offered in four different body styles: Colina (base), Tornado, Executive, and Advantage. The drivetrains are the 2.4 L flexpower engine and the 2.8 L turbo diesel motor. It has an enhanced safety system including collision avoidance, steel ladder type frame, two stage multileaf rear springs, crush zones, side door beams, PASSlock system, remote keyless entry, and driver and passenger side airbags. It also has features to keep it looking good throughout the life of it, such as a corrosion resistant frame, galvanized steel body panels, advanced clear coat paint, double wall welded pickup box, and stainless steel exhaust.
I was just about to post to make mine a regular cab, long bed, with a split bench, LNF and 5spd manual, but dang a 2.8L turbo diesel would be sweet!
jg95z28 is offline  
Old 05-27-2010, 12:36 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
zq8colorado04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tallanasty, FL
Posts: 268


A Chevy version of this would work too...
zq8colorado04 is offline  
Old 05-27-2010, 12:41 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
Aaron91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 163
This was all the rage with the younger crowd in the 90's.
Name:  100_0346.jpg
Views: 4
Size:  57.5 KB
At least someone had the foresight to keep going with the overall idea.

Last edited by Aaron91RS; 05-27-2010 at 02:52 PM.
Aaron91RS is offline  
Old 05-27-2010, 01:49 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
jg95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 9,710
Originally Posted by zq8colorado04


A Chevy version of this would work too...
But that's not a truck!
jg95z28 is offline  
Old 05-27-2010, 02:07 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
zq8colorado04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tallanasty, FL
Posts: 268
Originally Posted by jg95z28
But that's not a truck!

It's got a bed
zq8colorado04 is offline  
Old 05-27-2010, 02:26 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
Silverado C-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,897
Originally Posted by zq8colorado04
It's got a bed
...and Jessica Alba and Rosie O'donnell both have bajingles... but they both have very different uses for them

I'll take a "real" truck with a "real" bed over any of those fugly unibody trucks!

The S-10 was just "magic."

Overall, it was cheap (or could be cheaply optioned), it could be very fuel efficient, or it could be quite zippy, manul or auto, it had tons and tons of different configurations, you could get a slammed body clad exteme or a jacked up off road ZR2, manual or power windows/doors, reg, ext, or crew cab, long bed or short, the list goes on and on, not to mention most think that it was a great looking truck. It also had (and still has) HUGE aftermarket support. I don't think we'll ever see another pick-up as "versatile" as the S-10 was.

Last edited by Silverado C-10; 05-27-2010 at 02:32 PM.
Silverado C-10 is offline  
Old 05-27-2010, 02:28 PM
  #39  
Registered User
 
Z28Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 6,166
Yeah, a GM Ridgeline isn't high on my list of must-sees.
Z28Wilson is offline  
Old 05-27-2010, 03:50 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
toneloc12345's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: OHIO
Posts: 586
I'd hope they put the 4.3 back in it! Everyone loved the 4.3, and lots at the dealership were turned off by a "5 cylinder??!!"
toneloc12345 is offline  
Old 05-27-2010, 06:41 PM
  #41  
Registered User
 
HuJass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: CNY
Posts: 2,224
I had a '96 Sonoma SLS regular cab, shortbed. 2.2, M5, 3.73. Pretty stripped except for the uplevel interior. I loved that little truck. I lowered it, put ZQ8 rims on it, installed factory fog lamps and a factory CD player. I drove the hell out of it. Some jackass crossed the centerline and it collected my truck. Even in death, it performed admirably.

Then I got an '89 S-15 4x4 as a stop-gap vehicle until I could get my Colorado. It was a long bed, regular cab. It had nothing in it except the A/T, cassette, and cruise. The thing was a rot box but it ran great. I even kept it as a winter rat after the Colorado came in.

I got my then-g/f an '89 Blazer as a winter rat. I kept that until I moved to St. Louis.

And now I have a '99 Blazer as a winter vehicle/dog vehicle. Paid 3K for this one and it was worth every penny.

But I do really like my Colorado as well. I just wish it had a better interior and a bit more refinement. The use of the 3.6 V-6 would have went a long way to increase the refinement level.
I hope the next small truck keeps the Colorado's dimensions. I think they are just about perfect.

As a sidebar, my Colly is EXACTLY like the white one pictured in this thread.
HuJass is offline  
Old 05-27-2010, 07:40 PM
  #42  
Registered User
 
91_z28_4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Pewee Valley, KY
Posts: 4,600
Originally Posted by Aaron91RS
This was all the rage with the younger crowd in the 90's.

At least someone had the foresight to keep going with the overall idea.
Really?
91_z28_4me is offline  
Old 05-27-2010, 08:55 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
Aaron91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 163
just like the real thing only bigger
Aaron91RS is offline  
Old 05-27-2010, 09:02 PM
  #44  
Registered User
 
91_z28_4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Pewee Valley, KY
Posts: 4,600
Originally Posted by Aaron91RS
just like the real thing only bigger
I don't quite understand your comment. The Tacoma is larger than the Colorado. Are you saying the Colorado is to big to be a successor to the S10 but the Tacoma is a worthy successor?
91_z28_4me is offline  
Old 05-27-2010, 11:41 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
VladimirSteel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 471
Originally Posted by toneloc12345
I'd hope they put the 4.3 back in it! Everyone loved the 4.3, and lots at the dealership were turned off by a "5 cylinder??!!"
who likes the 4.3? I hate that damn engine. Do they still offer it in silverados? i hope not... it should have been killed off for something better 20 years ago...
VladimirSteel is offline  


Quick Reply: GM working on a compact truck?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 AM.