Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

GM top Exec. don't want to give up anything?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2008, 09:50 AM
  #136  
Registered User
 
Dynamo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 0
Originally Posted by Evilfrog
That's Chairman Ford, and I give him every credit to him for setting that example. However the article says that CEO Mulally had a $28 million salary last year. If he is not taking a salary (or a severely reduced one) then I guess I take back what I said.
Dynamo is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 09:50 AM
  #137  
Registered User
 
mdenz3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,173
Originally Posted by Robert_Nashville
A joke?

It's like showing up at a food kitchen in a Limo and asking for a free meal.

It was an incredibly stupid thing to do while begging for money from the government.
Yes it is a joke, when you figure out the real costs and the seemingly unending issues with flying on commercial airlines, using the already paid for private jet is a no brainer.

Your analogy is off. It would more closely resemble going to a food kitchen in a limo and asking for 2 Billion free meals to save hundreds of thousands who depend on you, when the limo was already paid for and the driver was going to get paid whether you used his service or not.
mdenz3 is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 10:12 AM
  #138  
Banned
 
Robert_Nashville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,943
Facts are rarely the issue when it comes to politics…surely everyone (even Fbodfather) knows that.

This is not an issue of what might have made sense economically (plane already paid for) what made sense rationally (avoiding typical airline issues)…it’s a matter of perception - anybody who doesn’t see that is either to caught up in their passion for Detroit or is to stubborn to acknowledge it.

I wouldn’t care if Wagoner owned his own private jet and paid for the entire trip out of his own pocket – showing up in a private jet to go to Congress and beg for taxpayer money was a truly idiotic thing to do.

If Detroit doesn’t get their bailout it will likely be due to moves like using private jets and the attitudes displayed at the hearing Tuesday and Wednesday than due to any facts about the issue.


--------------------
Just another thought…

Why the hell in this day and age when we are all so “green” conscious and Detroit bleeding red ink…whey do they have to “fly” anywhere…whey do they have corporate jets at all?

Have people not heard of videoconferencing?

Last edited by Robert_Nashville; 11-20-2008 at 10:20 AM. Reason: Just another thought...
Robert_Nashville is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 10:23 AM
  #139  
Registered User
 
mdenz3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,173
Originally Posted by Robert_Nashville
Facts are rarely the issue when it comes to politics…surely everyone (even Fbodfather) knows that.
With politics being banned on this forum lets stick wit the facts.

Originally Posted by Robert_Nashville
This is not an issue of what might have made sense economically (plane already paid for) what made sense rationally (avoiding typical airline issues)…it’s a matter of perception - anybody who doesn’t see that is either to caught up in their passion for Detroit or is to stubborn to acknowledge it.

I wouldn’t care if Wagoner owned his own private jet and paid for the entire trip out of his own pocket – showing up in a private jet to go to Congress and beg for taxpayer money was a truly idiotic thing to do.

If Detroit doesn’t get their bailout it will likely be due to moves like using private jets and the attitudes displayed at the hearing Tuesday and Wednesday than due to any facts about the issue.
I disaree with that view point. They mearly used the mode of transportation that made the most sense. Makeing a big news story out of it because you can easily spin it in your view points favor, is worse than idiotic its is irresponsible sensationalism.

Also, they didn't go to beg for tax payer money. They went to request loans or loan backing to save their corporations which employ hundreds of thousand directly and millions indirectly.

Although this may be a topic for a different thread, how many key Nissan, Honda, and Toyota suppliers do you think the big three could take with them? Is it really worth all that just because some feel Mr. Wagnor needs to be tought a tough lesson?
mdenz3 is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 10:34 AM
  #140  
Banned
 
Robert_Nashville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,943
Originally Posted by mdenz3
With politics being banned on this forum lets stick wit the facts.
As I've already discussed with the mods; this IS an issue of politics and there is no way to avoid that truth.


I disaree with that view point. They mearly used the mode of transportation that made the most sense. Makeing a big news story out of it because you can easily spin it in your view points favor, is worse than idiotic its is irresponsible sensationalism.

Also, they didn't go to beg for tax payer money. They went to request loans or loan backing to save their corporations which employ hundreds of thousand directly and millions indirectly.
You are free to disagree all you wish; I think, however, that the Congress and the public are not going to be on your side on this.


Although this may be a topic for a different thread, how many key Nissan, Honda, and Toyota suppliers do you think the big three could take with them? Is it really worth all that just because some feel Mr. Wagnor needs to be tought a tough lesson?
It is a topic for another thread (and it's already been mentioned many times).
Robert_Nashville is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 11:01 AM
  #141  
Registered User
 
Ultra_Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 511
It's all about destroying the UAW

Auto industry CEOs appeared on Capitol Hill ysterday to ask for a $25 billion bailout. Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) asked the top execs if they would be willing sell their corporate jets and travel home on commercial flights.

Sherman asked the CEOs, "I'm going to ask you to raise your hand if you are planning to sell your jet in place now and fly back commercial." "Let the record show, no hands went up," noted Sherman

MSNBC's Contessa Brewer and Mike Viqueira discussed the CEOs' lack of response. "I have to tell you, just listening to that is awkward," said Brewer.

These idiot CEO's are not helping themselves and they need to change their King Maker mentality very fast or they will go down in flames. Asking for a rescue package while flying in on private jets is freaking ludicrous.

No matter how we slice it, the Auto Industry is in big trouble and needs some help. We can't allow it to fold because of the ramifications that will be felt throughout the country and the good people who will lose their jobs. Millions of them actually. What most people don't realize is that the auto industry dying will hurt every single community in America through the dealer network.


Sen. Richard Shelby (R) and his pals are hellbent to break the UAW and as many unions as they can get their hands on and that's what is really going on here, but the media will never say that. Shelby has deep ties into the auto industry that wants unions busted.

What Shelby doesn't mention, of course, is that Alabama is a right to work state. Shelby also doesn't mention that Alabama is home to Honda, Toyota, Hyundai, and Mercedes plants.

Shelby also doesn't reveal that many of the cars those manufacturers make in Alabama, without unions, are precisely the kind of behemoths critics attack Detroit for making--only these have foreign nameplates: M-Class SUV, GL-Class SUV (a new model), Pilot SUV, Santa Fe SUV, plus engines for Tacoma and Tundra pick-ups and Sequoia SUVs.
In other words, Shelby isn't opposed to car companies that are stupidly committing and recommitting to SUVs. Rather, he's just opposed to car companies that make SUVs with union labor.
Ultra_Dog is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 11:04 AM
  #142  
Super Moderator
 
JakeRobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 9,488
Originally Posted by centric
Nope. Sorry. Not acceptable. Having done some business with private jet charter, I wouldn't be surprised if the cost of the private flight was even higher than $20k.
Not arguing the numbers here (as they have been logically demonstrated to be reasonable), but owning your own jet, with a salaried pilot, is a different situation than chartering a plane.

Originally Posted by onebadponcho
These fatcats are asking us to sacrifice OUR money
No, they're asking for a loan. Assuming that the loan actually gets them out of this mess, there is no sacrifice in it for taxpayers.

Originally Posted by robvas
Think about what a CEO makes, hourly.
CEOs don't get paid hourly. Wagoner gets his paycheck no matter how many hours he works, and no matter how much he accomplishes.
JakeRobb is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 11:10 AM
  #143  
Registered User
 
LeadSled1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Earleville, MD
Posts: 182
Originally Posted by JakeRobb


No, they're asking for a loan. Assuming that the loan actually gets them out of this mess, there is no sacrifice in it for taxpayers.


Thats a big assumption. If they are not willing to change how things work and just stay status quo, how can they get out of this mess?
LeadSled1 is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 11:10 AM
  #144  
Registered User
 
mdenz3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,173

Sherman asked the CEOs, "I'm going to ask you to raise your hand if you are planning to sell your jet in place now and fly back commercial." "Let the record show, no hands went up," noted Sherman
Can you say PR stunt? Does anyone really believe that would make any sense?

Ok I change my mind. The three need to go down, not to teach a few CEo's but to teach the average retard American. We deserve to be a third world country.

Last edited by mdenz3; 11-20-2008 at 11:21 AM.
mdenz3 is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 11:15 AM
  #145  
Banned
 
shock6906's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sandy VJJville
Posts: 3,584
Originally Posted by mdenz3


Can you PR stunt? Does anyone really believe that would make any sense?
Agreed. That question was totally put on for show. Our news and government seems to have become something of a three ring circus here lately.
shock6906 is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 11:23 AM
  #146  
Registered User
 
formula79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 3,698
AIG has 7 jets..they are in the process of pairing down to 5. I wonder how the AIG reps got to Washington for their testimony? It is embarrasing how we flog the auto industry, yet the banking industry can fail on a much higher level and they get a slap on the wrist.

One thing you have to understand is good coroprate execs are like star sports players. You HAVE to pay them to come work for you, and if your are a company in the crapper like GM, you have to pay even more. No executive with half his sense would tie his name to some mess like GM unless he was set up nice for life. Think about it. If you worked for Best Buy and were a great manager..making good money...whould you take a similar job at Circuit City making less money? I know execs make in the millions...but if GM wants good ones, or to keep the ones they have motivated, they have to pay market value.


Mullay is paid well because Ford had to convince him to come from Boeing. Nardelli has some name rep (though I think he is over rated), and Chrysler paid for it. Wagoneer came through the GM system, and is really not that spectacullarly compensated vs. the other two when you look at it.
formula79 is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 11:25 AM
  #147  
Registered User
 
mdenz3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,173
Originally Posted by shock6906
Agreed. That question was totally put on for show. Our news and government seems to have become something of a three ring circus here lately.
If the media wanted to do some real reporting they would ask that bozo why he used a serious meeting with these executives as a circus of stupid questions rather than take the oppertunity to see what they had in mind for change, what would happen if they did fail, how would the money be used, what controls would be implace to prevent another AIG type bungling of the funds, etc. Their choice of transportation hails in comparisson to the poor choice this scumbag has made.
mdenz3 is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 11:29 AM
  #148  
Registered User
 
onebadponcho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Shelton, WA
Posts: 954
Originally Posted by shock6906
Yeah, because when you're looking to borrow 25 billion dollars from the US government in an attempt to save your industry and company, you're just going to phone it in.

Headline: "Auto industry big-wigs want $25B loan, but it's not important enough to ask for in person...they phoned in instead!"
Or they could say, "I/we apologize for not coming in person, due to us doing EVERYTHING we possibly can to save money and keep our companies afloat." That and I'm sure MUCH MORE important conversations than even this have occurred over a telephone. Besides, it's not just this "flying around in private jets when we're about bankrupt" stupidity I'm concerned about. My thinking is this: If they're wasting money on that, what other "necessities" are they wasting money on?
onebadponcho is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 11:46 AM
  #149  
Registered User
 
94LightningGal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Payson, AZ USA
Posts: 1,181
Frankly, they would have been bashed if they had paid for first class airfair for themselves, and all of the aids that they would take with them, also.

About the only way they would not have been bashed for paying for travel, is if they had walked............... with no shoes................. uphill................. both ways................. in a blazing snowstorm.

Then, the politicians would have bashed them for being so stupid to walk in a snowstorm............ so you are obviously too stupid to run an auto manufacturer.

In other words, they were not going to win, no matter what they did.
94LightningGal is offline  
Old 11-20-2008, 11:51 AM
  #150  
Registered User
 
onebadponcho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Shelton, WA
Posts: 954
Originally Posted by robvas
You know what I mean. How much is an hour of his time worth.
This is from another board:

Originally Posted by GMmexican
So by my calculations, HIS time is worth about (MINUS) $441780.82/hour.
onebadponcho is offline  


Quick Reply: GM top Exec. don't want to give up anything?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 AM.